Website review, no card needed

technologyreview.com logo

technologyreview.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202644 issues · 90 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on technologyreview.com, 19 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: main-thread work: 31.1 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.2 sMay 16Oct 312.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.6 s
May 23, 20262.8 s
May 30, 20262.8 s
Jun 6, 20262.8 s
Jun 13, 20262.8 s
Jun 20, 20262.7 s
Jun 27, 20262.7 s
Jul 4, 20262.7 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.7 s
Jul 25, 20262.8 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.9 s
Aug 15, 20262.9 s
Aug 22, 20262.8 s
Aug 29, 20262.9 s
Sep 5, 20262.8 s
Sep 12, 20262.8 s
Sep 19, 20262.7 s
Sep 26, 20262.7 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.5 s
Oct 17, 20262.3 s
Oct 24, 20262.3 s
Oct 31, 20262.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
202 ms158 msMay 16Oct 31193 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026163 ms
May 23, 2026165 ms
May 30, 2026165 ms
Jun 6, 2026167 ms
Jun 13, 2026169 ms
Jun 20, 2026171 ms
Jun 27, 2026176 ms
Jul 4, 2026178 ms
Jul 11, 2026181 ms
Jul 18, 2026189 ms
Jul 25, 2026189 ms
Aug 1, 2026188 ms
Aug 8, 2026190 ms
Aug 15, 2026186 ms
Aug 22, 2026188 ms
Aug 29, 2026191 ms
Sep 5, 2026191 ms
Sep 12, 2026190 ms
Sep 19, 2026191 ms
Sep 26, 2026195 ms
Oct 3, 2026197 ms
Oct 10, 2026196 ms
Oct 17, 2026196 ms
Oct 24, 2026194 ms
Oct 31, 2026193 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of technologyreview.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. technologyreview.com at 2.9 s2.9 s
  2. technologyreview.com at 5.9 s5.9 s
  3. technologyreview.com at 8.8 s8.8 s
  4. technologyreview.com at 11.8 s11.8 s
  5. technologyreview.com at 14.7 s14.7 s
  6. technologyreview.com at 17.6 s17.6 s
  7. technologyreview.com at 20.6 s20.6 s
  8. technologyreview.com at 23.5 s23.5 s

Speed

15 to fix27
  • Main-thread work: 31.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 31.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 19.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Cloudflare CDN adds 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Cloudflare CDN costs a phone 3.0 s of main-thread work and 500 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 2.8 s of main-thread work and 738 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Google/Doubleclick Ads adds 2.0 s

    2.0 s

    Google/Doubleclick Ads costs a phone 2.0 s of main-thread work and 841 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.0 s · 447 KiB

    7 images could be 447 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 27

    27/100

    Your mobile performance score is 27. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Cloudflare CDN, Google Tag Manager and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 2.6 MB and 10.2 s of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    600 ms · 1.6 MB

    62 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.6 MB).

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.9 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • reddit adds 952 ms

    952 ms

    reddit costs a phone 952 ms of main-thread work and 47 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Facebook adds 711 ms

    711 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 711 ms of main-thread work and 255 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Font display

    550 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 550 ms).

  • 2,660 HTML elements

    The page has 2,660 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    260 KiB

    About 260 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    40 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 40 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 32 ms

    32 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 32 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.55

    0.55

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.55 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Speed Index: 31.0 s

    31.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 31.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 12.8 s

    12.8 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 12.8 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Time to Interactive: 40.4 s

    40.4 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 40.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.483

    0.483

    The layout shifts by 0.483 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 215 ms

    215 ms

    Real visitors wait 215 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Real visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 3.9 s

    3.9 s

    Your largest element takes 3.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Illustration of two robots arms pulling identically sliced …”.

  • Tap response (INP) got 18% slower for real visitors

    +18%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 163 ms to 193 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user FCP: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors

    -16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.6 s to 2.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.6 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 5.6 MB in 293 requests

    5.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 5.6 MB in 293 requests on a phone: scripts 3.8 MB (120), images 807 KiB (29) and fonts 364 KiB (14). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image below the first screen load straight away

    1 image further down the page (57 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 1.6 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.58 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.58 g of CO₂e: 189.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8494
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • Frames without titles

    3 frames have no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what they contain.

  • ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name (2 elements)

    ARIA dialog and alertdialog nodes should have an accessible name: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • 75 links without text

    75 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 6 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 50 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 55 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 5 failed. 5 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

2 to fixGoogle 9290
  • Title is short (21 characters)

    Your title is only 21 characters: “MIT Technology Review”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 255 internal links, 49 external

    The homepage links to 255 pages on technologyreview.com and 49 external pages.

7 checks passed
  • Meta description: 75 characters

    Your meta description is 75 characters: “Emerging technology news & insights | AI, Climate Change, BioTech, and more”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “MIT Technology Review”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.technologyreview.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Organization.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.technologyreview.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 3 AI answer engine crawlers

    3 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • Organization data is thin (1 of 6 facts)

    Your Organization JSON-LD is missing url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no /llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (7,284 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 4 pages without a meta description

    /tag/the-big-story, /topic/artificial-intelligence, /topic/biotechnology and /topic/climate-change have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 4 pages without an H1

    /tag/the-big-story, /topic/artificial-intelligence, /topic/biotechnology and /topic/climate-change have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 101 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7770
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=16002556&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=186db7f8-d4de-42ca-9c41-d98f9661e332&bo=1&sid=c3e9c230d7e211f1a90e071769a8276f&vid=c3e9eb40d7e211f19bf99ff0f5929c6f&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=91.

  • 14 small tap targets

    14 of 30 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix69
  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 7,405 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 7,405 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “SUBSCRIBE”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “sign up here”, “Sign up for free” and “Contact us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

Privacy and tracking

  • 11 trackers load before any consent

    11

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Amazon Ads, Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Hotjar and 6 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 38 cookies set on arrival

    38

    Opening the homepage sets 38 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 48 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 48 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at technologyreview.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Analytics
Google Tag Manager

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on technologyreview.com, including 25 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25