Website review, no card needed
timeleaf.co.kr website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 11 November 202633 issues · 79 checks
This review found 33 issues worth fixing on timeleaf.co.kr, 12 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81B- #33,007 of 97,161 reviewed websitesbeats 60%
- #21,205 of 52,806 online storesbeats 53%
- #20,407 of 47,860 Shopify storesbeats 51%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.8 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 112 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 115 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 125 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 127 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 120 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 100 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 96 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 120 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
4.1 s · 2.7 MBAbout 2.7 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 4.1 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
4.2 s · 1.7 MB10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.7 MB).
Avoid multiple page redirects
2.7 sThe page goes through 1 redirect before it starts loading, costing about 2.7 s. Link and advertise the final URL directly.
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 7.7 s
A phone's processor spends 7.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.3 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, bestfreecdn.com and b-cdn.net and others), adding 2.5 MB and 1.9 s of main-thread time.
Shopify adds 653 ms
653 msShopify costs a phone 653 ms of main-thread work and 598 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
bestfreecdn.com adds 520 ms
520 msbestfreecdn.com costs a phone 520 ms of main-thread work and 852 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
17 long tasks on the main thread
17 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 580 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
b-cdn.net adds 480 ms
480 msb-cdn.net costs a phone 480 ms of main-thread work and 810 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
2,280 HTML elements
The page has 2,280 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 8 KiB1 image could be 8 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
73 KiBAbout 73 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 13 ms
13 msYour server sent the HTML in 13 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 13.0 s
13.0 sYour largest element takes 13.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 31.3 s
31.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 31.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 1.5 s
1.5 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.5 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Speed Index: 4.4 s
4.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 112 ms to 120 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
8 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 716 ms
716 msReal visitors wait 716 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 10% faster for real visitors
-10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 1.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 1.6 s
1.6 sThe first text or image appears after 1.6 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 6.0 MB in 591 requests
6.0 MBYour homepage downloads 6.0 MB in 591 requests on a phone: scripts 3.1 MB (134), images 1.6 MB (242) and other files 868 KiB (157). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
ca943297-5b10-4e31-87f3-c21334da6b81.png is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
4 images far larger than shown
335 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example ac.svg at 1,000 px wide, shown at 24 px. Resized copies would save about 335 KiB.
15 images below the first screen load straight away
15 images further down the page (535 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 1.7 g of CO₂ per visit
1.69 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.69 g of CO₂e: 203.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
1 text element with low contrast
1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 46 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 3 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
3 H1 headlines
There are 3 <h1> headlines (“”, “Leading Distributor of Aesthetic and Cosmetic Pro…” and “Global Beauty, Direct to You”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.
Meta description is long (189 characters)
Your meta description is 189 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
65 internal links, 4 external
The homepage links to 65 pages on timeleaf.co.kr and 4 external pages.
6 checks passed
Title: 61 characters
Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “TIMELEAF – Korean Aesthetic Medical Supplies & Dermal Fillers”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://timeleaf.co.kr/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://timeleaf.co.kr/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://timeleaf.co.kr/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and sameAs (social profiles); description and contact details would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,250 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 linked pages hidden from search
https://timeleaf.co.kr/collections/collagen-regeneraion-pdrn-pla-plla-pcl-ca and https://timeleaf.co.kr/collections/iv-injection are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
https://timeleaf.co.kr/collections/collagen-regeneraion-pdrn-pla-plla-pcl-ca and https://timeleaf.co.kr/collections/iv-injection all use the title “Professionals Only – TIMELEAF”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
4 pages without a meta description
https://timeleaf.co.kr/pages/our-story, https://timeleaf.co.kr/pages/faq-1, https://timeleaf.co.kr/collections/collagen-regeneraion-pdrn-pla-plla-pcl-ca and https://timeleaf.co.kr/collections/iv-injection have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
5 pages without an H1
https://timeleaf.co.kr/pages/our-story, https://timeleaf.co.kr/pages/faq-1, https://timeleaf.co.kr/pages/shipping-policy, https://timeleaf.co.kr/collections/collagen-regeneraion-pdrn-pla-plla-pcl-ca and https://timeleaf.co.kr/collections/iv-injection have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 35 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
7 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a title
All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
Deprecated browser APIs
The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Authorization will not be covered by the wildcard symbol (*) in CORS `Access-Control-Allow-Headers`…”).
3 checks passed
No console errors
No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
Only about 239 words
The homepage has only about 239 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
4 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Sign up Sign up”.
9 calls to action
The homepage has 9 calls to action, for example “CONTACT”, “Sign up Sign up” and “Learn More”.
41 short forms
41 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: LinkedIn Insight.
Privacy and tracking
4 trackers load before any consent
4Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, LinkedIn Insight and Meta Pixel (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
18 cookies set on arrival
18Opening the homepage sets 18 cookies, 2 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
31 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 31 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at timeleaf.co.kr, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 17 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Securify · Tabs Studio · Bucks · Pagefly Ai Page Builder · Parkour Facebook Pixel · Singleton Verify Customers · Hulk Form Builder · Sami Product Labels · Judge Me Reviews · Whatsapp Ck · Bss B2b Solution · Transtore Translate Language · Pop Convert · Whatsapp Abandoned Cart · Pareto Limit Purchase · carthike.com · bestfreecdn.com
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 33 issues on timeleaf.co.kr, including 15 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.