Website review, no card needed

spherelabs.co logo

spherelabs.co website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202623 issues · 92 checks

This review found 23 issues worth fixing on spherelabs.co, 6 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
8.2 s3.2 sMay 23Nov 74.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 23, 20264.3 s
May 30, 20264.2 s
Jun 6, 20267.6 s
Jun 13, 20267.3 s
Jun 20, 20267.6 s
Jun 27, 20267.6 s
Jul 4, 20265.4 s
Jul 11, 20265.0 s
Jul 18, 20264.8 s
Jul 25, 20265.2 s
Aug 1, 20265.0 s
Aug 8, 20265.5 s
Aug 15, 20265.6 s
Aug 22, 20265.2 s
Aug 29, 20265.6 s
Sep 5, 20266.8 s
Sep 12, 20266.2 s
Sep 19, 20267.2 s
Sep 26, 20266.5 s
Oct 3, 20263.8 s
Oct 10, 20264.6 s
Oct 17, 20263.7 s
Oct 24, 20264.1 s
Oct 31, 20264.5 s
Nov 7, 20264.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
416 ms240 msMay 23Nov 7260 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 23, 2026280 ms
May 30, 2026301 ms
Jun 6, 2026344 ms
Jun 13, 2026341 ms
Jun 20, 2026357 ms
Jun 27, 2026377 ms
Jul 4, 2026354 ms
Jul 11, 2026301 ms
Jul 18, 2026287 ms
Jul 25, 2026292 ms
Aug 1, 2026278 ms
Aug 8, 2026279 ms
Aug 15, 2026321 ms
Aug 22, 2026277 ms
Aug 29, 2026355 ms
Sep 5, 2026361 ms
Sep 12, 2026344 ms
Sep 19, 2026396 ms
Sep 26, 2026313 ms
Oct 3, 2026312 ms
Oct 10, 2026353 ms
Oct 17, 2026281 ms
Oct 24, 2026280 ms
Oct 31, 2026291 ms
Nov 7, 2026260 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of spherelabs.co (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. spherelabs.co at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. spherelabs.co at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. spherelabs.co at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. spherelabs.co at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. spherelabs.co at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. spherelabs.co at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. spherelabs.co at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. spherelabs.co at 3.0 s3.0 s

spherelabs.co does not allow embedding, so this is Google's rendering of the page.

Speed

2 to fix86
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 86

    86/100

    Your mobile performance score is 86. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Osano CMP, posthog.com and website-files.com and others), adding 552 KiB and 489 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    150 ms · 127 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (127 KiB).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 24 KiB

    About 24 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    133 KiB

    About 133 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 132 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    20 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 20 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    18 KiB

    18 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 594 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 18 ms

    18 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 18 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Real visitors wait 4.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user INP: 260 ms

    260 ms

    Real visitors wait 260 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Your largest element takes 3.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Sphere was built to provide everyone a seat at the table of…”. Most of its time is element render delay (1.5 s).

  • Time to Interactive: 5.8 s

    5.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 5.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 18 images without width and height

    18 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Speed Index: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    -5%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 280 ms to 260 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.3 s to 4.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 135 ms

    135 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 135 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.2 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.16 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.16 g of CO₂e: 19.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 591 KiB in 38 requests

    591 KiB

    Your homepage downloads 591 KiB in 38 requests on a phone: scripts 422 KiB (22), fonts 72 KiB (1) and HTML 36 KiB (1). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9797
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 87 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 69 internal links, 34 external

    The homepage links to 69 pages on spherelabs.co and 34 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 138 characters

    Your meta description is 138 characters: “Learn about Sphere’s mission to make cross-border payments instant, transparent, and accessible through stablecoin-powe…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Sphere was built to provide everyone a seat at the table of modern money movement.We’re backed by the best to drive our…”.

  • Title: 63 characters

    Your title is a healthy 63 characters: “About Sphere: Building Global Stablecoin Payment Infrastructure”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://spherepay.co/about.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://spherepay.co/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and description; contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (964 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 22 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 4 small tap targets

    4 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “SplitText is not defined”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Security and trust

1 to fix93
  • No Content-Security-Policy

    No Content-Security-Policy header, the main browser-side defence against injected scripts.

  • Short HSTS lifetime

    HSTS is set, but max-age is 90 days; one year is the recommended minimum.

  • 1 link through redirect chains

    1 link go through two or more redirects, for example https://docs.spherepay.co/api-reference/.

  • No Permissions-Policy

    No Permissions-Policy header to switch off camera, microphone and location for embedded content.

  • No security.txt

    There is no /.well-known/security.txt telling researchers how to report a security problem to you.

6 checks passed
  • Served over HTTPS

    The homepage is served over HTTPS (spherepay.co).

  • Valid certificate (52 days left)

    The certificate from Google Trust Services · WR3 verifies for spherelabs.co and is valid for another 52 days.

  • Protected from clickjacking

    X-Frame-Options or a frame-ancestors policy stops other sites framing yours.

  • http:// redirects to https

    http://spherelabs.co redirects to the secure version.

  • HTTP/2 and HTTP/3

    The server speaks HTTP/2 and advertises HTTP/3, so browsers load many files over one connection.

  • All 43 links work

    All 43 links checked from your homepage (26 internal, 17 external) answered without errors; 1 did not answer within 5 s.

Domain and trust

1 checks passed
  • Certificate issuers are restricted

    CAA records allow only pki.goog and letsencrypt.org to issue certificates for spherepay.co, so a mis-issued certificate from anyone else is refused.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 272 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 272 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Sign up” and “Get started”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: PostHog.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Email authentication

1 to fix90
  • No DKIM key on the usual selectors

    We found no DKIM key on the selectors the big email providers use. If you send through one of them, turning on DKIM signing improves delivery.

  • Email authentication score: 90/100

    Email authentication: SPF record 25 points, plus 15 when it ends in -all (10 for ~all); DMARC record 25, plus 25 for a reject policy (15 for quarantine); a DKIM key on a common selector 10.

2 checks passed
  • DMARC policy: reject

    DMARC tells receivers to reject mail that fails authentication, and sends you reports.

  • SPF with a strict ending (-all)

    An SPF record lists your sending servers and tells receivers to reject anything else: “v=spf1 include:_spf.mx.cloudflare.net -all”.

Privacy and tracking

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: Osano

    A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Upkeep, stack and company

No signs of neglect in what was checked: the copyright year, CMS and plugin versions, and jQuery.

Stack

CMS
Webflow
Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
PostHog
Hosting
Cloudflare

Hiring

Hiring
2 open roles
Teams
Pay (2)
Job board
lever

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 23 issues on spherelabs.co, including 12 speed issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25