Website review, no card needed
sorteostec.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202647 issues · 90 checks
This review found 47 issues worth fixing on sorteostec.org, 18 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 189 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 217 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 214 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 202 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 240 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 229 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 256 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 253 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
Mobile performance score: 38
38/100Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 6.3 s
A phone's processor spends 6.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (AppDynamics, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.8 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 892 KiBAbout 892 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
AppDynamics adds 942 ms
942 msAppDynamics costs a phone 942 ms of main-thread work and 179 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 754 ms
754 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 754 ms of main-thread work and 840 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 494 KiB32 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (494 KiB).
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 349 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,896 HTML elements
The page has 1,896 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 69 KiB4 images could be 69 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 41 KiBAbout 41 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 264 ms
264 msYour server sent the HTML in 264 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 23.9 s
23.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.7 s
4.7 sThe first text or image appears after 4.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s
1.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.5 s
5.5 sYour largest element takes 5.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “El Sorteo para Ganar la mejor casa de tus sueños el hogar p…”.
Speed Index: 6.9 s
6.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 263 ms
263 msReal visitors wait 263 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.16
0.16For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.16 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 25% slower for real visitors
+25%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 189 ms to 253 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 69% slower for real visitors
+69%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.2 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 708 ms
708 msReal visitors wait 708 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.032
0.032The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.032, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.3 MB in 152 requests
3.3 MBYour homepage downloads 3.3 MB in 152 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (43), HTML 469 KiB (5) and images 268 KiB (51). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
57 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example sms36-3x2-nov-slider.webp at 2,000 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 57 KiB.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.93 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.93 g of CO₂e: 112.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
17 text elements with low contrast
17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Hidden but focusable
1 element hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (255 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 255 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 60 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (215 characters)
Your meta description is 215 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
11 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 11 pages on sorteostec.org and 1 external page.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “¡Elige tu Sorteo Favorito!”.
Title: 35 characters
Your title is a healthy 35 characters: “Sorteos Tec. ¡Ganas más cuando das!”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.sorteostec.org/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sorteostec.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
19%A phone browser shows 2,052 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 384. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://sorteostec.org/llms.txt (22 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages point its canonical at the homepage
https://sorteostec.org/consulta-ganadores, https://sorteostec.org/tc-aviso-privacidad and https://sorteostec.org/avisos-de-privacidad declare the homepage as their canonical URL, which tells Google they are copies of the homepage and keeps them out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
11 pages share 2 titles
/, https://sorteostec.org/tc-aviso-privacidad and https://sorteostec.org/avisos-de-privacidad all use the title “Sorteos Tec. ¡Ganas más cuando das!”, and 1 other title repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
8 pages without a meta description
https://sorteostec.org/carrito/mi-cuenta/mi-perfil, https://sorteostec.org/carrito/mi-cuenta/ewallet, https://sorteostec.org/carrito/mi-cuenta/compras/boletos, https://sorteostec.org/carrito/mi-cuenta/rotulaciones, https://sorteostec.org/carrito/mi-cuenta/facturas and https://sorteostec.org/carrito/mi-cuenta/premios and 2 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://sorteostec.org/tc-aviso-privacidad and https://sorteostec.org/avisos-de-privacidad use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
9 pages without an H1
https://sorteostec.org/carrito/mi-cuenta/mi-perfil, https://sorteostec.org/carrito/mi-cuenta/ewallet, https://sorteostec.org/carrito/mi-cuenta/compras/boletos, https://sorteostec.org/carrito/mi-cuenta/rotulaciones, https://sorteostec.org/carrito/mi-cuenta/facturas and https://sorteostec.org/carrito/mi-cuenta/premios and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://sorteostec.org/consulta-ganadores has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
2 pages slow to respond
https://sorteostec.org/tc-aviso-privacidad and https://sorteostec.org/avisos-de-privacidad took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
11 internal pages checked
We fetched 11 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 11 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 11 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=187013457&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=f95d2af6-97a2-41c7-8fa3-dd04a6db94c9&bo=1&sid=fa422800d67c11f1812b63d2da8e616a&vid=fa422720d67c11f19506d786606b71fe&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.
53 small tap targets
53 of 163 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_SOCKET_NOT_CONNECTED”.
Requests the geolocation permission on page load
Requests the geolocation permission on page load.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 2,052 words of copy
The homepage carries about 2,052 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
13 trackers load before any consent
13Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Criteo, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and 8 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (HubSpot cookie banner) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
29 cookies set on arrival
29Opening the homepage sets 29 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
51 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 51 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: HubSpot cookie banner
A consent management tool (HubSpot cookie banner) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sorteostec.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Drupal
- Framework
- Angular
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Imperva
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 47 issues on sorteostec.org, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.