Website review, no card needed
sunways-tech.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 18 October 202635 issues · 81 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on sunways-tech.com, 16 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
76CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 2, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 4.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 4.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 4.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 4.8 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 4.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 5.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 2, 2026 | 146 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 144 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 142 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 114 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 127 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.6 s
1.2 s
1.9 s
2.5 s
3.1 s
3.7 s
4.3 s
4.9 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.0 s · 3.2 MB101 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (3.2 MB).
Render-blocking requests
3.1 s44 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.1 s.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 81). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 419 KiBAbout 419 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
550 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 550 ms).
Google CDN adds 428 ms
428 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 428 ms of main-thread work and 733 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
415 KiB4 images could be 415 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 62 KiBAbout 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.8 s
A phone's processor spends 2.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
1,526 HTML elements
The page has 1,526 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google CDN, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Google Fonts), adding 907 KiB and 484 ms of main-thread time.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 181 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 81 but mobile only 55. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Legacy JavaScript
8 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 8 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 30 ms
30 msYour server sent the HTML in 30 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 6.0 s
6.0 sReal visitors wait 6.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 4.8 s
4.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 3.5 s
3.5 sReal visitors wait 3.5 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 14.6 s
14.6 sYour largest element takes 14.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Sunways Grid-Tied Inverters”.
Time to Interactive: 19.9 s
19.9 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 8.4 s
8.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 8.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.0 s
3.0 sThe first text or image appears after 3.0 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 50% slower for real visitors
+50%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 5.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.11
0.11The layout shifts by 0.11 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 206 ms
206 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 206 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
3 checks passed
Real-user INP: 144 ms
144 msReal visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors
-14%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-10, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 146 ms to 127 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 4.7 MB in 120 requests
4.7 MBYour homepage downloads 4.7 MB in 120 requests on a phone: images 2.8 MB (23), scripts 968 KiB (39) and fonts 428 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (182 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (21 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.3 g of CO₂ per visit
1.33 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.33 g of CO₂e: 160.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
26 text elements with low contrast
26 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
5 tap targets too small
5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 22 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
55 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 58 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 55 passed and 3 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
5 links with vague text
5 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
53 internal links, 8 external
The homepage links to 53 pages on sunways-tech.com and 8 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 143 characters
Your meta description is 143 characters: “Sunways, founded in Germany in 1993, provides grid-tied and hybrid solar inverters, energy storage batteries and smart …”.
Title: 50 characters
Your title is a healthy 50 characters: “Sunways Solar Inverters & Energy Storage Solutions”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.sunways-tech.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, ImageObject, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.sunways-tech.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.sunways-tech.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (879 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
3 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 3 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.sunways-tech.com/category/project/residential-projects, whose canonical is https://www.sunways-tech.com/category/residential-projects. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.sunways-tech.com/residential-solar-solutions and https://www.sunways-tech.com/utility-pv-solutions have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
12 pages slow to respond
https://www.sunways-tech.com/sunways-solar-inverter, https://www.sunways-tech.com/residential-solar-solutions, https://www.sunways-tech.com/utility-pv-solutions, https://www.sunways-tech.com/sunways-oem-odm-solution, https://www.sunways-tech.com/category/project/residential-projects and https://www.sunways-tech.com/category/project/ci-projects and 6 others took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 27 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
13 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Every page has a meta description
All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
6 small tap targets
6 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 distorted images
6 images are displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so they look stretched or squashed.
2 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
A 10-field form
Your longest form asks for 10 fields (6 required). Every extra field lowers completion.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 676 words of copy
The homepage carries about 676 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
8 calls to action
The homepage has 8 calls to action, for example “Contact Us →”, “Learn More” and “Contact Our Experts”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 1 email link.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at sunways-tech.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on sunways-tech.com, including 21 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.