Website review, no card needed

the-ken.com logo

the-ken.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 20 October 202655 issues · 94 checks

This review found 55 issues worth fixing on the-ken.com, 21 of them high impact, across 94 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.7 s2.9 sMay 2Oct 173.3 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.2 s
May 9, 20263.2 s
May 16, 20263.1 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20263.0 s
Jun 6, 20263.1 s
Jun 13, 20263.1 s
Jun 20, 20263.1 s
Jun 27, 20263.2 s
Jul 4, 20263.2 s
Jul 11, 20263.2 s
Jul 18, 20263.3 s
Jul 25, 20263.2 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.4 s
Aug 15, 20263.4 s
Aug 22, 20263.5 s
Aug 29, 20263.5 s
Sep 5, 20263.5 s
Sep 12, 20263.5 s
Sep 19, 20263.5 s
Sep 26, 20263.6 s
Oct 3, 20263.4 s
Oct 10, 20263.3 s
Oct 17, 20263.3 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
167 ms105 msMay 2Oct 17140 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026130 ms
May 9, 2026128 ms
May 16, 2026127 ms
May 23, 2026118 ms
May 30, 2026116 ms
Jun 6, 2026116 ms
Jun 13, 2026112 ms
Jun 20, 2026114 ms
Jun 27, 2026117 ms
Jul 4, 2026122 ms
Jul 11, 2026134 ms
Jul 18, 2026139 ms
Jul 25, 2026136 ms
Aug 1, 2026128 ms
Aug 8, 2026126 ms
Aug 15, 2026126 ms
Aug 22, 2026141 ms
Aug 29, 2026146 ms
Sep 5, 2026152 ms
Sep 12, 2026158 ms
Sep 19, 2026158 ms
Sep 26, 2026160 ms
Oct 3, 2026156 ms
Oct 10, 2026145 ms
Oct 17, 2026140 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of the-ken.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. the-ken.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  2. the-ken.com at 2.2 s2.2 s
  3. the-ken.com at 3.4 s3.4 s
  4. the-ken.com at 4.5 s4.5 s
  5. the-ken.com at 5.6 s5.6 s
  6. the-ken.com at 6.7 s6.7 s
  7. the-ken.com at 7.8 s7.8 s
  8. the-ken.com at 8.9 s8.9 s

Speed

10 to fix38
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.3 s

    19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.

  • Mobile performance score: 38

    38/100

    Your mobile performance score is 38 (desktop: 66). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.1 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    2.2 MB

    21 images could be 2.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    600 ms · 303 KiB

    About 303 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • 4 third-party services on the page

    4 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel and Google Analytics and others), adding 557 KiB and 719 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 634 ms

    634 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 634 ms of main-thread work and 471 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Minify JavaScript

    450 ms · 113 KiB

    113 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • 2,849 HTML elements

    The page has 2,849 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • 9 long tasks on the main thread

    9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 264 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Font display

    250 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).

  • Reduce unused CSS

    150 ms · 42 KiB

    About 42 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    47 KiB

    3 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (47 KiB).

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 66 but mobile only 38. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Minify CSS

    8 KiB

    8 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 531 ms

    531 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 531 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 22.4 s

    22.4 s

    Your largest element takes 22.4 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Image of the article”.

  • Time to Interactive: 25.9 s

    25.9 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 25.9 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s

    4.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 7.6 s

    7.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 7.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 618 ms

    618 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 618 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.7 s

    3.7 s

    Real visitors wait 3.7 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.18

    0.18

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.18 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.7 s

    2.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.6 s

    1.6 s

    Real visitors wait 1.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.152

    0.152

    The layout shifts by 0.152 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • 4 images without width and height

    4 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 130 ms to 140 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +4%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.2 s to 3.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 134 ms

    134 ms

    Real visitors wait 134 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 9.7 MB in 149 requests

    9.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 9.7 MB in 149 requests on a phone: images 7.9 MB (95), scripts 863 KiB (23) and fonts 675 KiB (10). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 20 images far larger than shown

    1.8 MB

    20 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example marc-olivier-jodoin-tquerqguz8-unsplash.jpg at 1,367 px wide, shown at 350 px. Resized copies would save about 1.8 MB.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    marc-olivier-jodoin-tquerqguz8-unsplash.jpg weighs 613 KiB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 27 images in older formats

    27 images (4.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 25 images below the first screen load straight away

    25 images further down the page (4.3 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.7 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.74 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.74 g of CO₂e: 328.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

12 to fixGoogle 7183
  • 2 buttons without a name

    2 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 80 text elements with low contrast

    80 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 4 tap targets too small

    4 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • Scrollable region must have keyboard access (2 elements)

    Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • 8 images without alt text

    8 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (206 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 206 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)

    Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 15 form fields without a label

    15 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings should not be empty (14 elements)

    Headings should not be empty: 14 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h4, h2 → h5 and h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 42 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 42 passed and 12 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 7780
  • Title is long (71 characters)

    Your title is 71 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “The Ken - Business, Startups, Technology and Healthcare news from India”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 4 H1 headlines

    There are 4 <h1> headlines (“Family offices love to hate venture capitalists”, “Sign up for your free account” and “Welcome”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • 21 links crawlers can't follow

    21 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 395 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 395 pages on the-ken.com and 12 external pages.

5 checks passed
  • Meta description: 133 characters

    Your meta description is 133 characters: “The Ken - Unrivaled analysis and powerful stories about businesses from across the globe brought to you by award-winnin…”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://the-ken.com/.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://the-ken.com/post-sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

2 to fix53
  • robots.txt blocks 3 AI answer engine crawlers

    3 of 6

    Your robots.txt shuts out ChatGPT search (OAI-SearchBot), ChatGPT (ChatGPT-User) and Perplexity (PerplexityBot). These fetch pages to answer people's questions and cite the source, so your site can't be quoted or linked in those answers.

  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://the-ken.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

  • Opted out of AI training for 3 crawlers

    robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot and CCBot, which collect pages to train models. That's a legitimate choice and doesn't by itself stop the site appearing in AI answers.

1 checks passed
  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (3,893 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 8 pages share 4 titles

    https://the-ken.com/newsletters/make-india-competitive-again and https://the-ken.com/podcasts/make-india-competitive-again all use the title “Make India Competitive Again - The Ken”, and 3 other titles repeat too. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.

  • 2 pages share a meta description

    https://the-ken.com/columns/zero-shot and https://the-ken.com/podcasts/zero-shot use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 106 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 80 small tap targets

    80 of 136 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

4 to fix50
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • A 8-field form

    Your longest form asks for 8 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 2,747 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 2,747 words of visible text.

2 checks passed
  • 20 calls to action

    The homepage has 20 calls to action, for example “Subscribe”, “Sign up using emailSign up using email” and “Read and apply”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics and Mixpanel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Mixpanel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 4 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at the-ken.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Mixpanel

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 55 issues on the-ken.com, including 22 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25