Website review, no card needed

techversantinfotech.com logo

techversantinfotech.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 1 November 202635 issues · 87 checks

This review found 35 issues worth fixing on techversantinfotech.com, 13 of them high impact, across 87 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 21.5 MB in 125 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
4.0 s1.6 sMay 9Oct 241.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20263.7 s
May 16, 20263.6 s
May 23, 20263.4 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.3 s
Jun 13, 20263.4 s
Jun 20, 20263.5 s
Jun 27, 20263.3 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.6 s
Jul 18, 20262.5 s
Jul 25, 20262.5 s
Aug 1, 20262.7 s
Aug 8, 20262.7 s
Aug 15, 20262.6 s
Aug 22, 20262.5 s
Aug 29, 20262.5 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.6 s
Sep 26, 20262.8 s
Oct 3, 20262.7 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.2 s
Oct 24, 20261.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
138 ms94 msMay 9Oct 24104 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026125 ms
May 16, 2026117 ms
May 23, 2026120 ms
May 30, 2026123 ms
Jun 6, 2026129 ms
Jun 13, 2026131 ms
Jun 20, 2026133 ms
Jun 27, 2026132 ms
Jul 4, 2026127 ms
Jul 11, 2026129 ms
Jul 18, 2026125 ms
Jul 25, 2026123 ms
Aug 1, 2026123 ms
Aug 8, 2026122 ms
Aug 15, 2026122 ms
Aug 22, 2026119 ms
Aug 29, 2026117 ms
Sep 5, 2026117 ms
Sep 12, 2026116 ms
Sep 19, 2026116 ms
Sep 26, 2026117 ms
Oct 3, 2026110 ms
Oct 10, 202699 ms
Oct 17, 2026104 ms
Oct 24, 2026104 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of techversantinfotech.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. techversantinfotech.com at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. techversantinfotech.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  3. techversantinfotech.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  4. techversantinfotech.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  5. techversantinfotech.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  6. techversantinfotech.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  7. techversantinfotech.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  8. techversantinfotech.com at 5.1 s5.1 s

Speed

10 to fix61
  • Render-blocking requests

    2.0 s

    32 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    10.4 MB

    4 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (10.4 MB).

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Cloudflare, Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager and others), adding 16.5 MB and 10 ms of main-thread time.

  • Amazon Web Services adds 0 ms

    0 ms

    Amazon Web Services costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 16.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 61

    61/100

    Your mobile performance score is 61. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    750 ms · 135 KiB

    About 135 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 750 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    450 ms · 79 KiB

    About 79 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.

  • Main-thread work: 3.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 818 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 316 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • 1,812 HTML elements

    The page has 1,812 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    174 KiB

    8 images could be 174 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    10 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 10 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 205 ms

    205 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 205 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Real visitors wait 4.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.64

    0.64

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.64 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 3.5 s

    3.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 3.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 3.0 s

    3.0 s

    Real visitors wait 3.0 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.7 s

    8.7 s

    Your largest element takes 8.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (4.8 s).

  • Speed Index: 8.0 s

    8.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 8.8 s

    8.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 8.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 26 images without width and height

    26 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

5 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 168 ms

    168 ms

    Real visitors wait 168 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 14% faster for real visitors

    -14%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 125 ms to 104 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 44% faster for real visitors

    -44%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.7 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.077

    0.077

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.077, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 133 ms

    133 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 133 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

1 to fix70
  • Page weight: 21.5 MB in 125 requests

    21.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 21.5 MB in 125 requests on a phone: media 19.7 MB (2), images 665 KiB (13) and scripts 593 KiB (56). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • About 6.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    6.09 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 6.09 g of CO₂e: 731.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 9294
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (29 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 29 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 12 links without text

    12 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 36 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9285
  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 7 links with vague text

    7 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • 189 internal links, 4 external

    The homepage links to 189 pages on techversantinfotech.com and 4 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 145 characters

    Your meta description is 145 characters: “Techversant is an AI Solutions Company delivering software development, IT consulting, cybersecurity, cloud, and digita…”.

  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “AI Solutions Company | Techversant Infotech”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://techversantinfotech.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Article, ImageObject, Organization, Person and Place.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://techversantinfotech.com/sitemap_index.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://techversantinfotech.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 5 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, Google-Extended, Applebot-Extended and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers, which the crawlers above handle.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 5 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, description and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (925 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 4 pages slow to respond

    https://techversantinfotech.com/industries/financial-services-fintech, https://techversantinfotech.com/industries/hr-workforce-management, https://techversantinfotech.com/industries/media-publishing and https://techversantinfotech.com/industries/travel-tourism took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 48 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

7 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 8893
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • 1 low-resolution image

    1 image is served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Content security policy”).

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    18 of 19 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix69
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No phone number on the homepage

    A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 711 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 711 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Contact Us”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (5 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 52 testimonial or review blocks and 1 trust badge.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics and Cloudflare Web Analytics.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 1 tracker load before any consent

    1

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 6 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 6 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at techversantinfotech.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
Cloudflare

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 35 issues on techversantinfotech.com, including 20 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25