Website review, no card needed
systemsaccountants.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202627 issues · 69 checks
This review found 27 issues worth fixing on systemsaccountants.com, 9 of them high impact, across 69 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 71 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 71 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 73 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 71 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 72 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 80 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 94 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 79 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 84 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 83 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 86 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 88 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 90 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 91 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 90 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.4 s · 227 KiBAbout 227 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.4 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 58
58/100Your mobile performance score is 58 (desktop: 78). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
600 ms · 254 KiB12 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (254 KiB).
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, incendium.ai and data-crypt.com and others), adding 641 KiB and 605 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 340 ms
340 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 340 ms of main-thread work and 337 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
1,631 HTML elements
The page has 1,631 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 132 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
34 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 34 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify JavaScript
8 KiB8 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.5 s
A phone's processor spends 1.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 833 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 324 ms
324 msYour server sent the HTML in 324 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.3 s
7.3 sYour largest element takes 7.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “The Akashi Kaikyo bridge at sunset”.
First Contentful Paint: 3.8 s
3.8 sThe first text or image appears after 3.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 9.3 s
9.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 27% slower for real visitors
+27%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 71 ms to 90 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user TTFB: 956 ms
956 msReal visitors wait 956 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.158
0.158The layout shifts by 0.158 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Speed Index: 4.1 s
4.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
5 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.1 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) got 42% faster for real visitors
-42%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.1 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Total Blocking Time: 161 ms
161 msScripts block the page for only 161 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
About 0.3 g of CO₂ per visit
0.31 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.31 g of CO₂e: 37.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Page weight: 1.1 MB in 67 requests
1.1 MBYour homepage downloads 1.1 MB in 67 requests on a phone: scripts 704 KiB (21), HTML 223 KiB (1) and images 101 KiB (8). That is a lean page.
Accessibility
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
6 images without alt text
6 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
1 checks passed
8 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 11 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 8 passed and 3 failed. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (68 characters)
Your title is 68 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “SystemsAccountants - NetSuite, Unit4, EPM, ERP & Finance Recruitment”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
151 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 151 pages on systemsaccountants.com and 2 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 159 characters
Your meta description is 159 characters: “We are Finance Systems & Business Technology Recruitment specialists. Find expert talent & project resourcing in Financ…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Bridging the Talent Gap Between Finance & Technology”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.systemsaccountants.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, WebPage and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.systemsaccountants.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.systemsaccountants.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers
robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
14 linked pages are broken
Your homepage links to https://www.systemsaccountants.com/fr, https://www.systemsaccountants.com/de, https://www.systemsaccountants.com/jobseekers/send-cv, https://www.systemsaccountants.com/about-us, https://www.systemsaccountants.com/our-brands and https://www.systemsaccountants.com/our-leadership-team and 8 others, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 67 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 1 page that loaded have a meta description.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 1 page that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 JavaScript errors while loading
2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 503 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 47 testimonial or review blocks. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
Only about 5 words
The homepage has only about 5 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
6 calls to action
The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Join”, “Contact” and “Join us”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Cloudflare Web Analytics.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 0 email links.
Privacy and tracking
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
1 other company contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 1 host run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at systemsaccountants.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2023.
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- Tailwind CSS
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 27 issues on systemsaccountants.com, including 14 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.