Website review, no card needed
sugamgroup.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202643 issues · 93 checks
This review found 43 issues worth fixing on sugamgroup.com, 19 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
77CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 4.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 4.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 4.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.6 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.7 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 183 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 185 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 180 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 184 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 191 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 188 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 187 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 192 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 197 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 201 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 207 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 210 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.4 s
2.1 s
2.9 s
3.6 s
4.3 s
5.0 s
5.7 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
8.1 s · 978 KiBAbout 978 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.3 s · 482 KiB45 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (482 KiB).
Render-blocking requests
1.4 s14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.
Reduce unused CSS
1.1 s · 232 KiBAbout 232 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 4.7 s
A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (nitrocdn.com, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 3.5 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 57
57/100Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
50 ms · 608 KiB4 images could be 608 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.
nitrocdn.com adds 490 ms
490 msnitrocdn.com costs a phone 490 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 396 ms
396 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 396 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Tag Manager adds 214 ms
214 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 214 ms of main-thread work and 499 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,485 HTML elements
The page has 2,485 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 27 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 118 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 220 ms
220 msYour server sent the HTML in 220 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user FCP: 3.2 s
3.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s
2.0 sReal visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 25.5 s
25.5 sYour largest element takes 25.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 25.8 s
25.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 11.6 s
11.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 11.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.9 s
3.9 sReal visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Total Blocking Time: 301 ms
301 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 301 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s
2.0 sThe first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors
+14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 183 ms to 210 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 126 ms
126 msReal visitors wait 126 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005
0.005The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.1 MB in 125 requests
5.1 MBYour homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 125 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (60), images 1.4 MB (34) and fonts 439 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit
1.43 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.43 g of CO₂e: 171.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Invalid ARIA attributes
1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)
Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
15 images without alt text
15 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (1 element)
Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
48 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 12 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, LocalBusiness and Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: sameAs is an empty list”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
2 links with vague text
2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
86 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 86 pages on sugamgroup.com and 8 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 143 characters
Your meta description is 143 characters: “Sugam Parivahan is the best transport company in India. Contact us for efficient India - Nepal transport Services and s…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Delivering Trust Since 1950s”.
Title: 55 characters
Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Sugam Group | Sugam Logistics | Sugam Parivahan Pvt Ltd”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.sugamgroup.com/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sugamgroup.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.sugamgroup.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,769 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.sugamgroup.com/sugam-logistics-services, whose canonical is https://www.sugamgroup.com/sugam-logistics-service. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://www.sugamgroup.com/sugam-logistics-services has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “$ is not a function”.
2 distorted images
2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
2 low-resolution images
2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
19 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
A 71-field form
Your longest form asks for 71 fields (57 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
About 727 words of copy
The homepage carries about 727 words of visible text.
8 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Get A Quote”.
18 calls to action
The homepage has 18 calls to action, for example “Get Quote”, “Apply For A Job” and “Apply For A Franchise”.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 8 testimonial or review blocks, 1 trust badge and “0 + Customers”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
5 cookies set on arrival
5Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
12 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sugamgroup.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2020.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- React
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Namecheap
Hiring
- Hiring
- 1 open role
- Job board
- careers page
- Careers page
- www.sugamgroup.com/jobs (opens in a new tab)
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 43 issues on sugamgroup.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.