Website review, no card needed
steinhospice.org website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202621 issues · 76 checks
This review found 21 issues worth fixing on steinhospice.org, 11 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
90AClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 78 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 78 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 78 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 79 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 78 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 86 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
12.0 s · 4.6 MB23 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.6 MB).
Improve image delivery
2.8 s · 3.4 MB9 images could be 3.4 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.8 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.
Mobile performance score: 62
62/100Your mobile performance score is 62 (desktop: 80). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
5 third-party services on the page
5 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Azure Web Services and Google Fonts and others), adding 369 KiB and 272 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 141 KiBAbout 141 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
4 long tasks on the main thread
4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 133 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
Reduce unused CSS
16 KiBAbout 16 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
15 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 15 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.8 s
A phone's processor spends 0.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 291 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 16.2 s
16.2 sYour largest element takes 16.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Man with bag, fist bumping man setting in chair.”.
Time to Interactive: 16.2 s
16.2 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 16.2 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.2 s
7.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors wait 1.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
3 images without width and height
3 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 78 ms to 86 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 96 ms
96 msReal visitors wait 96 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 32% faster for real visitors
-32%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 164 ms
164 msScripts block the page for only 164 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.029
0.029The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.029, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 7.0 MB in 33 requests
7.0 MBYour homepage downloads 7.0 MB in 33 requests on a phone: images 6.5 MB (17), scripts 391 KiB (4) and fonts 68 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images over 500 KB
5 images weigh 3.2 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images far larger than shown
1.3 MB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example DSC_8414_Hero_Desktop_1400x700.jpg at 1,400 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 1.3 MB.
9 images in older formats
9 images (4.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 2.0 g of CO₂ per visit
1.98 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.98 g of CO₂e: 238.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Accessibility
14 tap targets too small
14 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 1 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at reserve-care.org/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
69 internal links, 10 external
The homepage links to 69 pages on steinhospice.org and 10 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 143 characters
Your meta description is 143 characters: “Reserve Care provides hospice care, palliative care and grief support across Northern Ohio for patients, families and h…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Your Partners in Hospice and Palliative Care”.
Title: 59 characters
Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Your Partners in Hospice and Palliative Care | Reserve Care”.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: MedicalOrganization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://reserve-care.org/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://reserve-care.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (892 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 pages share a meta description
https://reserve-care.org/our-care-offerings/palliative-care and https://reserve-care.org/contact use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
8 pages slow to respond
https://reserve-care.org/healthcare-professionals, https://reserve-care.org/our-care-offerings, https://reserve-care.org/our-care-offerings/hospice-care, https://reserve-care.org/our-care-offerings/palliative-care, https://reserve-care.org/our-care-offerings/grief-support-services and https://reserve-care.org/contact and 2 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 30 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
18 of 18 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 13 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 688 words of copy
The homepage carries about 688 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Reserve Care, navigate to home page” and “Call Now 800.707.8922”.
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Reserve Care, navigate to home page”, “Contact Us” and “Call to Refer 800.707.8922”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
3 trackers load before any consent
3Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
3 cookies set on arrival
3Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
8 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 8 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at steinhospice.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 21 issues on steinhospice.org, including 11 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.