Website review, no card needed
sourceability.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202628 issues · 76 checks
This review found 28 issues worth fixing on sourceability.com, 6 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 12.5 MB in 72 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
85BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 120 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 113 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 148 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 143 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 215 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 210 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 171 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
150 ms · 10.8 MB21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10.8 MB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (website-files.com, Google Tag Manager and consentpro.com and others), adding 12.4 MB and 790 ms of main-thread time.
website-files.com adds 560 ms
560 mswebsite-files.com costs a phone 560 ms of main-thread work and 12.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 80
80/100Your mobile performance score is 80. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Render-blocking requests
900 ms5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 900 ms.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 154 KiBAbout 154 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
1,864 HTML elements
The page has 1,864 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
237 KiB7 images could be 237 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 156 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
101 KiBAbout 101 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.9 s
A phone's processor spends 1.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 858 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 5 ms
5 msYour server sent the HTML in 5 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Speed Index: 6.3 s
6.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.3 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sThe first text or image appears after 3.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 7.9 s
7.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 7.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.15
0.15For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 46% slower for real visitors
+46%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 131 ms to 171 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 33% slower for real visitors
+33%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.2 s
3.2 sYour largest element takes 3.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Sourcing that keeps you moving.”. Most of its time is element render delay (2.3 s).
19 images without width and height
19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 147 ms
147 msReal visitors wait 147 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user TTFB: 599 ms
599 msReal visitors wait 599 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 148 ms
148 msScripts block the page for only 148 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 12.5 MB in 72 requests
12.5 MBYour homepage downloads 12.5 MB in 72 requests on a phone: media 10.6 MB (4), images 862 KiB (21) and scripts 505 KiB (23). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
52 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 6ad007f2cbbde2d0986bfe4c_2026.08_Q3_LTR_homepage.png at 320 px wide, shown at 70 px. Resized copies would save about 52 KiB.
2 images in older formats
2 images (137 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.5 g of CO₂ per visit
3.55 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.55 g of CO₂e: 425.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (24 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 24 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 78 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 1 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: url is not an absolute URL ("/")”.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
73 internal links, 17 external
The homepage links to 73 pages on sourceability.com and 17 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 140 characters
Your meta description is 140 characters: “Sourceability provides real-time market data and end-to-end electronic component distribution to turn uncertainty into …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “The leading e-commerce marketplace for electronic components”.
Title: 62 characters
Your title is a healthy 62 characters: “Sourceability: Electronic component distribution made seamless”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://sourceability.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sourceability.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://sourceability.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,057 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a meta description
https://sourceability.com/events/sourceability-lead-time-report-webinar-q3-2026-trends-forecasts has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page with very little text
https://sourceability.com/send-rfq has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error: <svg> attribute width: Expected length, "currentWidth".”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
13 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 17 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 372 words of copy
The homepage carries about 372 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Get started today”, “Get in touch” and “Join our newsletter”.
5 short forms
5 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sourceability.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- Webflow
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Webflow
Hiring
- Hiring
- 62 open roles
- Teams
- Purchasing (17), Sales (14), Global Engineering Organization (13), QC/Logistics (5)
- Job board
- greenhouse
- Careers page
- sourceability.com/careers (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 28 issues on sourceability.com, including 17 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.