Website review, no card needed

somethingnicecompany.com logo

somethingnicecompany.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202651 issues · 95 checks

This review found 51 issues worth fixing on somethingnicecompany.com, 21 of them high impact, across 95 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 71.7 MB in 480 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.5 s1.8 sMay 16Oct 312.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.9 s
May 30, 20262.0 s
Jun 6, 20262.0 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20262.1 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.1 s
Jul 25, 20262.1 s
Aug 1, 20262.1 s
Aug 8, 20262.1 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.3 s
Sep 5, 20262.4 s
Sep 12, 20262.4 s
Sep 19, 20262.4 s
Sep 26, 20262.3 s
Oct 3, 20262.3 s
Oct 10, 20262.3 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Oct 24, 20262.2 s
Oct 31, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
182 ms138 msMay 16Oct 31143 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026170 ms
May 23, 2026177 ms
May 30, 2026171 ms
Jun 6, 2026170 ms
Jun 13, 2026169 ms
Jun 20, 2026162 ms
Jun 27, 2026162 ms
Jul 4, 2026163 ms
Jul 11, 2026161 ms
Jul 18, 2026163 ms
Jul 25, 2026169 ms
Aug 1, 2026167 ms
Aug 8, 2026171 ms
Aug 15, 2026171 ms
Aug 22, 2026171 ms
Aug 29, 2026171 ms
Sep 5, 2026170 ms
Sep 12, 2026169 ms
Sep 19, 2026169 ms
Sep 26, 2026163 ms
Oct 3, 2026162 ms
Oct 10, 2026154 ms
Oct 17, 2026147 ms
Oct 24, 2026146 ms
Oct 31, 2026143 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of somethingnicecompany.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. somethingnicecompany.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  2. somethingnicecompany.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  3. somethingnicecompany.com at 7.8 s7.8 s
  4. somethingnicecompany.com at 10.4 s10.4 s
  5. somethingnicecompany.com at 13.1 s13.1 s
  6. somethingnicecompany.com at 15.7 s15.7 s
  7. somethingnicecompany.com at 18.3 s18.3 s
  8. somethingnicecompany.com at 20.9 s20.9 s

Speed

14 to fix33
  • Main-thread work: 27.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 27.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 9.6 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • replocdn.com adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    replocdn.com costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 2.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 33

    33/100

    Your mobile performance score is 33. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 4,162 HTML elements

    The page has 4,162 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (replocdn.com, Shopify and alia-prod.com and others), adding 69.9 MB and 3.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Shopify adds 695 ms

    695 ms

    Shopify costs a phone 695 ms of main-thread work and 64.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 MB

    About 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Improve image delivery

    150 ms · 1,022 KiB

    17 images could be 1,022 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    700 ms

    3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.

  • alia-prod.com adds 538 ms

    538 ms

    alia-prod.com costs a phone 538 ms of main-thread work and 1,006 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • rebuyengine.com adds 504 ms

    504 ms

    rebuyengine.com costs a phone 504 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 433 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    378 KiB

    23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (378 KiB).

  • Klaviyo adds 305 ms

    305 ms

    Klaviyo costs a phone 305 ms of main-thread work and 501 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 96 KiB

    About 96 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    130 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 130 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify CSS

    36 KiB

    36 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 33 ms

    33 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 33 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Speed Index: 38.1 s

    38.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 38.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 173.2 s

    173.2 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 173.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 3.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.4 s

    7.4 s

    Your largest element takes 7.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 812 ms

    812 ms

    Real visitors wait 812 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.5 s

    2.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.9 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 163 ms

    163 ms

    Real visitors wait 163 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 17% faster for real visitors

    -17%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 170 ms to 143 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix53
  • Page weight: 71.7 MB in 480 requests

    71.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 71.7 MB in 480 requests on a phone: media 63.0 MB (16), scripts 4.2 MB (172) and other files 1.8 MB (208). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 10 images below the first screen load straight away

    10 images further down the page (492 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 3 images far larger than shown

    53 KiB

    3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 1d0e7d73-98c3-4590-a539-a44262388c66 at 1,080 px wide, shown at 300 px. Resized copies would save about 53 KiB.

  • About 20.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    20.33 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 20.33 g of CO₂e: 2439.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

14 to fixGoogle 7183
  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (30 elements)

    Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 30 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 21 text elements with low contrast

    21 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 6 tap targets too small

    6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (5 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name (5 elements)

    ARIA toggle fields must have an accessible name: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • ARIA commands must have an accessible name (3 elements)

    ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (3 elements)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 14 images without alt text

    14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (3 elements)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (30 elements)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 30 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • ARIA role should be appropriate for the element (5 elements)

    ARIA role should be appropriate for the element: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

1 checks passed
  • 52 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 66 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 52 passed and 14 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9288
  • Title is short (14 characters)

    Your title is only 14 characters: “Something Nice”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (259 characters)

    Your meta description is 259 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 51 internal links, 3 external

    The homepage links to 51 pages on somethingnicecompany.com and 3 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Something Nice”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://somethingnicecompany.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://somethingnicecompany.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Some text only appears after JavaScript runs

    35%

    The HTML your server sends has 510 of the 1,477 words a browser shows. AI crawlers don't run JavaScript, so they miss the rest.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://somethingnicecompany.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://somethingnicecompany.com/collections/new-arrivals, https://somethingnicecompany.com/collections/best-sellers and https://somethingnicecompany.com/collections/refills-replacements have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 12 pages without an H1

    https://somethingnicecompany.com/pages/build-your-bundle, https://somethingnicecompany.com/collections/new-arrivals, https://somethingnicecompany.com/collections/best-sellers, https://somethingnicecompany.com/collections/kits, https://somethingnicecompany.com/products/zero-pro-toothpaste and https://somethingnicecompany.com/products/halo-gum and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 8 pages with very little text

    https://somethingnicecompany.com/pages/build-your-bundle, https://somethingnicecompany.com/products/zero-pro-toothpaste, https://somethingnicecompany.com/products/halo-gum, https://somethingnicecompany.com/products/aquaclean-duo, https://somethingnicecompany.com/products/zero-toothpaste and https://somethingnicecompany.com/products/lumismart-whitening-strips and 2 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 16 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9671
  • 3 broken images

    3 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://files.alia-prod.com/Zerozero.webp-1755121028282.

  • 25 small tap targets

    25 of 79 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • About 1,477 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,477 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 15 calls to action

    The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “SHOP”, “Shop by Product” and “SHOP NOW$84.00$120.00”.

  • 6 short forms

    6 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: a star rating and “500+ reviews”.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 8 trackers load before any consent

    8

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 29 cookies set on arrival

    29

    Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 54 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 54 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at somethingnicecompany.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 20 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Intelligems A B Testing · Blotout Edgetag · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Triplewhale · Simprosys Google Shopping Feed · Judge Me Reviews · Pagefly Ai Page Builder · Rebuy Personalization Engine · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Loop Returns · Rivo Loyalty Rewards Referrals · Applovin Shop Integration · jsdelivr.net · goaffpro.com · mailchimp.com · chimpstatic.com · cloudfront.net · richpanel.com · rebuyengine.com · postscript.io

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 51 issues on somethingnicecompany.com, including 22 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25