Website review, no card needed
thesage.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 9 November 202641 issues · 83 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on thesage.com, 18 of them high impact, across 83 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
66D- #93,597 of 102,148 reviewed websitesbeats 7%
- #54,202 of 56,703 online storesbeats 4%
- #49,703 of 51,571 Shopify storesbeats 3%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 3.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 3.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.9 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 87 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 102 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 122 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 87 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 95 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 140 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 121 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.8 s
1.6 s
2.4 s
3.2 s
4.0 s
4.7 s
5.5 s
6.3 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
5.3 s · 1.3 MB30 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.3 MB).
Improve image delivery
3.1 s · 899 KiB3 images could be 899 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.1 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
3.5 s27 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 3.5 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.2 s · 196 KiBAbout 196 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.2 s faster on a phone.
3 long tasks on the main thread
3 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 1.1 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Mobile performance score: 56
56/100Your mobile performance score is 56. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Minify JavaScript
310 ms · 24 KiB24 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 19 KiBAbout 19 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (jQuery CDN, Google Fonts and Other Google APIs/SDKs), adding 139 KiB and 85 ms of main-thread time.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
2 checks passed
Main-thread work: 1.7 s
A phone's processor spends 1.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.2 s of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 4.6 s
4.6 sReal visitors wait 4.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user FCP: 3.8 s
3.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 3.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 9.3 s
9.3 sYour largest element takes 9.3 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the element shown below. Most of its time is resource load delay (5.6 s).
Speed Index: 9.9 s
9.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 9.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.1 s
4.1 sThe first text or image appears after 4.1 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Time to Interactive: 9.4 s
9.4 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 9.4 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Tap response (INP) got 26% slower for real visitors
+26%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 87 ms to 121 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) got 13% slower for real visitors
+13%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.9 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.083
0.083The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.083, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 118 ms
118 msScripts block the page for only 118 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
2 images in older formats
2 images (345 KiB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit
0.41 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.41 g of CO₂e: 49.4 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
3 checks passed
Page weight: 1.5 MB in 44 requests
1.5 MBYour homepage downloads 1.5 MB in 44 requests on a phone: images 1,010 KiB (9), scripts 384 KiB (16) and stylesheets 47 KiB (12). That is a lean page.
Images load when needed
Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
6 text elements with low contrast
6 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Links must have discernible text (2 elements)
Links must have discernible text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
<html> element must have a lang attribute (1 element)
<html> element must have a lang attribute: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (2 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
No page language
The <html> element has no lang attribute, so screen readers may read the page in the wrong voice and accent.
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 8 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
28 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 34 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 28 passed and 6 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
Title is short (28 characters)
Your title is only 28 characters: “TheSage - TheSage.com - Home”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
2 H1 headlines
There are 2 <h1> headlines (“Shop Now” and “Majestic Mountain SageIs Closed”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
9 internal links, 1 external
The homepage links to 9 pages on thesage.com and 1 external page.
2 checks passed
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.thesage.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.thesage.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
1 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Other pages
4 linked pages are broken
Your homepage links to https://www.thesage.com/faqs, https://www.thesage.com/contact, https://www.thesage.com/about and https://www.thesage.com/privacy.html, which answer with an error. Visitors hit a dead end and search engines drop them.
2 pages without a meta description
https://www.thesage.com/calcs/index.html and https://www.thesage.com/recipes/recipe-exec have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page with very little text
https://www.thesage.com/recipes/recipe-exec has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
6 internal pages checked
We fetched 6 pages linked from your homepage and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 2 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 small tap targets
2 of 5 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Synchronous `XMLHttpRequest` on the main thread is deprecated because of its detrimental effects to…”).
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
Only about 116 words
The homepage has only about 116 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
2 calls to action
The homepage has 2 calls to action, for example “Shop Now” and “Contact”.
2 short forms
2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Opening hours shown
Your opening hours are on the homepage.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
3 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at thesage.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2025.
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- HotWax Commerce;Shopify;Shopify Plus
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Logan
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on thesage.com, including 16 speed issues, 6 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.