Website review, no card needed
sun-sentinel.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202650 issues · 98 checks
This review found 50 issues worth fixing on sun-sentinel.com, 18 of them high impact, across 98 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 271 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 270 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 253 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 243 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 257 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 262 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 263 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 258 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 252 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 259 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 261 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 260 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 255 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 254 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 248 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 242 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 238 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 228 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 227 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 221 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 219 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 221 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.4 s
2.7 s
4.1 s
5.4 s
6.8 s
8.1 s
9.5 s
10.8 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
3.7 s · 3.0 MBAbout 3.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.7 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.0 s · 2.4 MB178 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (2.4 MB).
Render-blocking requests
4.5 s29 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.5 s.
Main-thread work: 18.0 s
A phone's processor spends 18.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 11.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.0 s
1.0 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.0 s of main-thread work and 900 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 18
18/100Your mobile performance score is 18. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, cloudfront.net and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 4.0 MB and 4.5 s of main-thread time.
Improve image delivery
400 ms · 954 KiB20 images could be 954 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.
cloudfront.net adds 881 ms
881 mscloudfront.net costs a phone 881 ms of main-thread work and 79 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 613 ms
613 msGoogle/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 613 ms of main-thread work and 802 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Osano CMP adds 509 ms
509 msOsano CMP costs a phone 509 ms of main-thread work and 121 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Ad Lightning adds 483 ms
483 msAd Lightning costs a phone 483 ms of main-thread work and 201 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
300 ms · 140 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 140 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 414 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
1,770 HTML elements
The page has 1,770 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
Minify JavaScript
14 KiB14 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Reduce unused CSS
11 KiBAbout 11 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 30 ms
30 msYour server sent the HTML in 30 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 22.3 s
22.3 sYour largest element takes 22.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Gov. Ron DeSantis is planning to run for president in 2028 …”.
Speed Index: 25.1 s
25.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 25.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 74.9 s
74.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 74.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.7 s
2.7 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.7 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 4.9 s
4.9 sThe first text or image appears after 4.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.23
0.23For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.23 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.193
0.193The layout shifts by 0.193 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
4 images without width and height
4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+1%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.3 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 170 ms
170 msReal visitors wait 170 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 19% faster for real visitors
-19%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 271 ms to 221 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.1 MB in 1,141 requests
11.1 MBYour homepage downloads 11.1 MB in 1,141 requests on a phone: scripts 6.9 MB (197), images 2.5 MB (322) and other files 765 KiB (530). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
3 images far larger than shown
537 KiB3 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example TFL-L-sun-sentinel-store-back-issues-folded.jpg at 2,491 px wide, shown at 148 px. Resized copies would save about 537 KiB.
16 images below the first screen load straight away
16 images further down the page (974 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
10 images in older formats
10 images (416 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 3.1 g of CO₂ per visit
3.14 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.14 g of CO₂e: 376.9 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Images must have alternative text (14 elements)
Images must have alternative text: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 checks passed
45 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 4 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (111 characters)
Your title is 111 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Sun Sentinel: Your source for South Florida breaking news, sports, business, entertainmen…”.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Sun Sentinel” and “”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
2 links crawlers can't follow
2 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is set, so this is minor.
247 internal links, 55 external
The homepage links to 247 pages on sun-sentinel.com and 55 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 152 characters
Your meta description is 152 characters: “The Sun Sentinel is the leading source of breaking news, local news, sports, business, entertainment, lifestyle and opi…”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.sun-sentinel.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: LocalBusiness and NewsMediaOrganization.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sun-sentinel.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
robots.txt blocks 6 AI answer engine crawlers
6 of 6Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User), Claude search (Claude-SearchBot), Claude (Claude-User), Perplexity (PerplexityBot) and Perplexity (Perplexity-User). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.sun-sentinel.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.
2 checks passed
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,020 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/newsletters has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
5 pages without a meta description
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/util-clean-cookies, https://www.sun-sentinel.com/newsletters, https://www.sun-sentinel.com/location/florida/broward-county, https://www.sun-sentinel.com/location/florida/palm-beach-county and https://www.sun-sentinel.com/location/florida/miami-dade-county have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
3 pages without an H1
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/util-clean-cookies, https://www.sun-sentinel.com/newsletters and https://www.sun-sentinel.com/weather have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.sun-sentinel.com/util-clean-cookies has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 156 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Best practices
4 broken images
4 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://rtb.mfadsrvr.com/sync?ssp=revcontent&ssp_user_id=5aff990073a244cb80bf8685af0aa0f4&gpp=DBACOe~CQtUCQAQtUCQAEX1iAENC3FgAAAAAEPgACiQAAAUlgIgAVAA4ACQAGgARQAmABoAEcAK0AZYBAACDgLzAaKA5YB8YFJQAAAA.IL.
27 third-party cookies
27 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 2 deprecated browser APIs that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_TUNNEL_CONNECTION_FAILED”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Requests the notification permission on page load
Requests the notification permission on page load.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
111 of 115 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,785 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,785 words of visible text.
6 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Subscribe Now” and “Sign Up for Newsletters”.
12 calls to action
The homepage has 12 calls to action, for example “Subscribe Now”, “Sign Up for Newsletters” and “Sign Up”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
LocalBusiness structured data
Your homepage describes the business with LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants can read its address, hours and phone reliably.
Privacy and tracking
8 trackers load before any consent
8Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Comscore, Criteo, Google Ads and Google Analytics and 3 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (Osano) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
36 cookies set on arrival
36Opening the homepage sets 36 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
90 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 90 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: Osano
A consent management tool (Osano) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sun-sentinel.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- React
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- WordPress.com
Company
- Founded
- 2000
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 50 issues on sun-sentinel.com, including 27 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.