Website review, no card needed
stylecncmachines.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 21 October 202615 issues · 69 checks
This review found 15 issues worth fixing on stylecncmachines.com, 3 of them high impact, across 69 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 9.7 MB in 34 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
93AClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 86 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 89 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 91 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 99 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 96 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
550 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 550 ms.
Improve image delivery
342 KiB3 images could be 342 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused JavaScript
49 KiBAbout 49 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Reduce unused CSS
41 KiBAbout 41 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Legacy JavaScript
7 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 7 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
3 checks passed
Mobile performance score: 99
99/100Your mobile performance score is 99 (desktop: 98). That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).
Main-thread work: 0.5 s
A phone's processor spends 0.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 152 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 213 ms
213 msYour server sent the HTML in 213 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Tap response (INP) got 13% slower for real visitors
+13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 86 ms to 96 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
11 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 51% faster for real visitors
-51%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.7 s
1.7 sThe first text or image appears after 1.7 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Largest Contentful Paint: 1.9 s
1.9 sYour largest element renders in 1.9 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “An accessible control for the novice operator with extensiv…”.
Speed Index: 2.4 s
2.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 2.4 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 1.9 s
1.9 sThe page is fully interactive after 1.9 s.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.7 MB in 34 requests
9.7 MBYour homepage downloads 9.7 MB in 34 requests on a phone: media 8.3 MB (2), images 1,000 KiB (16) and fonts 164 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 2.7 g of CO₂ per visit
2.74 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.74 g of CO₂e: 328.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
All page content should be contained by landmarks (11 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Document should not have more than one banner landmark (1 element)
Document should not have more than one banner landmark: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 13 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
34 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 39 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 34 passed and 5 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
41 internal links, 6 external
The homepage links to 41 pages on stylecncmachines.com and 6 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 148 characters
Your meta description is 148 characters: “STYLE: manufacturer of CNC turning and milling machines, CNC slantbed bed and machining centers, from development to en…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Top 12 stock machines”.
Title: 46 characters
Your title is a healthy 46 characters: “STYLE CNC Machines | Dutch CNC machine builder”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.stylecncmachines.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.stylecncmachines.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.stylecncmachines.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (462 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page points its canonical at the homepage
https://www.stylecncmachines.com/style-cnc-machines-verovert-friesland declares the homepage as its canonical URL, which tells Google it is a copy of the homepage and keeps it out of search results. A site-wide template setting usually causes this.
2 pages share a title
/ and https://www.stylecncmachines.com/style-cnc-machines-verovert-friesland all use the title “STYLE CNC Machines | Dutch CNC machine builder”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 26 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
9 of 9 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 3 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 440 words of copy
The homepage carries about 440 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
3 calls to action
The homepage has 3 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
1 short form
A short form (2 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 4 email links.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at stylecncmachines.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 15 issues on stylecncmachines.com, including 2 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.