Website review, no card needed
speedcommerce.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202626 issues · 69 checks
This review found 26 issues worth fixing on speedcommerce.com, 10 of them high impact, across 69 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 4.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 128 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 131 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 136 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 132 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 131 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 157 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 127 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
450 ms · 118 KiB3 images could be 118 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 95
95/100Your mobile performance score is 95 (desktop: 99). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.1 s
A phone's processor spends 0.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 22 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 3 ms
3 msYour server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Real-user LCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors wait 3.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sYour largest element takes 2.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 128 ms to 127 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Real-user INP: 123 ms
123 msReal visitors wait 123 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% faster for real visitors
-13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.3 s to 4.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Time to Interactive: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe page is fully interactive after 2.9 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.03
0.03The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.03, good is under 0.1).
Speed Index: 1.2 s
1.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 1.2 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
1 image in older formats
1 image (164 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.1 g of CO₂ per visit
0.11 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.11 g of CO₂e: 13.5 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Page weight: 406 KiB in 13 requests
406 KiBYour homepage downloads 406 KiB in 13 requests on a phone: fonts 192 KiB (6), images 178 KiB (5) and HTML 32 KiB (1). That is a lean page.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
26 tap targets too small
26 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (7 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 7 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
7 links without text
7 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 6 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
33 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 8 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is long (73 characters)
Your title is 73 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “3PL Fulfillment Center: Ecommerce, Small Business & More | Speed Commerce”.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
61 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 61 pages on speedcommerce.com and 5 external pages.
4 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “3PL FulfillmentTurbocharged”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.speedcommerce.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://u47vbn0w51.onrocket.site/categories-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.speedcommerce.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
12 pages without a meta description
https://www.speedcommerce.com/solutions, https://www.speedcommerce.com/customer-care, https://www.speedcommerce.com/ecommerce-customer-service, https://www.speedcommerce.com/fulfillment-b2b, https://www.speedcommerce.com/long-term-storage and https://www.speedcommerce.com/freight-management and 6 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 51 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
30 small tap targets
30 of 50 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
Only about 108 words
The homepage has only about 108 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
2 checks passed
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact Center”, “eCommerce Order Fulfillment” and “GET A QUOTE”.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at speedcommerce.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 26 issues on speedcommerce.com, including 7 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.