Website review, no card needed

theaiveeclinic.com logo

theaiveeclinic.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202633 issues · 75 checks

This review found 33 issues worth fixing on theaiveeclinic.com, 11 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.8 s2.6 sMay 2Oct 174.5 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20263.0 s
May 9, 20263.0 s
May 16, 20263.0 s
May 23, 20263.0 s
May 30, 20263.3 s
Jun 6, 20263.5 s
Jun 13, 20264.0 s
Jun 20, 20264.0 s
Jun 27, 20263.9 s
Jul 4, 20264.1 s
Jul 11, 20263.9 s
Jul 18, 20264.1 s
Jul 25, 20264.2 s
Aug 1, 20264.2 s
Aug 8, 20264.5 s
Aug 15, 20264.9 s
Aug 22, 20265.2 s
Aug 29, 20265.5 s
Sep 5, 20265.4 s
Sep 12, 20265.2 s
Sep 19, 20265.2 s
Sep 26, 20265.2 s
Oct 3, 20265.1 s
Oct 10, 20264.9 s
Oct 17, 20264.5 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
100 ms87 msMay 2Oct 1795 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 202695 ms
May 9, 202695 ms
May 16, 202695 ms
May 23, 202695 ms
May 30, 202695 ms
Jun 6, 202695 ms
Jun 13, 202695 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 202695 ms
Jul 4, 202698 ms
Jul 11, 202697 ms
Jul 18, 202695 ms
Jul 25, 202695 ms
Aug 1, 202689 ms
Aug 8, 202688 ms
Aug 15, 202689 ms
Aug 22, 202695 ms
Aug 29, 202696 ms
Sep 5, 202696 ms
Sep 12, 202696 ms
Sep 19, 202695 ms
Sep 26, 202696 ms
Oct 3, 202698 ms
Oct 10, 202698 ms
Oct 17, 202695 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of theaiveeclinic.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. theaiveeclinic.com at 1.3 s1.3 s
  2. theaiveeclinic.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  3. theaiveeclinic.com at 3.9 s3.9 s
  4. theaiveeclinic.com at 5.3 s5.3 s
  5. theaiveeclinic.com at 6.6 s6.6 s
  6. theaiveeclinic.com at 7.9 s7.9 s
  7. theaiveeclinic.com at 9.2 s9.2 s
  8. theaiveeclinic.com at 10.5 s10.5 s

Speed

6 to fix65
  • Render-blocking requests

    4.0 s

    82 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 4.0 s.

  • Font display

    1.1 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 1.1 s).

  • Mobile performance score: 65

    65/100

    Your mobile performance score is 65 (desktop: 88). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 171 KiB

    About 171 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    356 KiB

    About 356 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Main-thread work: 2.2 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.2 s on main-thread work while loading, 979 ms of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    223 KiB

    1 image could be 223 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Minify CSS

    150 ms · 11 KiB

    11 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.

  • 6 third-party services on the page

    6 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Other Google APIs/SDKs and Cloudflare CDN and others), adding 468 KiB and 104 ms of main-thread time.

  • 2 long tasks on the main thread

    2 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 73 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 268 ms

    268 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 268 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 5.2 s

    5.2 s

    Real visitors wait 5.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors wait 2.6 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Speed Index: 14.0 s

    14.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 14.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.8 s

    16.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 4.5 s

    4.5 s

    The first text or image appears after 4.5 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 4.7 s

    4.7 s

    Your largest element takes 4.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image. Most of its time is resource load delay (2.7 s).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 56% slower for real visitors

    +56%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 3.0 s to 4.5 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • 1 image without width and height

    1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +2%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 95 ms to 95 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 97 ms

    97 ms

    Real visitors wait 97 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.02

    0.02

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.019

    0.019

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.019, good is under 0.1).

  • Total Blocking Time: 13 ms

    13 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 13 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

Images and page weight

2 to fix75
  • Page weight: 3.7 MB in 207 requests

    3.7 MB

    Your homepage downloads 3.7 MB in 207 requests on a phone: images 1.4 MB (25), scripts 1.4 MB (74) and fonts 438 KiB (12). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 9 images in older formats

    9 images (547 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.05 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.05 g of CO₂e: 126.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

2 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

6 to fixGoogle 9093
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • The skip-link target should exist and be focusable (1 element)

    The skip-link target should exist and be focusable: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 form fields without a label

    3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 26 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 44 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 44 passed and 6 failed. 3 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8586
  • 7 H1 headlines

    There are 7 <h1> headlines (“What We Know About Sharon Cuneta’s Awe-Inspiring …”, “Dr. Aivee Teo, Dr. Z Teo, Rambo Nuñez, and Maja S…” and “Championing premium beauty: The Aivee Clinic shin…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (354 characters)

    Your meta description is 354 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 3 links crawlers can't follow

    3 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • 1 link with vague text

    1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.

  • 69 internal links, 12 external

    The homepage links to 69 pages on theaiveeclinic.com and 12 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Title: 34 characters

    Your title is a healthy 34 characters: “The Aivee Group | The Aivee Clinic”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://theaiveeclinic.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: BreadcrumbList, Organization, WebPage and WebSite.

  • Open Graph tags complete

    Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://theaiveeclinic.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://theaiveeclinic.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 4 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and description; sameAs (social profiles) and contact details would complete it.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,011 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

100
  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 23 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

1 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 9687
  • 3 small tap targets

    3 of 8 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix86
  • A 8-field form

    Your longest form asks for 8 fields (0 required). Every extra field lowers completion.

  • Only about 157 words

    The homepage has only about 157 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

5 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Book an Appointment”.

  • 6 calls to action

    The homepage has 6 calls to action, for example “Book an Appointment”, “Login/Register” and “Learn More”.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 6 testimonial or review blocks and a star rating.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 4 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 3 trackers load before any consent

    3

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 11 cookies set on arrival

    11

    Opening the homepage sets 11 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at theaiveeclinic.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

CMS
WordPress
Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
WooCommerce
Analytics
Google Analytics

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 33 issues on theaiveeclinic.com, including 16 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25
theaiveeclinic.com website review: scores and fixes