Website review, no card needed

suvinil.com.br logo

suvinil.com.br website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202640 issues · 84 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on suvinil.com.br, 17 of them high impact, across 84 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.1 s1.4 sMay 9Oct 241.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.7 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20262.0 s
Jun 27, 20262.0 s
Jul 4, 20261.8 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.7 s
Aug 1, 20261.7 s
Aug 8, 20261.6 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.6 s
Oct 10, 20261.6 s
Oct 17, 20261.6 s
Oct 24, 20261.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
278 ms180 msMay 9Oct 24206 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026267 ms
May 16, 2026239 ms
May 23, 2026221 ms
May 30, 2026206 ms
Jun 6, 2026218 ms
Jun 13, 2026213 ms
Jun 20, 2026215 ms
Jun 27, 2026212 ms
Jul 4, 2026200 ms
Jul 11, 2026205 ms
Jul 18, 2026204 ms
Jul 25, 2026208 ms
Aug 1, 2026204 ms
Aug 8, 2026199 ms
Aug 15, 2026206 ms
Aug 22, 2026205 ms
Aug 29, 2026201 ms
Sep 5, 2026203 ms
Sep 12, 2026192 ms
Sep 19, 2026191 ms
Sep 26, 2026199 ms
Oct 3, 2026199 ms
Oct 10, 2026212 ms
Oct 17, 2026207 ms
Oct 24, 2026206 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of suvinil.com.br (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. suvinil.com.br at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. suvinil.com.br at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. suvinil.com.br at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. suvinil.com.br at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. suvinil.com.br at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. suvinil.com.br at 3.6 s3.6 s
  7. suvinil.com.br at 4.3 s4.3 s
  8. suvinil.com.br at 4.9 s4.9 s

Speed

6 to fix48
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.3 s · 189 KiB

    13 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (189 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 48

    48/100

    Your mobile performance score is 48 (desktop: 36). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 119 KiB

    About 119 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 2.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 1,522 HTML elements

    The page has 1,522 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    100 ms · 175 KiB

    5 images could be 175 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 100 ms faster on a phone.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Optanon, jQuery CDN and maze.co and others), adding 413 KiB and 154 ms of main-thread time.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 22 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 22 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 160 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    20 KiB

    About 20 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 241 ms

    241 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 241 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.56

    0.56

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.56 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 16.2 s

    16.2 s

    Your largest element takes 16.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.3 s

    16.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.5 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.275

    0.275

    The layout shifts by 0.275 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.1 s

    3.1 s

    Real visitors wait 3.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 303 ms

    303 ms

    Real visitors wait 303 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 11 images without width and height

    11 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -9%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.5 s

    1.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 613 ms

    613 ms

    Real visitors wait 613 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% faster for real visitors

    -18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 267 ms to 206 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 168 ms

    168 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 168 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix85
  • Page weight: 3.0 MB in 113 requests

    3.0 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.0 MB in 113 requests on a phone: other files 1.3 MB (23), images 810 KiB (37) and scripts 776 KiB (47). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (72 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.85 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.85 g of CO₂e: 102.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7388
  • 9 buttons without a name

    9 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 17 text elements with low contrast

    17 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 2 images without alt text

    2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (17 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 17 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 2 form fields without a label

    2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

1 checks passed
  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 52 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 8 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9293
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (FAQPage, Organization and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 84 internal links, 122 external

    The homepage links to 84 pages on suvinil.com.br and 122 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 134 characters

    Your meta description is 134 characters: “No catálogo da Suvinil, você encontra tintas para pintar qualquer tipo de história. Conheça nossas tintas e escolha seu…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Tintas”.

  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Tintas da Suvinil: conheça nosso portfólio!”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.suvinil.com.br/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.suvinil.com.br/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://suvinil.com.br/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,126 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix70
  • 1 linked page is broken

    Your homepage links to https://suvinil.com.br/fale-conosco, which answers with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop it.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    https://suvinil.com.br/guia-de-cores, https://suvinil.com.br/cor-do-ano-suvinil, https://suvinil.com.br/calculadora-de-tinta and https://suvinil.com.br/comparativo-de-cores have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 13 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 13 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 28 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 distorted image

    1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

7 to fix44
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 4 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 1,748 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 1,748 words of visible text.

1 checks passed
  • 1 short form

    A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

Privacy and tracking

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 12 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 12 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

2 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at suvinil.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
Azure

Company

Founded
1961

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on suvinil.com.br, including 16 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 7 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25