Website review, no card needed

taprootfoundation.org logo

taprootfoundation.org website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202644 issues · 83 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on taprootfoundation.org, 14 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.0 s1.6 sMay 9Oct 241.9 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.0 s
May 16, 20261.9 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20261.9 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20261.9 s
Jul 11, 20261.9 s
Jul 18, 20261.9 s
Jul 25, 20261.9 s
Aug 1, 20261.9 s
Aug 8, 20261.9 s
Aug 15, 20261.8 s
Aug 22, 20261.8 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.6 s
Sep 12, 20261.7 s
Sep 19, 20261.7 s
Sep 26, 20261.9 s
Oct 3, 20261.9 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.9 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
273 ms136 msMay 9Oct 24242 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026238 ms
May 16, 2026232 ms
May 23, 2026236 ms
May 30, 2026203 ms
Jun 6, 2026213 ms
Jun 13, 2026228 ms
Jun 20, 2026236 ms
Jun 27, 2026233 ms
Jul 4, 2026237 ms
Jul 11, 2026224 ms
Jul 18, 2026176 ms
Jul 25, 2026160 ms
Aug 1, 2026152 ms
Aug 8, 2026161 ms
Aug 15, 2026170 ms
Aug 22, 2026181 ms
Aug 29, 2026194 ms
Sep 5, 2026198 ms
Sep 12, 2026201 ms
Sep 19, 2026228 ms
Sep 26, 2026245 ms
Oct 3, 2026251 ms
Oct 10, 2026257 ms
Oct 17, 2026256 ms
Oct 24, 2026242 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of taprootfoundation.org (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. taprootfoundation.org at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. taprootfoundation.org at 1.1 s1.1 s
  3. taprootfoundation.org at 1.7 s1.7 s
  4. taprootfoundation.org at 2.3 s2.3 s
  5. taprootfoundation.org at 2.8 s2.8 s
  6. taprootfoundation.org at 3.4 s3.4 s
  7. taprootfoundation.org at 4.0 s4.0 s
  8. taprootfoundation.org at 4.5 s4.5 s

Speed

12 to fix44
  • Improve image delivery

    13.6 s · 7.6 MB

    12 images could be 7.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 13.6 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    6.9 s · 5.8 MB

    36 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (5.8 MB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.4 s · 2.2 MB

    About 2.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 44

    44/100

    Your mobile performance score is 44. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, helply.com and Facebook and others), adding 2.1 MB and 1.0 s of main-thread time.

  • Render-blocking requests

    650 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 650 ms.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 160 KiB

    About 160 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • 17 long tasks on the main thread

    17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 425 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Main-thread work: 3.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 293 ms

    293 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 293 ms of main-thread work and 352 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • helply.com adds 212 ms

    212 ms

    helply.com costs a phone 212 ms of main-thread work and 345 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Vimeo adds 29 ms

    29 ms

    Vimeo costs a phone 29 ms of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    53 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 53 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify CSS

    5 KiB

    5 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 50.7 s

    50.7 s

    Your largest element takes 50.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Two colleagues working together on a tablet at a shared tab…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 61.5 s

    61.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 61.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 14.8 s

    14.8 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 787 ms

    787 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 787 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.3 s

    3.3 s

    Real visitors wait 3.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +6%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 238 ms to 242 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.0 s to 1.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 137 ms

    137 ms

    Real visitors wait 137 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.03

    0.03

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 16.7 MB in 112 requests

    16.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 16.7 MB in 112 requests on a phone: images 12.6 MB (28), scripts 3.7 MB (44) and fonts 167 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 8 images over 500 KB

    8 images weigh 12.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 5 images far larger than shown

    2.3 MB

    5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example cat-retreat-low.width-1280.png at 1,280 px wide, shown at 358 px. Resized copies would save about 2.3 MB.

  • 12 images in older formats

    12 images (12.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 4 images below the first screen load straight away

    4 images further down the page (5.1 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 4.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.73 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.73 g of CO₂e: 567.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 9997
  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (11 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 22 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 45 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 45 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9272
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (7 characters)

    Your title is only 7 characters: “Taproot”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at taprootfoundation.org/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 94 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 94 pages on taprootfoundation.org and 7 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Power what's possible”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://taprootfoundation.org/.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://taprootfoundation.org/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://taprootfoundation.org/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (790 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 15 pages without a meta description

    https://taprootfoundation.org/taproot-plus, https://taprootfoundation.org/nonprofits, https://taprootfoundation.org/volunteers, https://taprootfoundation.org/companies, https://taprootfoundation.org/grantmakers and https://taprootfoundation.org/advance-pro-bono and 9 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 31 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 5888
  • 2 third-party cookies

    2 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 4 JavaScript errors while loading

    4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    5 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

3 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 505 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 505 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 9 calls to action

    The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “Join Us”, “Get Started” and “Subscribe”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo and LinkedIn Insight and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 8 cookies set on arrival

    8

    Opening the homepage sets 8 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 33 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 33 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at taprootfoundation.org, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Render

Company

Headquarters
San Francisco

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on taprootfoundation.org, including 22 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25