Website review, no card needed

sunriver.org logo

sunriver.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202641 issues · 84 checks

This review found 41 issues worth fixing on sunriver.org, 17 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.3 s2.1 sMay 9Oct 243.1 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.4 s
May 23, 20262.4 s
May 30, 20262.4 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.4 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.5 s
Jul 11, 20262.3 s
Jul 18, 20262.3 s
Jul 25, 20262.3 s
Aug 1, 20262.3 s
Aug 8, 20262.4 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20263.0 s
Sep 5, 20263.0 s
Sep 12, 20263.0 s
Sep 19, 20262.8 s
Sep 26, 20262.6 s
Oct 3, 20262.8 s
Oct 10, 20263.0 s
Oct 17, 20263.1 s
Oct 24, 20263.1 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
194 ms167 msMay 9Oct 24183 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026170 ms
May 16, 2026170 ms
May 23, 2026171 ms
May 30, 2026171 ms
Jun 6, 2026172 ms
Jun 13, 2026176 ms
Jun 20, 2026175 ms
Jun 27, 2026177 ms
Jul 4, 2026173 ms
Jul 11, 2026171 ms
Jul 18, 2026173 ms
Jul 25, 2026172 ms
Aug 1, 2026174 ms
Aug 8, 2026179 ms
Aug 15, 2026181 ms
Aug 22, 2026188 ms
Aug 29, 2026191 ms
Sep 5, 2026188 ms
Sep 12, 2026186 ms
Sep 19, 2026190 ms
Sep 26, 2026187 ms
Oct 3, 2026186 ms
Oct 10, 2026187 ms
Oct 17, 2026182 ms
Oct 24, 2026183 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of sunriver.org (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. sunriver.org at 0.7 s0.7 s
  2. sunriver.org at 1.4 s1.4 s
  3. sunriver.org at 2.1 s2.1 s
  4. sunriver.org at 2.8 s2.8 s
  5. sunriver.org at 3.5 s3.5 s
  6. sunriver.org at 4.2 s4.2 s
  7. sunriver.org at 4.9 s4.9 s
  8. sunriver.org at 5.7 s5.7 s

Speed

11 to fix34
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    8.4 s · 1.5 MB

    About 1.5 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 8.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    2.5 s · 428 KiB

    21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (428 KiB).

  • Render-blocking requests

    2.9 s

    25 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.9 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 1.5 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.2 s · 213 KiB

    2 images could be 213 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 34

    34/100

    Your mobile performance score is 34. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.6 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, px-cloud.net and YouTube and others), adding 3.1 MB and 3.1 s of main-thread time.

  • YouTube adds 599 ms

    599 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 599 ms of main-thread work and 976 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • px-cloud.net adds 623 ms

    623 ms

    px-cloud.net costs a phone 623 ms of main-thread work and 203 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 286 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    236 KiB

    About 236 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 35 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 35 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    51 KiB

    51 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Minify CSS

    7 KiB

    7 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 4 ms

    4 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 34.6 s

    34.6 s

    Your largest element takes 34.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Vaccine information English 2”.

  • Time to Interactive: 34.7 s

    34.7 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 34.7 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 8.6 s

    8.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 201 ms

    201 ms

    Real visitors wait 201 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.17

    0.17

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 26% slower for real visitors

    +26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 3.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user FCP: 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 960 ms

    960 ms

    Real visitors wait 960 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 170 ms to 183 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.072

    0.072

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.072, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix40
  • Page weight: 5.7 MB in 240 requests

    5.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.7 MB in 240 requests on a phone: scripts 3.4 MB (88), images 1.6 MB (50) and fonts 298 KiB (15). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images far larger than shown

    781 KiB

    8 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example SPA-rev2-Medicaid-man-Re-enrollment-Video-screens-SRH26-0817 at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 781 KiB.

  • 8 images in older formats

    8 images (1.2 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.60 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.60 g of CO₂e: 192.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9296
  • 8 tap targets too small

    8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Frames without titles

    2 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 60 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 46 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 49 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 3 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 8581
  • Title is short (23 characters)

    Your title is only 23 characters: “Home - Sun River Health”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is long (228 characters)

    Your meta description is 228 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 5 links crawlers can't follow

    5 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 119 internal links, 86 external

    The homepage links to 119 pages on sunriver.org and 86 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “The care you need. The respect you deserve.”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.sunriver.org/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sunriver.org/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.sunriver.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,122 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix88
  • 3 pages without a meta description

    https://www.sunriver.org/about-us, https://www.sunriver.org/volunteer and https://www.sunriver.org/sun-river-health-ambassadors have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 7 pages share a meta description

    https://www.sunriver.org/why-sun-river/leadership and https://www.sunriver.org/foundation/foundation-board-members use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://www.sunriver.org/why-sun-river/leadership and https://www.sunriver.org/foundation/foundation-board-members have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 52 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 5491
  • 9 small tap targets

    9 of 28 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Mixed content”).

2 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix75
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 539 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 539 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 10 calls to action

    The homepage has 10 calls to action, for example “Start a fundraiser”, “Request a Prescription” and “Get started”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Hotjar.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 5 trackers load before any consent

    5

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 15 cookies set on arrival

    15

    Opening the homepage sets 15 cookies, 4 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 35 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 35 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sunriver.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
Vue.js
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Hotjar
Hosting
WP Engine

Company

Employees
1,714

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 41 issues on sunriver.org, including 23 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25