Website review, no card needed

technicum-engineering.nl logo

technicum-engineering.nl website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 31 October 202625 issues · 65 checks

This review found 25 issues worth fixing on technicum-engineering.nl, 4 of them high impact, across 65 checks. The most urgent: no call to action on the first screen. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Full-page screenshot of technicum-engineering.nl (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. technicum-engineering.nl at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. technicum-engineering.nl at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. technicum-engineering.nl at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. technicum-engineering.nl at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. technicum-engineering.nl at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. technicum-engineering.nl at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. technicum-engineering.nl at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. technicum-engineering.nl at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

4 to fix64
  • Mobile performance score: 64

    64/100

    Your mobile performance score is 64. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 163 KiB

    About 163 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Clarity and JSDelivr CDN and others), adding 719 KiB and 607 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 475 ms

    475 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 475 ms of main-thread work and 389 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Render-blocking requests

    250 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 250 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    215 KiB

    4 images could be 215 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 5 long tasks on the main thread

    5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 214 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    150 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 150 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    18 KiB

    About 18 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    13 KiB

    2 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (13 KiB).

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 1.3 s

    A phone's processor spends 1.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 874 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 102 ms

    102 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 102 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

5 to fix59
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 5.5 s

    5.5 s

    Your largest element takes 5.5 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Engineers collaborating on a challenge”.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.8 s

    8.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 341 ms

    341 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 341 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.117

    0.117

    The layout shifts by 0.117 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Not enough real-visitor data yet

    Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.

1 checks passed
  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

2 to fix86
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    technicum-engineering-teamwork-empower.webp is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • 1 image far larger than shown

    49 KiB

    1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example technicum-engineering-teamwork-empower.webp at 1,680 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 49 KiB.

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.36 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.36 g of CO₂e: 43.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.3 MB in 48 requests

    1.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 48 requests on a phone: scripts 539 KiB (18), images 405 KiB (9) and fonts 286 KiB (6). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

Accessibility

1 to fixGoogle 10099
  • 4 form fields without a label

    4 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 10 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 48 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 0 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10082
  • Title is short (28 characters)

    Your title is only 28 characters: “Voor technisch professionals”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://usgengineering.nl/sitemap-index.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • 109 internal links, 6 external

    The homepage links to 109 pages on technicum-engineering.nl and 6 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Meta description: 147 characters

    Your meta description is 147 characters: “Op zoek naar een hogere functie in de techniek? Bekijk alle HBO en WO vacatures bij Technicum Engineering of meld je aa…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Welkom bij Technicum Engineering”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://technicum-engineering.nl/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (674 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

3 to fix83
  • 2 pages share a title

    /ik-zoek-werk/vacatures/per-provincie and /ik-zoek-werk/vacatures/per-provincie/meer-provincies all use the title “Per provincie”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 4 pages without a meta description

    /professionals, /opdrachtgevers, /ik-zoek-werk/vacatures/per-provincie and /ik-zoek-werk/vacatures/per-provincie/meer-provincies have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example /ik-zoek-werk/vacatures/per-provincie/meer-provincies, whose canonical is /ik-zoek-werk/vacatures/per-provincie. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 56 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

4 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 5 small tap targets

    5 of 9 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Refused to execute script from 'https://technicum-engineering.nl/Frontend-Assembly/Telerik.Sitefinity.Frontend/Mvc/Scri…”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix67
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 432 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 432 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 4 calls to action

    The homepage has 4 calls to action, for example “Contact” and “Liever rechtstreeks contact?”.

  • 3 short forms

    3 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 3 cookies set on arrival

    3

    Opening the homepage sets 3 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 11 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 11 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at technicum-engineering.nl, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
Sitefinity 15.3.8532.0 DX
Framework
Tailwind CSS
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 25 issues on technicum-engineering.nl, including 9 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25