Website review, no card needed

smallcase.com logo

smallcase.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202630 issues · 80 checks

This review found 30 issues worth fixing on smallcase.com, 8 of them high impact, across 80 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.2 s2.0 sMay 9Oct 242.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.1 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20262.9 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.6 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.6 s
Jul 25, 20262.6 s
Aug 1, 20262.6 s
Aug 8, 20262.6 s
Aug 15, 20262.5 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.4 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.3 s
Sep 26, 20262.2 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.4 s
Oct 24, 20262.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
217 ms182 msMay 9Oct 24211 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026202 ms
May 16, 2026200 ms
May 23, 2026198 ms
May 30, 2026194 ms
Jun 6, 2026193 ms
Jun 13, 2026191 ms
Jun 20, 2026188 ms
Jun 27, 2026188 ms
Jul 4, 2026188 ms
Jul 11, 2026186 ms
Jul 18, 2026187 ms
Jul 25, 2026187 ms
Aug 1, 2026187 ms
Aug 8, 2026187 ms
Aug 15, 2026191 ms
Aug 22, 2026195 ms
Aug 29, 2026196 ms
Sep 5, 2026205 ms
Sep 12, 2026212 ms
Sep 19, 2026212 ms
Sep 26, 2026213 ms
Oct 3, 2026211 ms
Oct 10, 2026205 ms
Oct 17, 2026208 ms
Oct 24, 2026211 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of smallcase.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. smallcase.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. smallcase.com at 2.5 s2.5 s
  3. smallcase.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  4. smallcase.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  5. smallcase.com at 6.3 s6.3 s
  6. smallcase.com at 7.5 s7.5 s
  7. smallcase.com at 8.8 s8.8 s
  8. smallcase.com at 10.0 s10.0 s

Speed

8 to fix62
  • Main-thread work: 4.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 MB

    About 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Mobile performance score: 62

    62/100

    Your mobile performance score is 62. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Render-blocking requests

    950 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 950 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    443 KiB

    28 images could be 443 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    388 KiB

    30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (388 KiB).

  • Google Tag Manager adds 308 ms

    308 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 308 ms of main-thread work and 514 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 350 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 799 KiB and 470 ms of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 91 KiB

    About 91 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    85 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 85 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 428 ms

    428 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 428 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.8 s

    23.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.2 s

    1.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 434 ms

    434 ms

    Real visitors wait 434 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Your largest element takes 3.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Phone Mockup”.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 202 ms to 211 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 664 ms

    664 ms

    Real visitors wait 664 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors

    -20%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 2.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002

    0.002

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

2 to fix60
  • Page weight: 4.4 MB in 249 requests

    4.4 MB

    Your homepage downloads 4.4 MB in 249 requests on a phone: scripts 2.5 MB (94), other files 992 KiB (62) and images 698 KiB (55). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    32 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example generic_smallcase.45949657.png at 384 px wide, shown at 100 px. Resized copies would save about 32 KiB.

  • 1 image in older formats

    1 image (81 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (84 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.25 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.25 g of CO₂e: 149.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9696
  • 10 text elements with low contrast

    10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 8 links without text

    8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 40 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 1 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

1 to fixGoogle 9298
  • 5 links crawlers can't follow

    5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 29 internal links, 17 external

    The homepage links to 29 pages on smallcase.com and 17 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 110 characters

    Your meta description is 110 characters: “Invest in model portfolios of Indian & US stocks & ETFs, and mutual funds. Managed by SEBI-registered experts.”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Put your money to work”.

  • Title: 62 characters

    Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “smallcase | Model Portfolios | Indian & US Stocks & ETFs | MFs”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.smallcase.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.smallcase.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (695 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.smallcase.com/llms.txt (5 KiB, 19 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

4 to fix70
  • 3 pages without a title

    https://www.smallcase.com/explore/smallcases, https://www.smallcase.com/explore/mutual-funds and https://www.smallcase.com/explore/stocks have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.smallcase.com/explore/smallcases, https://www.smallcase.com/explore/mutual-funds and https://www.smallcase.com/explore/stocks have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.smallcase.com/collection/etf-picks-694a653d227b8fd5bfe8cecc, whose canonical is https://www.smallcase.com/collection/etf-portfolios-694a653d227b8fd5bfe8cecc. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://www.smallcase.com/explore/smallcases, https://www.smallcase.com/explore/mutual-funds, https://www.smallcase.com/explore/stocks and https://www.smallcase.com/blog have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages with very little text

    https://www.smallcase.com/explore/smallcases, https://www.smallcase.com/explore/mutual-funds and https://www.smallcase.com/explore/stocks have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 7391
  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 401 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    39 of 44 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 710 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 710 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Download the app” and “Download App”.

  • 8 calls to action

    The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Get started”, “Download App” and “Subscribe”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: a star rating and 3 trust badges.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at smallcase.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
CloudFront

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 30 issues on smallcase.com, including 15 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25