Website review, no card needed

studies-overseas.com logo

studies-overseas.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202632 issues · 81 checks

This review found 32 issues worth fixing on studies-overseas.com, 10 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.7 s1.9 sMay 9Oct 242.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.5 s
Jun 6, 20262.5 s
Jun 13, 20262.6 s
Jun 20, 20262.6 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.4 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.2 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.3 s
Aug 22, 20262.2 s
Aug 29, 20262.2 s
Sep 5, 20262.2 s
Sep 12, 20262.2 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20262.0 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20262.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
240 ms181 msMay 9Oct 24233 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026188 ms
May 16, 2026189 ms
May 23, 2026198 ms
May 30, 2026203 ms
Jun 6, 2026204 ms
Jun 13, 2026201 ms
Jun 20, 2026193 ms
Jun 27, 2026189 ms
Jul 4, 2026188 ms
Jul 11, 2026191 ms
Jul 18, 2026194 ms
Jul 25, 2026194 ms
Aug 1, 2026195 ms
Aug 8, 2026203 ms
Aug 15, 2026203 ms
Aug 22, 2026204 ms
Aug 29, 2026210 ms
Sep 5, 2026209 ms
Sep 12, 2026208 ms
Sep 19, 2026207 ms
Sep 26, 2026210 ms
Oct 3, 2026211 ms
Oct 10, 2026220 ms
Oct 17, 2026229 ms
Oct 24, 2026233 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of studies-overseas.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. studies-overseas.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. studies-overseas.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. studies-overseas.com at 1.6 s1.6 s
  4. studies-overseas.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  5. studies-overseas.com at 2.7 s2.7 s
  6. studies-overseas.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  7. studies-overseas.com at 3.8 s3.8 s
  8. studies-overseas.com at 4.3 s4.3 s

Speed

8 to fix55
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.4 s · 917 KiB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (917 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 492 KiB

    About 492 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 55

    55/100

    Your mobile performance score is 55. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Facebook, Google Tag Manager and Clarity and others), adding 700 KiB and 584 ms of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    500 ms

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 500 ms.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 427 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Improve image delivery

    309 KiB

    1 image could be 309 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    200 ms · 36 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 36 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 200 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 30 KiB

    About 30 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Minify JavaScript

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 3 ms

    3 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 3 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.5 s

    13.5 s

    Your largest element takes 13.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “study abroad”.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.6 s

    16.6 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.0 s

    7.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user INP: 217 ms

    217 ms

    Real visitors wait 217 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 23% slower for real visitors

    +23%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 188 ms to 233 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 877 ms

    877 ms

    Real visitors wait 877 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 506 ms

    506 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 506 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.01

    0.01

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

  • First Contentful Paint: 0.8 s

    0.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 0.8 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 2.3 MB in 115 requests

    2.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.3 MB in 115 requests on a phone: scripts 1.3 MB (39), images 729 KiB (23) and fonts 102 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    216 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example 0012000000UQ2hwAAD_badge.png at 650 px wide, shown at 120 px. Resized copies would save about 216 KiB.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (312 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • 2 images in older formats

    2 images (362 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.65 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.65 g of CO₂e: 77.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9292
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Frames without titles

    1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (5 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 8 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 44 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 4 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

Google 100100
  • 45 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 45 pages on studies-overseas.com and 13 external pages.

8 checks passed
  • Meta description: 120 characters

    Your meta description is 120 characters: “KC Overseas Education is the best Study Abroad Consultant in India, helping students with Higher Education Abroad dreams”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “We are bringing overseas education within everyone’s reach”.

  • Title: 53 characters

    Your title is a healthy 53 characters: “KC Overseas Education - Best Study Abroad Consultants”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.studies-overseas.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.studies-overseas.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (274 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.studies-overseas.com/llms.txt (26 KiB, 119 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix80
  • 1 page without a title

    https://www.studies-overseas.com/check-email has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 1 page without a meta description

    https://www.studies-overseas.com/check-email has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://www.studies-overseas.com/check-email has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 32 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 7371
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=187199173&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=7cc21783-aa1a-42b6-9aee-4ac0e69b8c57&bo=1&sid=dc01fda0d49411f1868adfea1ae824a2&vid=dc023460d49411f1b2f6c15f28f968e6&vids=1&msclkid=N&gtm_.

  • 2 small tap targets

    2 of 9 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 6 JavaScript errors while loading

    6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix92
  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 255 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 255 words of visible text.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start Your Journey”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”, “Book Online Counselling” and “Start Your Journey”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: a star rating and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 24 cookies set on arrival

    24

    Opening the homepage sets 24 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 37 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 37 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at studies-overseas.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Vercel

Company

Founded
1998
Headquarters
Nagpur

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 32 issues on studies-overseas.com, including 17 speed issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25