Website review, no card needed
teka.com.br website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 3 November 202644 issues · 77 checks
This review found 44 issues worth fixing on teka.com.br, 15 of them high impact, across 77 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
64DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 3.4 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 3.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 330 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 303 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 284 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 281 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 292 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 303 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 337 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 348 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 355 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 354 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 363 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 389 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 405 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 413 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 400 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 373 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 337 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 315 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 303 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 298 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 295 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 285 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 280 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.5 s
2.0 s
2.5 s
3.1 s
3.6 s
4.1 s
Speed
Render-blocking requests
2.0 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.0 s.
Mobile performance score: 41
41/100Your mobile performance score is 41. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.6 s
A phone's processor spends 4.6 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (vtexassets.com, Google Tag Manager and Google CDN and others), adding 10.3 MB and 2.2 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 1.4 MBAbout 1.4 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
vtexassets.com adds 818 ms
818 msvtexassets.com costs a phone 818 ms of main-thread work and 7.3 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce initial server response time
959 msReduce initial server response time. Google estimates savings of 959 ms on a phone.
Document request latency
950 msThe HTML itself could arrive about 950 ms sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Reduce unused CSS
600 ms · 110 KiBAbout 110 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 560 ms
560 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 560 ms of main-thread work and 541 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Google CDN adds 360 ms
360 msGoogle CDN costs a phone 360 ms of main-thread work and 2.0 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
384 KiB48 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (384 KiB).
1,509 HTML elements
The page has 1,509 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Server response: 1.1 s
1.1 sYour server takes 1.1 s to send the HTML. Google recommends under 600 ms; everything else waits for it.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 246 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
71 KiB4 images could be 71 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
13 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 20.5 s
20.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 20.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 7.7 s
7.7 sYour largest element takes 7.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 9.9 s
9.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.9 s
3.9 sThe first text or image appears after 3.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 735 ms
735 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 735 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user LCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors wait 2.5 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 286 ms
286 msReal visitors wait 286 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.5 s
2.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 1.1 s
1.1 sReal visitors wait 1.1 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
6 images without width and height
6 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-4%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.5 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 330 ms to 280 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.007
0.007The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.007, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.5 MB in 164 requests
3.5 MBYour homepage downloads 3.5 MB in 164 requests on a phone: scripts 2.1 MB (58), other files 391 KiB (37) and fonts 391 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 1.0 g of CO₂ per visit
0.98 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.98 g of CO₂e: 117.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
4 buttons without a name
4 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
19 links without text
19 links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
6 tap targets too small
6 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
1 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 37 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (ItemList and WebSite) but with 1 problem, for example “WebSite: missing name”.
Open Graph partly set
Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
45 internal links, 12 external
The homepage links to 45 pages on teka.com.br and 12 external pages.
4 checks passed
Title: 56 characters
Your title is a healthy 56 characters: “Teka Oficial | Produtos de Cama, mesa, banho e hotelaria”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.teka.com.br/.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.teka.com.br/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://www.teka.com.br/toalha-de-banho-100--algodao-lumiere-823010000082300/p has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.teka.com.br/153 is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
5 pages without a meta description
https://www.teka.com.br/black-friday-teka, https://www.teka.com.br/kits-anfitrioes, https://www.teka.com.br/toalha-de-banho-100--algodao-lumiere-823010000082300/p, https://www.teka.com.br/153 and https://www.teka.com.br/linha-hotelaria have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages without an H1
https://www.teka.com.br/toalha-de-banho-100--algodao-lumiere-823010000082300/p and https://www.teka.com.br/linha-hotelaria have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
4 pages slow to respond
https://www.teka.com.br/black-friday-teka, https://www.teka.com.br/banho, https://www.teka.com.br/infantil and https://www.teka.com.br/hotelaria-banho took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 19 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
2 console errors
2 errors were logged to the browser console during Google's test (“Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”).
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
4 low-resolution images
4 images are served at too low a resolution for sharp phone screens.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 337 words of copy
The homepage carries about 337 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage, asking for an email.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at teka.com.br, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- React
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- CloudFront
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 44 issues on teka.com.br, including 25 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.