Website review, no card needed

snapp.supply logo

snapp.supply website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 25 October 202623 issues · 66 checks

This review found 23 issues worth fixing on snapp.supply, 5 of them high impact, across 66 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.9 s1.5 sMay 2Oct 171.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20262.6 s
May 9, 20262.2 s
May 16, 20262.3 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.2 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20261.7 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.7 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.7 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.8 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.8 s
Sep 19, 20261.8 s
Sep 26, 20261.8 s
Oct 3, 20261.8 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
141 ms89 msMay 2Oct 17135 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202695 ms
May 9, 202695 ms
May 16, 202697 ms
May 23, 202698 ms
May 30, 2026102 ms
Jun 6, 2026103 ms
Jun 13, 2026106 ms
Jun 20, 2026106 ms
Jun 27, 2026106 ms
Jul 4, 2026108 ms
Jul 11, 2026112 ms
Jul 18, 2026116 ms
Jul 25, 2026121 ms
Aug 1, 2026118 ms
Aug 8, 2026117 ms
Aug 15, 2026120 ms
Aug 22, 2026117 ms
Aug 29, 2026123 ms
Sep 5, 2026123 ms
Sep 12, 2026121 ms
Sep 19, 2026123 ms
Sep 26, 2026126 ms
Oct 3, 2026128 ms
Oct 10, 2026130 ms
Oct 17, 2026135 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of snapp.supply (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. snapp.supply at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. snapp.supply at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. snapp.supply at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. snapp.supply at 2.2 s2.2 s
  5. snapp.supply at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. snapp.supply at 3.3 s3.3 s
  7. snapp.supply at 3.9 s3.9 s
  8. snapp.supply at 4.4 s4.4 s

Speed

3 to fix96
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.6 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    550 ms · 638 KiB

    36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (638 KiB).

  • Font display

    950 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 950 ms).

  • Improve image delivery

    158 KiB

    4 images could be 158 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    87 KiB

    About 87 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 1 third-party service on the page

    1 third-party service load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager), adding 123 KiB and 71 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 73 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    12 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 96

    96/100

    Your mobile performance score is 96 (desktop: 92). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 322 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 264 ms

    264 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 264 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

3 to fix100
  • Tap response (INP) got 39% slower for real visitors

    +39%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 135 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 4.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

11 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 136 ms

    136 ms

    Real visitors wait 136 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 789 ms

    789 ms

    Real visitors wait 789 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 26% faster for real visitors

    -26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.6 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the image “landing”.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.02

    0.02

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.02, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.9 s

    0.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.9 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 33 ms

    33 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 33 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • 4 images in older formats

    4 images (341 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.21 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.21 g of CO₂e: 25.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 771 KiB in 41 requests

    771 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 771 KiB in 41 requests on a phone: images 336 KiB (19), scripts 304 KiB (14) and fonts 113 KiB (4). That is a lean page.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9493
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (21 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 21 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 30 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 34 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 30 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 10074
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://snapp.supply/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at snapp.supply/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

  • 6 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 6 pages on snapp.supply and 5 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Meta description: 75 characters

    Your meta description is 75 characters: “اسنپ ساپلای راه حلی مدرن برای تامین مواد اولیه مصرفی رستوران ها، بدون دردسر”.

  • Title: 41 characters

    Your title is a healthy 41 characters: “اسنپ ساپلای | بهترین روش تامین مواد اولیه”.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://snapp.supply/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9693
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'needsInterpolation')”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    8 of 8 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix56
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a map but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Only about 4 words

    The homepage has only about 4 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at snapp.supply, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 23 issues on snapp.supply, including 6 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25