Website review, no card needed
stylestore.com.ar website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202644 issues · 87 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on stylestore.com.ar, 22 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
56FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 4.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 5.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 5.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 260 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 242 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 225 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 218 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 220 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 272 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 266 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 250 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 246 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 239 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 245 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 251 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 244 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 241 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 237 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 231 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.4 s
2.8 s
4.3 s
5.7 s
7.1 s
8.5 s
9.9 s
11.4 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
6.7 s · 1.6 MBAbout 1.6 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 6.7 s faster on a phone.
ThreatMetrix adds 4.7 s
4.7 sThreatMetrix costs a phone 4.7 s of main-thread work and 267 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
1.2 s · 616 KiB9 images could be 616 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
Google CDN adds 1.6 s
1.6 sGoogle CDN costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 17.2 s
A phone's processor spends 17.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 12.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.6 s
1.6 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.6 s of main-thread work and 852 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 441 KiB22 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (441 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 2
2/100Your mobile performance score is 2 (desktop: 29). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (ThreatMetrix, Google Tag Manager and Google CDN and others), adding 4.8 MB and 9.5 s of main-thread time.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.8 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
vtexassets.com adds 956 ms
956 msvtexassets.com costs a phone 956 ms of main-thread work and 1.9 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 76 KiBAbout 76 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
300 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 300 ms.
Facebook adds 271 ms
271 msFacebook costs a phone 271 ms of main-thread work and 228 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
250 ms · 47 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 250 ms faster on a phone.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 29 but mobile only 2. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 54 ms
54 msYour server sent the HTML in 54 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user CLS: 0.85
0.85For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.85 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Largest Contentful Paint: 29.2 s
29.2 sYour largest element takes 29.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Relojes Tommy Hilfiger”.
Speed Index: 23.4 s
23.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 23.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 8.6 s
8.6 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 8.6 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Time to Interactive: 40.4 s
40.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 40.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.859
0.859The layout shifts by 0.859 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
First Contentful Paint: 5.0 s
5.0 sThe first text or image appears after 5.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 819 ms
819 msReal visitors wait 819 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
19 images without width and height
19 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 260 ms to 231 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors
+13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.0 s to 5.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Real-user INP: 193 ms
193 msReal visitors wait 193 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.5 MB in 189 requests
6.5 MBYour homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 189 requests on a phone: scripts 3.8 MB (84), other files 1.1 MB (51) and images 948 KiB (30). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit
1.85 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.85 g of CO₂e: 222.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
4 buttons without a name
4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
Hidden but focusable
2 elements hidden from screen readers can still receive keyboard focus.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (4 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 4 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
8 links without text
8 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 22 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
35 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 40 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 35 passed and 5 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
38 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 38 pages on stylestore.com.ar and 1 external page.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 137 characters
Your meta description is 137 characters: “Experience is the new luxury. Comprá online lo último de las mejores marcas internacionales al alcance de un click. Des…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Experience is the New Luxury”.
Title: 42 characters
Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “Style Store | Experience is the new luxury”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.stylestore.com.ar/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at http://www.stylestore.com.ar/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.stylestore.com.ar/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
2 pages with very little text
https://www.stylestore.com.ar/servicio-tecnico and https://www.stylestore.com.ar/wishlist have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
9 pages slow to respond
https://www.stylestore.com.ar/sale, https://www.stylestore.com.ar/coleccion-relojes, https://www.stylestore.com.ar/joyeria, https://www.stylestore.com.ar/relojes/smartwatches, https://www.stylestore.com.ar/eyewear and https://www.stylestore.com.ar/style-home and 3 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 18 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'register')”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
68 of 76 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 124 words
The homepage has only about 124 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
19 cookies set on arrival
19Opening the homepage sets 19 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
48 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 48 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at stylestore.com.ar, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Gigared S.A.
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on stylestore.com.ar, including 26 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.