Website review, no card needed

starassurance.com logo

starassurance.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 29 October 202645 issues · 76 checks

This review found 45 issues worth fixing on starassurance.com, 22 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
11.7 s8.9 sJun 20Oct 249.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
Jun 20, 20269.3 s
Jun 27, 20269.5 s
Jul 4, 20269.3 s
Jul 11, 20269.7 s
Jul 18, 202610.7 s
Jul 25, 202611.4 s
Sep 5, 202610.3 s
Sep 12, 202610.3 s
Sep 19, 202610.4 s
Sep 26, 202610.1 s
Oct 3, 20269.6 s
Oct 10, 20269.5 s
Oct 17, 20269.5 s
Oct 24, 20269.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
245 ms192 msJul 4Oct 24239 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
Jul 4, 2026198 ms
Jul 11, 2026199 ms
Jul 18, 2026208 ms
Sep 5, 2026227 ms
Sep 12, 2026224 ms
Sep 19, 2026227 ms
Oct 3, 2026199 ms
Oct 10, 2026231 ms
Oct 17, 2026231 ms
Oct 24, 2026239 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of starassurance.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. starassurance.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. starassurance.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. starassurance.com at 2.0 s2.0 s
  4. starassurance.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  5. starassurance.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  6. starassurance.com at 4.1 s4.1 s
  7. starassurance.com at 4.8 s4.8 s
  8. starassurance.com at 5.5 s5.5 s

Speed

11 to fix42
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    7.0 s · 10.6 MB

    49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10.6 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    6.1 s · 2.5 MB

    6 images could be 2.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    5.0 s

    21 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 5.0 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.5 s · 353 KiB

    About 353 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 278 KiB

    About 278 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 42

    42/100

    Your mobile performance score is 42. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, JSDelivr CDN and jQuery CDN and others), adding 8.1 MB and 524 ms of main-thread time.

  • platformstyles.com adds 21 ms

    21 ms

    platformstyles.com costs a phone 21 ms of main-thread work and 7.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 353 ms

    353 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 353 ms of main-thread work and 319 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 2.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 982 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 12 long tasks on the main thread

    12 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 251 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Minify CSS

    63 KiB

    63 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

11 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 9.5 s

    9.5 s

    Real visitors wait 9.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 7.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 34.1 s

    34.1 s

    Your largest element takes 34.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Helping you, your family, and your business stay protected.”.

  • Time to Interactive: 35.7 s

    35.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 35.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.1 s

    7.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 10.4 s

    10.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 10.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 232 ms

    232 ms

    Real visitors wait 232 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.15

    0.15

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.15 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 567 ms

    567 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 567 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 198 ms to 239 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 9.3 s to 9.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007

    0.007

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

2 to fix55
  • Page weight: 14.0 MB in 115 requests

    14.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 14.0 MB in 115 requests on a phone: images 12.8 MB (40), scripts 807 KiB (25) and stylesheets 318 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 6.7 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 3 images in older formats

    3 images (181 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (44 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    3.98 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.98 g of CO₂e: 477.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

9 to fixGoogle 7685
  • 3 buttons without a name

    3 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 9 text elements with low contrast

    9 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (12 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 12 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Heading levels should only increase by one (6 elements)

    Heading levels should only increase by one: 6 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • No page language

    The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.

1 checks passed
  • 31 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 38 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 31 passed and 7 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10079
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (169 characters)

    Your meta description is 169 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.

5 checks passed
  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Star Assurance | Reliable Insurance Solutions in Ghana”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.starassurance.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://starassurance.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix63
  • Most text only appears after JavaScript runs

    0%

    A phone browser shows 335 words, but the HTML your server sends has only 0. GPTBot, ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot read that HTML without running JavaScript, so they see an almost empty page. Server-side rendering or pre-rendering fixes it.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://starassurance.com/llms.txt (3 KiB, 16 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9291
  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Cannot read properties of null (reading 'addEventListener')”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    12 of 13 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix50
  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 335 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 335 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “BUY INSURANCE”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 15 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 15 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at starassurance.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
Nuxt
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
AWS

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 45 issues on starassurance.com, including 22 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25