Website review, no card needed
stromasys.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202618 issues · 76 checks
This review found 18 issues worth fixing on stromasys.com, 6 of them high impact, across 76 checks. The most urgent: fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
89BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 164 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 164 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 188 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 188 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 178 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 152 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 129 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 146 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 144 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
nitrocdn.com adds 0 ms
0 msnitrocdn.com costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 601 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
102 KiBAbout 102 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
2 third-party services on the page
2 third-party services load with your homepage (nitrocdn.com and Google Fonts), adding 644 KiB and 0 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 90
90/100Your mobile performance score is 90 (desktop: 98). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.5 s
A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 82 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 29 ms
29 msYour server sent the HTML in 29 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 3.0 s
3.0 sReal visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s
1.6 sReal visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sYour largest element takes 3.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Eliminate the Legacy Hardware Risks Stromasys hardware virt…”.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-6%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.4 s to 3.4 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Real-user INP: 141 ms
141 msReal visitors wait 141 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 12% faster for real visitors
-12%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 164 ms to 144 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Time to Interactive: 3.7 s
3.7 sThe page is fully interactive after 3.7 s.
First Contentful Paint: 1.3 s
1.3 sThe first text or image appears after 1.3 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Speed Index: 1.3 s
1.3 sVisually, the page fills in at 1.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.43 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.43 g of CO₂e: 52.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
4 checks passed
Page weight: 1.5 MB in 66 requests
1.5 MBYour homepage downloads 1.5 MB in 66 requests on a phone: other files 841 KiB (49), fonts 266 KiB (8) and images 265 KiB (3). That is a lean page.
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
16 tap targets too small
16 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA commands must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA commands must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (29 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 29 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 67 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
4 links with vague text
4 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
155 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 155 pages on stromasys.com and 5 external pages.
8 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “Maximize your business performance by seamlessly transitioning your aging legacy system like Sun SPARC, VAX, DEC Alpha,…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Eliminate the Legacy Hardware Risks”.
Title: 60 characters
Your title is a healthy 60 characters: “Emulation solution for Sun SPARC, VAX, Alpha legacy hardware”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.stromasys.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.stromasys.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,386 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.stromasys.com/llms.txt (65 KiB, 431 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 57 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 890 words of copy
The homepage carries about 890 words of visible text.
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Download Datasheet” and “Talk to an Expert”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Download Datasheet”, “Contact Us” and “Book a Demo”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 1 testimonial or review block, 10 customer or partner logos and 1 trust badge.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at stromasys.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 18 issues on stromasys.com, including 6 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.