Website review, no card needed
sp-connect.es website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 6 November 202634 issues · 88 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on sp-connect.es, 10 of them high impact, across 88 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80B- #38,272 of 96,561 reviewed websitesbeats 55%
- #24,413 of 52,346 online storesbeats 47%
- #23,422 of 47,426 Shopify storesbeats 44%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 4.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 352 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 336 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 360 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 355 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 363 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 380 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 356 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 345 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 286 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 212 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 182 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.3 s5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.
10,340 HTML elements
The page has 10,340 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Reduce unused JavaScript
810 ms · 242 KiBAbout 242 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 810 ms faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Cookiebot, Google Tag Manager and cloudfront.net and others), adding 937 KiB and 654 ms of main-thread time.
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Cookiebot adds 265 ms
265 msCookiebot costs a phone 265 ms of main-thread work and 171 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
7 long tasks on the main thread
7 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 263 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Google Tag Manager adds 168 ms
168 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 168 ms of main-thread work and 334 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
200 ms · 210 KiB17 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (210 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 120 KiBAbout 120 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
167 KiB3 images could be 167 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Duplicated JavaScript
150 ms · 8 KiB8 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
66 KiB66 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
16 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 16 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
2 KiB2 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 81 ms
81 msYour server sent the HTML in 81 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 10.3 s
10.3 sYour largest element takes 10.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 14.4 s
14.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 14.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 6.5 s
6.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 398 ms
398 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 398 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s
2.3 sThe first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 2.4 s
2.4 sReal visitors wait 2.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 158 ms
158 msReal visitors wait 158 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 704 ms
704 msReal visitors wait 704 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 46% faster for real visitors
-46%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 352 ms to 182 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 45% faster for real visitors
-45%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.2 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.0 MB in 296 requests
3.0 MBYour homepage downloads 3.0 MB in 296 requests on a phone: scripts 1.2 MB (95), other files 1,023 KiB (161) and images 552 KiB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
11 images in older formats
11 images (779 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
3 images far larger than shown
37 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example moto-mount-pro-moto-mount-pro-53138-view01.webp at 390 px wide, shown at 116 px. Resized copies would save about 37 KiB.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.85 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.85 g of CO₂e: 102.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
23 tap targets too small
23 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children. (1 element).
All page content should be contained by landmarks (3 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 3 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
20 links without text
20 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (5 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 121 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
49 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 49 passed and 7 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (66 characters)
Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “SP Connect | Montaje rápido y seguro de smartphones – SP United EU”.
Meta description is long (212 characters)
Your meta description is 212 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Structured data has 3 problems
Structured data found (Organization and WebSite) but with 3 problems, for example “Organization: url points at a different host (https://sp-connect.eu)”.
224 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 224 pages on sp-connect.es and 9 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “SOPORTES PREMIUM PARA TELÉFONO”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://sp-connect.es/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://sp-connect.es/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,393 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://sp-connect.es/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages without a meta description
https://sp-connect.es/collections/iphone-18-series and https://sp-connect.es/collections/protectors have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://sp-connect.es/products/phone-case-apple and https://sp-connect.es/products/phone-case-samsung use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
3 pages without an H1
https://sp-connect.es/collections/phone-cases, https://sp-connect.es/products/phone-case-apple and https://sp-connect.es/products/phone-case-samsung have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://sp-connect.es/collections/accessories, https://sp-connect.es/collections/protectors and https://sp-connect.es/collections/spare-parts took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 92 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
76 of 83 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 733 words of copy
The homepage carries about 733 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “BUY NOW”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 24 customer or partner logos, a star rating and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Hotjar.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Klaviyo (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Cookiebot) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
8 cookies set on arrival
8Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Cookiebot
A consent management tool (Cookiebot) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sp-connect.es, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Variant Image Wizard Swatch · Seo Manager Venntov · Judge Me Reviews · Gorgias Live Chat Helpdesk · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Back In Stock · tabarn.app · pwztag.com · cloudfront.net · zakeke.com · 9gtb.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Hotjar
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on sp-connect.es, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.