Website review, no card needed

systemsaccountants.com logo

systemsaccountants.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202627 issues · 69 checks

This review found 27 issues worth fixing on systemsaccountants.com, 9 of them high impact, across 69 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.5 s1.2 sMay 2Oct 171.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.1 s
May 9, 20263.3 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.7 s
Jun 6, 20262.4 s
Jun 13, 20262.5 s
Jun 20, 20262.5 s
Jun 27, 20262.5 s
Jul 4, 20262.4 s
Jul 11, 20262.2 s
Jul 18, 20262.0 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.6 s
Aug 8, 20261.5 s
Aug 15, 20261.5 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.5 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.5 s
Sep 19, 20261.6 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
100 ms67 msMay 2Oct 1790 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202671 ms
May 9, 202671 ms
May 16, 202673 ms
May 23, 202671 ms
May 30, 202672 ms
Jun 6, 202680 ms
Jun 13, 202686 ms
Jun 20, 202690 ms
Jun 27, 202695 ms
Jul 4, 202695 ms
Jul 11, 202696 ms
Jul 18, 202694 ms
Jul 25, 202690 ms
Aug 1, 202686 ms
Aug 8, 202679 ms
Aug 15, 202684 ms
Aug 22, 202683 ms
Aug 29, 202686 ms
Sep 5, 202690 ms
Sep 12, 202688 ms
Sep 19, 202690 ms
Sep 26, 202690 ms
Oct 3, 202690 ms
Oct 10, 202691 ms
Oct 17, 202690 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of systemsaccountants.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. systemsaccountants.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. systemsaccountants.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. systemsaccountants.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. systemsaccountants.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. systemsaccountants.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. systemsaccountants.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. systemsaccountants.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. systemsaccountants.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

6 to fix58
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.4 s · 227 KiB

    About 227 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 58

    58/100

    Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 78). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 254 KiB

    12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (254 KiB).

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, incendium.ai and data-crypt.com and others), adding 641 KiB and 605 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 340 ms

    340 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 340 ms of main-thread work and 337 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 1,631 HTML elements

    The page has 1,631 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 132 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    34 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 34 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Minify JavaScript

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 833 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 324 ms

    324 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 324 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

8 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.3 s

    7.3 s

    Your largest element takes 7.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “The Akashi Kaikyo bridge at sunset”.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s

    3.8 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors

    +27%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 71 ms to 90 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Real-user TTFB: 956 ms

    956 ms

    Real visitors wait 956 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.158

    0.158

    The layout shifts by 0.158 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 4.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 42% faster for real visitors

    -42%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Total Blocking Time: 161 ms

    161 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 161 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.31 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.31 g of CO₂e: 37.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.1 MB in 67 requests

    1.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.1 MB in 67 requests on a phone: scripts 704 KiB (21), HTML 223 KiB (1) and images 101 KiB (8). That is a lean page.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9173
  • <html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)

    <html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 6 images without alt text

    6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

1 checks passed
  • 8 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 11 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 8 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Title is long (68 characters)

    Your title is 68 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “SystemsAccountants - NetSuite, Unit4, EPM, ERP & Finance Recruitment”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 151 internal links, 2 external

    The homepage links to 151 pages on systemsaccountants.com and 2 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 159 characters

    Your meta description is 159 characters: “We are Finance Systems & Business Technology Recruitment specialists. Find expert talent & project resourcing in Financ…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Bridging the Talent Gap Between Finance & Technology”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.systemsaccountants.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.systemsaccountants.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://www.systemsaccountants.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

1 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

Other pages

1 to fix75
  • 14 linked pages are broken

    Your homepage links to https://www.systemsaccountants.com/fr, https://www.systemsaccountants.com/de, https://www.systemsaccountants.com/jobseekers/send-cv, https://www.systemsaccountants.com/about-us, https://www.systemsaccountants.com/our-brands and https://www.systemsaccountants.com/our-leadership-team and 8 others, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 67 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10092
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 503 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix71
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 47 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • Only about 5 words

    The homepage has only about 5 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

4 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Join”, “Contact” and “Join us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 1 other company contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at systemsaccountants.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2023.

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 27 issues on systemsaccountants.com, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25