Website review, no card needed
sunbridge.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202630 issues · 81 checks
This review found 30 issues worth fixing on sunbridge.com, 11 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
80BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.5 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 85 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 81 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 84 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 85 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 81 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 89 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 93 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 123 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
1.1 s
2.2 s
3.4 s
4.5 s
5.6 s
6.7 s
7.8 s
9.0 s
Speed
Improve image delivery
2.1 s · 220 KiB3 images could be 220 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 43
43/100Your mobile performance score is 43. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.1 s
A phone's processor spends 9.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
7 third-party services on the page
7 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Pardot and others), adding 5.3 MB and 706 ms of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
750 ms · 357 KiBAbout 357 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 198 KiB2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (198 KiB).
Google Tag Manager adds 505 ms
505 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 505 ms of main-thread work and 537 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google Fonts adds 0 ms
0 msGoogle Fonts costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 4.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 49 KiBAbout 49 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 257 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 12 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 12 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Minify JavaScript
30 KiB30 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Minify CSS
7 KiB7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
First Contentful Paint: 25.5 s
25.5 sThe first text or image appears after 25.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 28.1 s
28.1 sYour largest element takes 28.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “REDEFINING THE WAY WE WORK THROUGH TECHNOLOGY.”.
Speed Index: 25.5 s
25.5 sVisually, the page fills in at 25.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 28.1 s
28.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 39% slower for real visitors
+39%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 85 ms to 123 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 944 ms
944 msReal visitors wait 944 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.243
0.243The layout shifts by 0.243 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
20 images without width and height
20 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors wait 1.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 123 ms
123 msReal visitors wait 123 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.4 s
1.4 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.4 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 43% faster for real visitors
-43%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 1.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 0 ms
0 msScripts block the page for only 0 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 5.8 MB in 76 requests
5.8 MBYour homepage downloads 5.8 MB in 76 requests on a phone: fonts 4.5 MB (31), scripts 940 KiB (13) and images 303 KiB (21). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images in older formats
2 images (274 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit
1.64 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.64 g of CO₂e: 196.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
4 links without text
4 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Headings should not be empty (5 elements)
Headings should not be empty: 5 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 31 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
29 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 33 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 29 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
One H1 headline
Your <h1> is empty.
62 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 62 pages on sunbridge.com and 4 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 119 characters
Your meta description is 119 characters: “サンブリッジでは、見込客の獲得から育成・営業活動までのフローに沿ったプロセス管理やデータ管理をマルチクラウドでご提供しており、 導入時の設計・設定から導入後の定着化支援まで、企業が安定した運用を実現できるよう幅広いご支援を行っております。”.
Title: 51 characters
Your title is a healthy 51 characters: “株式会社サンブリッジ|Salesforce開発/導入活用支援・マーケティングオートメーション・名刺管理”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.sunbridge.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: CollectionPage, Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sunbridge.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.sunbridge.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Other pages
11 pages with very little text
https://www.sunbridge.com/about, https://www.sunbridge.com/service/sales-cloud, https://www.sunbridge.com/service/service-cloud, https://www.sunbridge.com/service/experience-cloud, https://www.sunbridge.com/service/account-engagement and https://www.sunbridge.com/service/marketing-cloud and 5 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
7 pages slow to respond
https://www.sunbridge.com/service, https://www.sunbridge.com/service/service-cloud, https://www.sunbridge.com/service/experience-cloud, https://www.sunbridge.com/service/account-engagement, https://www.sunbridge.com/service/salesforce-data-cloud and https://www.sunbridge.com/service/crm-analytics and 1 other took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
7 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 11 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 6 customer or partner logos. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 116 words
The homepage has only about 116 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact”.
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Contact”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
11 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sunbridge.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 30 issues on sunbridge.com, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.