Website review, no card needed
spidertech.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202634 issues · 78 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on spidertech.com, 7 of them high impact, across 78 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 19.1 MB in 472 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
85B- #14,890 of 108,880 reviewed websitesbeats 82%
- #9,501 of 61,767 online storesbeats 79%
- #9,244 of 56,365 Shopify storesbeats 78%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 130 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 147 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.6 s
2.4 s
3.2 s
4.1 s
4.9 s
5.7 s
6.5 s
Speed
Main-thread work: 5.1 s
A phone's processor spends 5.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Shopify and Facebook and others), adding 2.7 MB and 906 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 63
63/100Your mobile performance score is 63. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
880 KiBAbout 880 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Render-blocking requests
800 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 800 ms.
Improve image delivery
723 KiB7 images could be 723 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Google Tag Manager adds 456 ms
456 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 456 ms of main-thread work and 1,014 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Shopify adds 273 ms
273 msShopify costs a phone 273 ms of main-thread work and 1.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,060 HTML elements
The page has 2,060 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 219 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 58 KiBAbout 58 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
193 KiB13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (193 KiB).
Legacy JavaScript
52 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 52 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 15 ms
15 msYour server sent the HTML in 15 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 24.5 s
24.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 24.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.3 s
7.3 sYour largest element takes 7.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Load video:”.
Speed Index: 6.8 s
6.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 6.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 316 ms
316 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 316 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
20 images without width and height
20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 130 ms to 147 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors wait 1.4 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.2 s
1.2 sThe first text or image appears after 1.2 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 19.1 MB in 472 requests
19.1 MBYour homepage downloads 19.1 MB in 472 requests on a phone: media 13.8 MB (1), scripts 2.4 MB (202) and images 1.4 MB (36). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
6 images below the first screen load straight away
6 images further down the page (417 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
1 image in older formats
1 image (90 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 5.4 g of CO₂ per visit
5.40 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 5.40 g of CO₂e: 648.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
5 images without alt text
5 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
21 links without text
21 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
1 checks passed
55 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 55 passed and 3 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (10 characters)
Your title is only 10 characters: “Spidertech”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Spidertech”, “Clinical Evidence Backing Every Application” and “Clinical Evidence Backing Every Application”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
61 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 61 pages on spidertech.com and 5 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 86 characters
Your meta description is 86 characters: “Science-driven pre-cut kinesiology tape supporting physical health and rehabilitation.”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.spidertech.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: FAQPage.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.spidertech.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,586 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.spidertech.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
2 pages share a title
https://www.spidertech.com/pages/build-your-own-bundle and https://www.spidertech.com/pages/starter-bundle all use the title “Starter Bundle – Spidertech”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
7 pages without a meta description
https://www.spidertech.com/pages/spidertech-tape-finder, https://www.spidertech.com/pages/pro-registration, https://www.spidertech.com/collections/all-products-2, https://www.spidertech.com/policies/shipping-policy, https://www.spidertech.com/collections/pro-cuts-1 and https://www.spidertech.com/collections/rolls and 1 other have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.spidertech.com/pages/build-your-own-bundle and https://www.spidertech.com/pages/starter-bundle use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.spidertech.com/pages/build-your-own-bundle, whose canonical is https://www.spidertech.com/pages/starter-bundle. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
12 pages without an H1
https://www.spidertech.com/collections/bundles, https://www.spidertech.com/pages/spidertech-tape-finder, https://www.spidertech.com/pages/pro-registration, https://www.spidertech.com/collections/all-products-2, https://www.spidertech.com/collections/pro-cuts-1 and https://www.spidertech.com/collections/rolls and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
14 of 15 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Only about 176 words
The homepage has only about 176 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
7 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SHOP TAPE”.
4 calls to action
The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Shop All”, “Shop tape” and “Learn more”.
4 short forms
4 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 110 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 4 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Meta Pixel.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
12 cookies set on arrival
12Opening the homepage sets 12 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
26 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at spidertech.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 13 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Blockify Fraud Filter · Judge Me Reviews · Uppromote Affiliate · Mida Replay Heatmaps · Triplewhale · Inbox · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Region Restrictions · Simple Bundle · Affliate By Secomapp · Forms · Bestpush · luckyorange.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Toronto
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on spidertech.com, including 14 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.