Website review, no card needed
tcsg.edu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 2 November 202642 issues · 90 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on tcsg.edu, 16 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
72CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 162 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 163 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 167 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 160 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 156 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 159 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 168 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 175 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 179 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 182 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 177 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 175 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
6.0 s64 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 6.0 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.3 s · 1.0 MBAbout 1.0 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.3 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 38
38/100Your mobile performance score is 38. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, edulla.ai and Facebook and others), adding 2.4 MB and 1.3 s of main-thread time.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
984 KiB20 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (984 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
750 ms · 108 KiBAbout 108 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 658 ms
658 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 658 ms of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
263 KiB10 images could be 263 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
edulla.ai adds 182 ms
182 msedulla.ai costs a phone 182 ms of main-thread work and 327 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Facebook adds 171 ms
171 msFacebook costs a phone 171 ms of main-thread work and 357 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 47 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 47 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 18 KiB18 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
10 long tasks on the main thread
10 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 154 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Minify JavaScript
12 KiB12 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 4 ms
4 msYour server sent the HTML in 4 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 13.4 s
13.4 sYour largest element takes 13.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below.
Time to Interactive: 29.3 s
29.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 29.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.4 s
5.4 sThe first text or image appears after 5.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 9.1 s
9.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 3.6 s
3.6 sReal visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 2.7 s
2.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s
1.3 sReal visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.189
0.189The layout shifts by 0.189 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 418 ms
418 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 418 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+8%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 162 ms to 175 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
2 checks passed
Real-user INP: 144 ms
144 msReal visitors wait 144 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.01
0.01For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.01 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.5 MB in 241 requests
11.5 MBYour homepage downloads 11.5 MB in 241 requests on a phone: media 6.6 MB (1), scripts 2.9 MB (79) and images 1.0 MB (66). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image in older formats
1 image (37 KiB) is JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (37 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit
3.26 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.26 g of CO₂e: 391.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Links must have discernible text (22 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 22 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Frames without titles
3 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.
2 tap targets too small
2 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
5 form fields without a label
5 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h4, h1 → h3 and h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
38 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 38 passed and 9 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
4 H1 headlines
There are 4 <h1> headlines (“22 COLLEGES88 CAMPUSES600+ PROGRAMS”, “Choose your TCSG Experience” and “WHY TCSG?”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
45 internal links, 35 external
The homepage links to 45 pages on tcsg.edu and 35 external pages.
5 checks passed
Title: 42 characters
Your title is a healthy 42 characters: “TCSG | Technical College System of Georgia”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tcsg.edu/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tcsg.edu/wp-sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.tcsg.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 5 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (410 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
10 pages without a meta description
https://www.tcsg.edu/adult-education, https://www.tcsg.edu/worksource, https://www.tcsg.edu/for-students/faces-of-teched, https://www.tcsg.edu/about-tcsg, https://www.tcsg.edu/find-a-college/programs and https://www.tcsg.edu/for-students and 4 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages slow to respond
https://www.tcsg.edu/for-students/faces-of-teched and https://www.tcsg.edu/sei took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
6 checks passed
Linked pages load
10 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 10 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://fonts.gstatic.com/s/i/productlogos/translate/v14/24px.svg.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “The Content-Security-Policy directive 'plugin-types' has been removed from the specification. If you want to block plug…”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
10 of 12 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 342 words of copy
The homepage carries about 342 words of visible text.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “APPLY NOW!” and “I’m a high school student Learn More”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Get Started!”, “Georgia Quick Start” and “Apply Now!”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Pinterest Tag and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
32 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 32 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tcsg.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Hosting
- GoDaddy
Company
- Founded
- 2007
- Headquarters
- Atlanta
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on tcsg.edu, including 22 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.