Website review, no card needed

sugamgroup.com logo

sugamgroup.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202643 issues · 93 checks

This review found 43 issues worth fixing on sugamgroup.com, 19 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.9 s3.3 sMay 16Oct 313.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20263.8 s
May 23, 20263.8 s
May 30, 20263.9 s
Jun 6, 20263.9 s
Jun 13, 20263.9 s
Jun 20, 20263.9 s
Jun 27, 20264.0 s
Jul 4, 20264.1 s
Jul 11, 20264.0 s
Jul 18, 20264.0 s
Jul 25, 20263.9 s
Aug 1, 20264.3 s
Aug 8, 20264.7 s
Aug 15, 20264.7 s
Aug 22, 20264.7 s
Aug 29, 20264.4 s
Sep 5, 20264.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.9 s
Sep 19, 20263.8 s
Sep 26, 20263.7 s
Oct 3, 20263.6 s
Oct 10, 20263.5 s
Oct 17, 20263.5 s
Oct 24, 20263.6 s
Oct 31, 20263.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
215 ms176 msMay 16Oct 31210 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026183 ms
May 23, 2026185 ms
May 30, 2026182 ms
Jun 6, 2026185 ms
Jun 13, 2026182 ms
Jun 20, 2026180 ms
Jun 27, 2026184 ms
Jul 4, 2026187 ms
Jul 11, 2026191 ms
Jul 18, 2026198 ms
Jul 25, 2026200 ms
Aug 1, 2026197 ms
Aug 8, 2026194 ms
Aug 15, 2026190 ms
Aug 22, 2026190 ms
Aug 29, 2026188 ms
Sep 5, 2026187 ms
Sep 12, 2026189 ms
Sep 19, 2026192 ms
Sep 26, 2026197 ms
Oct 3, 2026201 ms
Oct 10, 2026203 ms
Oct 17, 2026207 ms
Oct 24, 2026208 ms
Oct 31, 2026210 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of sugamgroup.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sugamgroup.com at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. sugamgroup.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. sugamgroup.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. sugamgroup.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  5. sugamgroup.com at 3.6 s3.6 s
  6. sugamgroup.com at 4.3 s4.3 s
  7. sugamgroup.com at 5.0 s5.0 s
  8. sugamgroup.com at 5.7 s5.7 s

Speed

12 to fix57
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    8.1 s · 978 KiB

    About 978 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.3 s · 482 KiB

    45 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (482 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.4 s

    14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.4 s.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    1.1 s · 232 KiB

    About 232 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 4.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 4.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.5 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (nitrocdn.com, Google CDN and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 3.5 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.

  • Mobile performance score: 57

    57/100

    Your mobile performance score is 57. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Improve image delivery

    50 ms · 608 KiB

    4 images could be 608 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 50 ms faster on a phone.

  • nitrocdn.com adds 490 ms

    490 ms

    nitrocdn.com costs a phone 490 ms of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google CDN adds 396 ms

    396 ms

    Google CDN costs a phone 396 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 214 ms

    214 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 214 ms of main-thread work and 499 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 2,485 HTML elements

    The page has 2,485 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 27 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 27 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 13 long tasks on the main thread

    13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 118 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 220 ms

    220 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 220 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

9 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.2 s

    3.2 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors wait 2.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 25.5 s

    25.5 s

    Your largest element takes 25.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.8 s

    25.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 11.6 s

    11.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 11.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Real visitors wait 3.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 301 ms

    301 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 301 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% slower for real visitors

    +14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 183 ms to 210 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.8 s to 3.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 126 ms

    126 ms

    Real visitors wait 126 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.005

    0.005

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.005, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.1 MB in 125 requests

    5.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.1 MB in 125 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (60), images 1.4 MB (34) and fonts 439 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 1.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.43 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.43 g of CO₂e: 171.8 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 7184
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)

    Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (1 element)

    ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.

  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (2 elements)

    ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Interactive controls must not be nested (1 element)

    Interactive controls must not be nested: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 15 images without alt text

    15 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • 4 links without text

    4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored (1 element)

    Elements marked as presentational should be consistently ignored: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h2 → h4 and h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 60 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 12 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 8591
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (BreadcrumbList, FAQPage, LocalBusiness and Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: sameAs is an empty list”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 2 links with vague text

    2 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 86 internal links, 8 external

    The homepage links to 86 pages on sugamgroup.com and 8 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 143 characters

    Your meta description is 143 characters: “Sugam Parivahan is the best transport company in India. Contact us for efficient India - Nepal transport Services and s…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Delivering Trust Since 1950s”.

  • Title: 55 characters

    Your title is a healthy 55 characters: “Sugam Group | Sugam Logistics | Sugam Parivahan Pvt Ltd”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.sugamgroup.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sugamgroup.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.sugamgroup.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,769 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://www.sugamgroup.com/sugam-logistics-services, whose canonical is https://www.sugamgroup.com/sugam-logistics-service. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 1 page without an H1

    https://www.sugamgroup.com/sugam-logistics-services has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 37 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 8891
  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “$ is not a function”.

  • 2 distorted images

    2 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.

  • 2 low-resolution images

    2 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    19 of 22 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix94
  • A 71-field form

    Your longest form asks for 71 fields (57 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • About 727 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 727 words of visible text.

8 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us” and “Get A Quote”.

  • 18 calls to action

    The homepage has 18 calls to action, for example “Get Quote”, “Apply For A Job” and “Apply For A Franchise”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 8 testimonial or review blocks, 1 trust badge and “0 + Customers”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • LocalBusiness structured data

    Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 4 trackers load before any consent

    4

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 5 cookies set on arrival

    5

    Opening the homepage sets 5 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sugamgroup.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2020.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
React
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Namecheap

Hiring

Hiring
1 open role
Job board
careers page

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 43 issues on sugamgroup.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25