Website review, no card needed
skymsen.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202647 issues · 91 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on skymsen.com, 21 of them high impact, across 91 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 126 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 125 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 124 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 122 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 123 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 118 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 132 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.2 s
2.4 s
3.6 s
4.9 s
6.1 s
7.3 s
8.5 s
9.7 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
22.9 s · 5.3 MB55 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.3 MB).
Improve image delivery
15.9 s · 3.8 MB23 images could be 3.8 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 15.9 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.0 s · 687 KiBAbout 687 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.0 s faster on a phone.
Font display
3.0 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 3.0 s).
Mobile performance score: 35
35/100Your mobile performance score is 35 (desktop: 31). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 1.5 MB and 788 ms of main-thread time.
Render-blocking requests
900 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.
Google Tag Manager adds 237 ms
237 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 237 ms of main-thread work and 363 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 182 ms
182 msFacebook costs a phone 182 ms of main-thread work and 306 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 97 ms
97 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 97 ms of main-thread work and 382 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
160 ms · 33 KiBAbout 33 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 160 ms faster on a phone.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 155 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
23 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 23 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify CSS
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.6 s
A phone's processor spends 1.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 747 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 38.3 s
38.3 sYour largest element takes 38.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Presença”.
Speed Index: 18.6 s
18.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 18.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 38.3 s
38.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 38.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.737
0.737The layout shifts by 0.737 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
31 images without width and height
31 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 266 ms
266 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 266 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 126 ms to 132 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.6 s to 1.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 122 ms
122 msReal visitors wait 122 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.04
0.04For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.04 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 601 ms
601 msReal visitors wait 601 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.5 MB in 93 requests
6.5 MBYour homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 93 requests on a phone: images 4.6 MB (37), scripts 1.5 MB (31) and fonts 344 KiB (7). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
15 images in older formats
15 images (4.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
4 images below the first screen load straight away
4 images further down the page (587 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image far larger than shown
258 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example banner_catalogo3.png at 1,900 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 258 KiB.
About 1.8 g of CO₂ per visit
1.85 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.85 g of CO₂e: 221.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
2 buttons without a name
2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
Unlabelled dropdowns
1 dropdown has no label.
11 tap targets too small
11 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
8 text elements with low contrast
8 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
3 images without alt text
3 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (13 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 13 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
9 links without text
9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (6 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 10 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (7 characters)
Your title is only 7 characters: “Skymsen”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
66 internal links, 14 external
The homepage links to 66 pages on skymsen.com and 14 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “SE É SKYMSEN, PODE CONFIAR.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.skymsen.com/index.php/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.skymsen.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.skymsen.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (536 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 pages share a title
/, https://www.skymsen.com/en and https://www.skymsen.com/es all use the title “Skymsen”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages without a meta description
https://www.skymsen.com/index.php/boleto, https://www.skymsen.com/en, https://www.skymsen.com/es and https://www.skymsen.com/index.php/componentes/distribuidores have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 2 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.skymsen.com/en, whose canonical is https://www.skymsen.com/en/index.php. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.skymsen.com/index.php/componentes and https://www.skymsen.com/index.php/componentes/distribuidores have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.skymsen.com/index.php/assistencia took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 21 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://use.fontawesome.com/releases/v5.0.10/css/all.css' from origin 'https://www.skymsen…”.
4 low-resolution images
4 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
49 of 56 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 385 words of copy
The homepage carries about 385 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
19 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 19 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at skymsen.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on skymsen.com, including 16 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.