Website review, no card needed
sjcs.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202634 issues · 77 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on sjcs.org, 16 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78C- #46,480 of 92,128 reviewed websitesbeats 44%
- #28,650 of 48,867 online storesbeats 36%
- #202 of 1,030 Squarespace websitesbeats 75%
Closest competitors among online stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 133 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 149 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 131 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
5.0 s · 2.0 MB7 images could be 2.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.0 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.3 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.3 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.0 s · 603 KiB24 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (603 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
2.5 s15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.1 s
A phone's processor spends 4.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Squarespace and Facebook and others), adding 2.7 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
760 ms · 174 KiBAbout 174 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 760 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 808 ms
808 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 808 ms of main-thread work and 998 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Squarespace adds 566 ms
566 msSquarespace costs a phone 566 ms of main-thread work and 967 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
500 ms · 147 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 147 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 500 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 297 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
everyaction.com adds 208 ms
208 mseveryaction.com costs a phone 208 ms of main-thread work and 303 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 34 ms
34 msYour server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.9 s
24.9 sYour largest element takes 24.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 29.0 s
29.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 29.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.8 s
9.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s
1.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s
3.9 sThe first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 133 ms to 131 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.09
0.09For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 25% faster for real visitors
-25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.1 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.017
0.017The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.017, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.8 MB in 140 requests
5.8 MBYour homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 140 requests on a phone: scripts 2.8 MB (59), images 2.6 MB (21) and stylesheets 229 KiB (19). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (843 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.65 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.65 g of CO₂e: 198.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
14 text elements with low contrast
14 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 15 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (29 characters)
Your title is only 29 characters: “St. John's Community Services”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: image is not an absolute URL ("//images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/60f1f3dd4aa04c30258…”.
36 internal links, 11 external
The homepage links to 36 pages on sjcs.org and 11 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 141 characters
Your meta description is 141 characters: “We're advancing inclusive communities where every person, regardless of circumstances, has the right and opportunity to…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “We Won't Stop Until Every Dream is Realized”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.sjcs.org/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sjcs.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.sjcs.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (414 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
7 pages without a meta description
https://www.sjcs.org/services, https://www.sjcs.org/dreams, https://www.sjcs.org/about, https://www.sjcs.org/careers, https://www.sjcs.org/events and https://www.sjcs.org/history and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 pages without an H1
https://www.sjcs.org/dreams, https://www.sjcs.org/careers, https://www.sjcs.org/delaware and https://www.sjcs.org/washingtondc have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
6 pages with very little text
https://www.sjcs.org/services, https://www.sjcs.org/dreams, https://www.sjcs.org/careers, https://www.sjcs.org/delaware, https://www.sjcs.org/virginia and https://www.sjcs.org/washingtondc have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
13 internal pages checked
We fetched 13 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 13 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://secure.everyaction.com/v1/Forms/wSK3rVAo3UKiluK9emjgMg2' from origin 'https://www.…”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
9 of 9 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 389 words of copy
The homepage carries about 389 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Hotjar.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
35 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 35 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sjcs.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Squarespace
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
- Hosting
- Squarespace
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on sjcs.org, including 21 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.