Website review, no card needed
techbaked.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202634 issues · 70 checks
This review found 34 issues worth fixing on techbaked.com, 8 of them high impact, across 70 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 225 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 250 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 220 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 206 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 186 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 185 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 194 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 198 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 236 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 230 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 233 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 170 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 145 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 115 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
3.4 s · 1.5 MB5 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Mobile performance score: 70
70/100Your mobile performance score is 70 (desktop: 73). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
450 ms · 102 KiBAbout 102 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
350 ms · 37 KiB1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (37 KiB).
4 third-party services on the page
4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, acscdn.com and bauval.org and others), adding 228 KiB and 290 ms of main-thread time.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 139 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 0.7 s
A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 378 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 104 ms
104 msYour server sent the HTML in 104 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.5 s
7.5 sYour largest element takes 7.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Sync Refresh Rates for Smooth Playback in Windows”.
Time to Interactive: 7.5 s
7.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 7.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s
2.2 sThe first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.1 s
2.1 sReal visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 51% faster for real visitors
-51%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 225 ms to 115 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Speed Index: 3.4 s
3.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 3.4 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.
Total Blocking Time: 192 ms
192 msScripts block the page for only 192 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.015
0.015The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.015, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.1 MB in 21 requests
2.1 MBYour homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 21 requests on a phone: images 1.7 MB (6), scripts 276 KiB (10) and fonts 87 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images in older formats
5 images (1.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (622 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.60 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.60 g of CO₂e: 71.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 links without text
3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 11 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
39 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (9 characters)
Your title is only 9 characters: “TechBaked”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is short (59 characters)
Your meta description is only 59 characters: “Technology News, Tutorials, Smartphones and Gadgets Reviews”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
33 internal links, 0 external
The homepage links to 33 pages on techbaked.com and 0 external pages.
4 checks passed
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://techbaked.com/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://techbaked.com/sitemap_index.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://techbaked.com/llms.txt (1 KiB, 11 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
6 linked pages hidden from search
https://techbaked.com/category/news, https://techbaked.com/category/how-to, https://techbaked.com/category/best-picks, https://techbaked.com/category/best-picks/alternatives, https://techbaked.com/category/windows and https://techbaked.com/category/apple are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
3 pages share a title
/, https://techbaked.com/page/2 and https://techbaked.com/page/165 all use the title “TechBaked”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
6 pages without a meta description
https://techbaked.com/category/news, https://techbaked.com/category/how-to, https://techbaked.com/category/best-picks, https://techbaked.com/category/best-picks/alternatives, https://techbaked.com/category/windows and https://techbaked.com/category/apple have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://techbaked.com/page/2 and https://techbaked.com/page/165 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
2 pages without an H1
https://techbaked.com/page/2 and https://techbaked.com/page/165 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
2 pages with very little text
https://techbaked.com/page/2 and https://techbaked.com/page/165 have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
7 small tap targets
7 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 90 words
The homepage has only about 90 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact Us”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
2 cookies set on arrival
2Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
5 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at techbaked.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- CMS
- WordPress
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- Cloudflare
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 34 issues on techbaked.com, including 11 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.