Website review, no card needed

tlmintl.com logo

tlmintl.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202625 issues · 75 checks

This review found 25 issues worth fixing on tlmintl.com, 9 of them high impact, across 75 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
5.1 s2.3 sMay 2Oct 172.6 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 2, 20264.8 s
May 9, 20264.6 s
May 16, 20264.7 s
May 23, 20264.5 s
May 30, 20264.7 s
Jun 6, 20264.7 s
Jun 13, 20264.8 s
Jun 20, 20264.8 s
Jun 27, 20264.8 s
Jul 4, 20264.6 s
Jul 11, 20264.4 s
Jul 18, 20264.5 s
Jul 25, 20264.4 s
Aug 1, 20264.8 s
Aug 8, 20264.7 s
Aug 15, 20264.5 s
Aug 22, 20264.3 s
Aug 29, 20264.2 s
Sep 5, 20264.2 s
Sep 12, 20264.2 s
Sep 19, 20264.3 s
Sep 26, 20264.4 s
Oct 3, 20264.2 s
Oct 10, 20263.7 s
Oct 17, 20262.6 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
139 ms76 msMay 2Oct 1783 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 2, 2026120 ms
May 9, 2026110 ms
May 16, 2026124 ms
May 23, 2026132 ms
May 30, 2026127 ms
Jun 6, 2026111 ms
Jun 13, 2026101 ms
Jun 20, 202696 ms
Jun 27, 202697 ms
Jul 4, 202696 ms
Jul 11, 202698 ms
Jul 18, 202699 ms
Jul 25, 2026100 ms
Aug 1, 202699 ms
Aug 8, 2026103 ms
Aug 15, 2026103 ms
Aug 22, 2026105 ms
Aug 29, 2026103 ms
Sep 5, 2026105 ms
Sep 12, 2026103 ms
Sep 19, 202695 ms
Sep 26, 2026102 ms
Oct 3, 202688 ms
Oct 10, 202688 ms
Oct 17, 202683 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tlmintl.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tlmintl.com at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. tlmintl.com at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. tlmintl.com at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. tlmintl.com at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. tlmintl.com at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. tlmintl.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. tlmintl.com at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. tlmintl.com at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

3 to fix53
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    3.0 s · 578 KiB

    About 578 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 3.0 s faster on a phone.

  • Mobile performance score: 53

    53/100

    Your mobile performance score is 53 (desktop: 97). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 304 ms

    304 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 304 ms of main-thread work and 179 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 3 third-party services on the page

    3 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, vercel-storage.com and Google Analytics), adding 181 KiB and 304 ms of main-thread time.

  • 6 long tasks on the main thread

    6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 245 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 14 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 14 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    150 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 150 ms.

  • Improve image delivery

    90 KiB

    5 images could be 90 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Phones get a much slower page than desktops

    Desktop scores 97 but mobile only 53. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

2 checks passed
  • Main-thread work: 2.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 2.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 956 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 31 ms

    31 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 31 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 9.2 s

    9.2 s

    Your largest element takes 9.2 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.

  • First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    The first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 862 ms

    862 ms

    Real visitors wait 862 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Total Blocking Time: 465 ms

    465 ms

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 465 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 5.0 s

    5.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 5.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

7 checks passed
  • Real-user LCP: 1.8 s

    1.8 s

    Real visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 84 ms

    84 ms

    Real visitors wait 84 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 26% faster for real visitors

    -26%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 120 ms to 83 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 33% faster for real visitors

    -33%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 4.8 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

1 to fix97
  • An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded

    image is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).

  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.44 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.44 g of CO₂e: 53.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

3 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.6 MB in 65 requests

    1.6 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.6 MB in 65 requests on a phone: scripts 868 KiB (15), images 327 KiB (31) and other files 262 KiB (16). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 9193
  • 7 text elements with low contrast

    7 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 5 tap targets too small

    5 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (36 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 36 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (8 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 47 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 10081
  • Title is long (66 characters)

    Your title is 66 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “IT and Networking Equipment Distributor in UAE | TLM International”.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • Meta description is long (295 characters)

    Your meta description is 295 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 96 internal links, 7 external

    The homepage links to 96 pages on tlmintl.com and 7 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Enterprise Networking, Made Simpler”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tlmintl.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tlmintl.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (935 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix80
  • 5 pages without a title

    https://www.tlmintl.com/brand/apc, https://www.tlmintl.com/brand/asus, https://www.tlmintl.com/brand/lenovo, https://www.tlmintl.com/brand/poly and https://www.tlmintl.com/brand/synology have no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.

  • 5 pages without a meta description

    https://www.tlmintl.com/brand/apc, https://www.tlmintl.com/brand/asus, https://www.tlmintl.com/brand/lenovo, https://www.tlmintl.com/brand/poly and https://www.tlmintl.com/brand/synology have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 27 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

Best practices

Google 100100
  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    32 of 37 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix70
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 customer or partner logo. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 869 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 869 words of visible text.

3 checks passed
  • 7 calls to action

    The homepage has 7 calls to action, for example “Contact”, “Get a Quote” and “Request a quote”.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 2 email links.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 2 trackers load before any consent

    2

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 2 cookies set on arrival

    2

    Opening the homepage sets 2 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 3 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 3 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tlmintl.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Vercel

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 25 issues on tlmintl.com, including 10 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25