Website review, no card needed
starassurance.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202645 issues · 76 checks
This review found 45 issues worth fixing on starassurance.com, 22 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
61DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2026 | 9.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 9.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 9.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 9.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 10.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 11.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 10.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 10.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 10.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 10.1 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 9.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 9.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 9.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 9.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 224 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 199 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 231 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 239 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.4 s
2.0 s
2.7 s
3.4 s
4.1 s
4.8 s
5.5 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
7.0 s · 10.6 MB49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10.6 MB).
Improve image delivery
6.1 s · 2.5 MB6 images could be 2.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
5.0 s21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.0 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.5 s · 353 KiBAbout 353 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
1.1 s · 278 KiBAbout 278 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 42
42/100Your mobile performance score is 42. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, JSDelivr CDN and jQuery CDN and others), adding 8.1 MB and 524 ms of main-thread time.
platformstyles.com adds 21 ms
21 msplatformstyles.com costs a phone 21 ms of main-thread work and 7.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 353 ms
353 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 353 ms of main-thread work and 319 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.5 s
A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 982 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
12 long tasks on the main thread
12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 251 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
63 KiB63 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 9.5 s
9.5 sReal visitors wait 9.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 7.5 s
7.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 7.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 34.1 s
34.1 sYour largest element takes 34.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Helping you, your family, and your business stay protected.”.
Time to Interactive: 35.7 s
35.7 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 35.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.1 s
7.1 sThe first text or image appears after 7.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.4 s
10.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user INP: 232 ms
232 msReal visitors wait 232 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.15
0.15For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Total Blocking Time: 567 ms
567 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 567 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 198 ms to 239 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+2%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 9.3 s to 9.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007
0.007The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 14.0 MB in 115 requests
14.0 MBYour homepage downloads 14.0 MB in 115 requests on a phone: images 12.8 MB (40), scripts 807 KiB (25) and stylesheets 318 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 6.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
3 images in older formats
3 images (181 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (44 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 4.0 g of CO₂ per visit
3.98 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.98 g of CO₂e: 477.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
3 buttons without a name
3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
9 text elements with low contrast
9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Heading levels should only increase by one (6 elements)
Heading levels should only increase by one: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
1 checks passed
31 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is long (169 characters)
Your meta description is 169 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
5 checks passed
Title: 54 characters
Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Star Assurance | Reliable Insurance Solutions in Ghana”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.starassurance.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://starassurance.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Most text only appears after JavaScript runs
0%A phone browser shows 335 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://starassurance.com/llms.txt (3 KiB, 16 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
12 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 335 words of copy
The homepage carries about 335 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BUY INSURANCE”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
15 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at starassurance.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Nuxt
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- AWS
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 45 issues on starassurance.com, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.