Website review, no card needed
spectrosci.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 19 October 202644 issues · 87 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on spectrosci.com, 21 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
70CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 4.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 95 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 103 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 102 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 107 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 103 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.3 s
1.9 s
2.6 s
3.2 s
3.8 s
4.5 s
5.1 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
16.6 s · 2.9 MB200 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.9 MB).
Render-blocking requests
10.8 s71 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 10.8 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
7.3 s · 1.3 MBAbout 1.3 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 7.3 s faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
1.1 s · 424 KiB5 images could be 424 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 25
25/100Your mobile performance score is 25 (desktop: 42). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.4 s
A phone's processor spends 4.4 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Google Tag Manager and Optanon and others), adding 1.8 MB and 1.2 s of main-thread time.
Minify JavaScript
900 ms · 246 KiB246 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
900 ms · 195 KiB195 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
YouTube adds 565 ms
565 msYouTube costs a phone 565 ms of main-thread work and 980 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 538 ms
538 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 538 ms of main-thread work and 602 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
500 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 500 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
280 ms · 157 KiBAbout 157 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 280 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 243 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 16 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 16 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 16 ms
16 msYour server sent the HTML in 16 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.8 s
4.8 sReal visitors wait 4.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 9.2 s
9.2 sThe first text or image appears after 9.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 39.7 s
39.7 sYour largest element takes 39.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “This site uses cookies, pixels, and similar tools (“cookies…”.
Time to Interactive: 39.8 s
39.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 39.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.1 s
12.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s
1.1 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.167
0.167The layout shifts by 0.167 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 103 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 103 ms
103 msReal visitors wait 103 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.05
0.05For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.7 s to 4.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.8 MB in 231 requests
6.8 MBYour homepage downloads 6.8 MB in 231 requests on a phone: scripts 3.9 MB (123), images 1.3 MB (20) and stylesheets 1.0 MB (66). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images in older formats
5 images (689 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image far larger than shown
128 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example spectro-banner-1.jpg at 834 px wide, shown at 160 px. Resized copies would save about 128 KiB.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (234 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.93 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.93 g of CO₂e: 231.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
23 text elements with low contrast
23 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
4 form fields without a label
4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 14 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
47 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 51 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 47 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (215 characters)
Your meta description is 215 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://www.edax.com/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
147 internal links, 21 external
The homepage links to 147 pages on spectrosci.com and 21 external pages.
3 checks passed
Title: 42 characters
Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Spectro Scientific - Confidence in knowing”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.spectrosci.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.spectrosci.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (774 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 121 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
1 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 low-resolution image
1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 458 words of copy
The homepage carries about 458 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.
7 calls to action
The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Learn More” and “Register”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
7 cookies set on arrival
7Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
10 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 10 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at spectrosci.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Azure
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on spectrosci.com, including 22 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.