Website review, no card needed
tobit.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 22 October 202635 issues · 74 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on tobit.com, 10 of them high impact, across 74 checks. The most urgent: chayns-static.space adds 3.6 s. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
81BClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.1 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 135 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 98 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 96 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 97 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 98 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 116 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 113 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 117 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 119 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 193 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 203 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 208 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 204 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 190 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 195 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 196 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 200 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 205 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 201 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
chayns-static.space adds 3.6 s
3.6 schayns-static.space costs a phone 3.6 s of main-thread work and 1.4 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Render-blocking requests
2.5 s6 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.
Main-thread work: 6.0 s
A phone's processor spends 6.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.4 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
3 third-party services on the page
3 third-party services load with your homepage (chayns-static.space, tobit.cloud and tsimg.cloud), adding 1.8 MB and 3.6 s of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 78
78/100Your mobile performance score is 78 (desktop: 71). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
210 ms · 641 KiBAbout 641 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 210 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
300 ms · 264 KiB14 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (264 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
400 ms · 62 KiBAbout 62 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 400 ms faster on a phone.
tsimg.cloud adds 0 ms
0 mstsimg.cloud costs a phone 0 ms of main-thread work and 313 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Font display
250 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 250 ms).
5 long tasks on the main thread
5 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 169 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Improve image delivery
149 KiB1 image could be 149 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Legacy JavaScript
16 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 16 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 307 ms
307 msYour server sent the HTML in 307 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Time to Interactive: 12.6 s
12.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 12.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sThe first text or image appears after 3.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user INP: 269 ms
269 msReal visitors wait 269 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 74% slower for real visitors
+74%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 135 ms to 201 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 35% slower for real visitors
+35%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.7 s to 2.1 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Real-user FCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 877 ms
877 msReal visitors wait 877 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest Contentful Paint: 3.6 s
3.6 sYour largest element takes 3.6 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 4.4 s
4.4 sVisually, the page fills in at 4.4 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 204 ms
204 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 204 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
3 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.2 s
2.2 sReal visitors wait 2.2 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.002
0.002The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.002, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 2.0 MB in 77 requests
2.0 MBYour homepage downloads 2.0 MB in 77 requests on a phone: scripts 1.0 MB (25), fonts 464 KiB (6) and images 314 KiB (18). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (126 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.6 g of CO₂ per visit
0.58 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.58 g of CO₂e: 69.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
11 images without alt text
11 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
1 checks passed
32 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 34 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 32 passed and 2 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (FAQPage and Organization) but with 1 problem, for example “Organization: missing name”.
47 internal links, 2 external
The homepage links to 47 pages on tobit.com and 2 external pages.
5 checks passed
Meta description: 147 characters
Your meta description is 147 characters: “Entdecken Sie die Software-Lösungen von Tobit. Mit david® und chayns® digitalisieren Sie Kommunikation und Geschäftspro…”.
Title: 45 characters
Your title is a healthy 45 characters: “Tobit.Software | Software für Digitalisierung”.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tobit.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
Organization data is thin (2 of 6 facts)
Your Organization JSON-LD is missing name, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details. These are the facts AI assistants use to describe a business and to tell it apart from others with a similar name.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (415 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes /llms.txt (4 KiB, 20 links, though it should open with a “# Title” line), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
/sidekick/agent-store is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
/ and /software all use the title “Tobit.Software | Software für Digitalisierung”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
15 pages without an H1
/software, /teamdavid, /teamdavid/leistungs%C3%BCbersicht, /teamdavid/support, /teamdavid/kaufen and /teamdavid/downloads and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
13 pages with very little text
/teamdavid, /teamdavid/leistungs%C3%BCbersicht, /teamdavid/support, /teamdavid/kaufen, /teamdavid/downloads and /sidekick and 7 others have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 41 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Every page has a meta description
All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “[object Object]”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 333 words of copy
The homepage carries about 333 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
1 call to action
The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “Brand Shop”.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Matomo.
Privacy and tracking
1 cookie set on arrival
1Opening the homepage sets 1 cookie (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
No known trackers before consent
No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tobit.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Matomo
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on tobit.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.