Website review, no card needed
sogenave.pt website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 26 October 202646 issues · 88 checks
This review found 46 issues worth fixing on sogenave.pt, 24 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
63DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 132 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 135 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 149 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.8 s
3.6 s
5.3 s
7.1 s
8.9 s
10.7 s
12.4 s
14.2 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
6.0 s · 9.6 MB63 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (9.6 MB).
Render-blocking requests
6.6 s11 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.6 s.
Reduce unused CSS
4.6 s · 985 KiBAbout 985 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.6 s faster on a phone.
Font display
2.2 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.2 s).
Mobile performance score: 29
29/100Your mobile performance score is 29 (desktop: 51). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 1.6 MBAbout 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Wistia and Facebook and others), adding 1.7 MB and 827 ms of main-thread time.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 217 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 217 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
300 ms · 135 KiB4 images could be 135 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 286 ms
286 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 286 ms of main-thread work and 499 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.7 s
A phone's processor spends 2.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Wistia adds 227 ms
227 msWistia costs a phone 227 ms of main-thread work and 346 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 67 ms
67 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 67 ms of main-thread work and 348 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 120 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify JavaScript
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify CSS
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
1 checks passed
Server response: 101 ms
101 msYour server sent the HTML in 101 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.9 s
4.9 sReal visitors wait 4.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.90
0.90For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.90 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 3.4 s
3.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Speed Index: 27.5 s
27.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 27.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 31.9 s
31.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.0 s
7.0 sThe first text or image appears after 7.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 8.7 s
8.7 sYour largest element takes 8.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Fazemos a cobertura de todo o território nacional e trabalh…”. Most of its time is element render delay (10.0 s).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.886
0.886The layout shifts by 0.886 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 11% slower for real visitors
+11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 131 ms to 149 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 146 ms
146 msReal visitors wait 146 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.4 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 152 ms
152 msScripts block the page for only 152 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.0 MB in 100 requests
11.0 MBYour homepage downloads 11.0 MB in 100 requests on a phone: media 5.3 MB (2), scripts 3.4 MB (43) and stylesheets 1.1 MB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
60 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example mapa-distribuicao-sogenave.gif at 2,080 px wide, shown at 312 px. Resized copies would save about 60 KiB.
3 images in older formats
3 images (205 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images below the first screen load straight away
3 images further down the page (205 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit
3.13 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.13 g of CO₂e: 375.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
4 text elements with low contrast
4 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 tap targets too small
4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Form elements should have a visible label (1 element)
Form elements should have a visible label: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (8 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 8 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
44 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“World of Food Solutions” and “Denúncia anónima”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
62 internal links, 19 external
The homepage links to 62 pages on sogenave.pt and 19 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 34 characters
Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “Sogenave - World of Food Solutions”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www3.sogenave.pt/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www3.sogenave.pt/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www3.sogenave.pt/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (754 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www3.sogenave.pt/certificados_apcer_sogenave-2 has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
2 pages share a title
https://www3.sogenave.pt/contactos and https://www3.sogenave.pt/stage/contactos all use the title “Contactos - Sogenave”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
6 pages without a meta description
https://www3.sogenave.pt/sobre, https://www3.sogenave.pt/solucoes, https://www3.sogenave.pt/solucoes/serdialvending, https://www3.sogenave.pt/contactos, https://www3.sogenave.pt/stage/contactos and https://www3.sogenave.pt/certificados_apcer_sogenave-2 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www3.sogenave.pt/stage/contactos, whose canonical is https://www3.sogenave.pt/contactos. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://www3.sogenave.pt/certificados_apcer_sogenave-2 has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 pages slow to respond
https://www3.sogenave.pt/sobre, https://www3.sogenave.pt/solucoes, https://www3.sogenave.pt/solucoes/cabazes-natal, https://www3.sogenave.pt/solucoes/food-equipment-2, https://www3.sogenave.pt/solucoes/serdialvending and https://www3.sogenave.pt/solucoes/suporte-a-eventos and 9 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
3 small tap targets
3 of 14 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
A 9-field form
Your longest form asks for 9 fields (7 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 360 words of copy
The homepage carries about 360 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and LinkedIn Insight.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
18 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sogenave.pt, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 46 issues on sogenave.pt, including 24 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.