Website review, no card needed

techbaked.com logo

techbaked.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202634 issues · 70 checks

This review found 34 issues worth fixing on techbaked.com, 8 of them high impact, across 70 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.2 s1.6 sMay 9Oct 241.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20261.7 s
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.7 s
May 30, 20261.8 s
Jun 6, 20261.8 s
Jun 13, 20261.8 s
Jun 20, 20261.8 s
Jun 27, 20261.8 s
Jul 4, 20261.7 s
Jul 11, 20261.7 s
Jul 18, 20261.8 s
Jul 25, 20261.8 s
Aug 1, 20261.8 s
Aug 8, 20261.8 s
Aug 15, 20261.7 s
Aug 22, 20261.7 s
Aug 29, 20261.7 s
Sep 5, 20261.8 s
Sep 12, 20261.9 s
Sep 19, 20262.1 s
Sep 26, 20262.0 s
Oct 3, 20262.0 s
Oct 10, 20261.9 s
Oct 17, 20261.8 s
Oct 24, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
271 ms92 msMay 9Oct 24115 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026225 ms
May 16, 2026250 ms
May 23, 2026220 ms
May 30, 2026206 ms
Jun 6, 2026186 ms
Jun 13, 2026185 ms
Jun 20, 2026194 ms
Jun 27, 2026198 ms
Jul 4, 2026208 ms
Jul 11, 2026236 ms
Jul 18, 2026230 ms
Jul 25, 2026230 ms
Aug 1, 2026233 ms
Aug 8, 2026190 ms
Aug 15, 2026170 ms
Aug 22, 2026145 ms
Aug 29, 2026125 ms
Sep 5, 2026136 ms
Sep 12, 2026141 ms
Sep 19, 2026136 ms
Sep 26, 2026116 ms
Oct 3, 2026113 ms
Oct 10, 2026115 ms
Oct 17, 2026116 ms
Oct 24, 2026115 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of techbaked.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. techbaked.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. techbaked.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. techbaked.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. techbaked.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. techbaked.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. techbaked.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. techbaked.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. techbaked.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

5 to fix70
  • Improve image delivery

    3.4 s · 1.5 MB

    5 images could be 1.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.2 s

    2 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 70

    70/100

    Your mobile performance score is 70 (desktop: 73). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    450 ms · 102 KiB

    About 102 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    350 ms · 37 KiB

    1 file is served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (37 KiB).

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, acscdn.com and bauval.org and others), adding 228 KiB and 290 ms of main-thread time.

  • 3 long tasks on the main thread

    3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 139 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 0.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 378 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 104 ms

    104 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 104 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

6 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    Your largest element takes 7.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Sync Refresh Rates for Smooth Playback in Windows”.

  • Time to Interactive: 7.5 s

    7.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 7.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.2 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

6 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 2.1 s

    2.1 s

    Real visitors wait 2.1 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 51% faster for real visitors

    -51%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 225 ms to 115 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Speed Index: 3.4 s

    3.4 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 3.4 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 192 ms

    192 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 192 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.015

    0.015

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.015, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

3 to fix68
  • Page weight: 2.1 MB in 21 requests

    2.1 MB

    Your homepage downloads 2.1 MB in 21 requests on a phone: images 1.7 MB (6), scripts 276 KiB (10) and fonts 87 KiB (2). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 5 images in older formats

    5 images (1.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (622 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.60 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.60 g of CO₂e: 71.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

3 to fixGoogle 10097
  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 11 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 39 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 39 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10075
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (9 characters)

    Your title is only 9 characters: “TechBaked”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • Meta description is short (59 characters)

    Your meta description is only 59 characters: “Technology News, Tutorials, Smartphones and Gadgets Reviews”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 33 internal links, 0 external

    The homepage links to 33 pages on techbaked.com and 0 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://techbaked.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, CollectionPage, Organization and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://techbaked.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix83
  • Organization data is thin (3 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://techbaked.com/llms.txt (1 KiB, 11 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

5 to fix74
  • 6 linked pages hidden from search

    https://techbaked.com/category/news, https://techbaked.com/category/how-to, https://techbaked.com/category/best-picks, https://techbaked.com/category/best-picks/alternatives, https://techbaked.com/category/windows and https://techbaked.com/category/apple are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.

  • 3 pages share a title

    /, https://techbaked.com/page/2 and https://techbaked.com/page/165 all use the title “TechBaked”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 6 pages without a meta description

    https://techbaked.com/category/news, https://techbaked.com/category/how-to, https://techbaked.com/category/best-picks, https://techbaked.com/category/best-picks/alternatives, https://techbaked.com/category/windows and https://techbaked.com/category/apple have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://techbaked.com/page/2 and https://techbaked.com/page/165 use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 2 pages without an H1

    https://techbaked.com/page/2 and https://techbaked.com/page/165 have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 2 pages with very little text

    https://techbaked.com/page/2 and https://techbaked.com/page/165 have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 20 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

3 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 7 small tap targets

    7 of 16 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 403 ()”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix57
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 90 words

    The homepage has only about 90 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

3 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 5 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 5 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at techbaked.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 34 issues on techbaked.com, including 11 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25