Website review, no card needed
torras.co.jp website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202641 issues · 81 checks
This review found 41 issues worth fixing on torras.co.jp, 19 of them high impact, across 81 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
73C- #81,314 of 109,350 reviewed websitesbeats 22%
- #50,750 of 61,859 online storesbeats 15%
- #47,561 of 56,401 Shopify storesbeats 13%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.9 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 173 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 173 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 161 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 162 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 163 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 158 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 150 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 139 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 133 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 136 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 134 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 126 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 123 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 123 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.3 s14 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.3 s.
Mobile performance score: 45
45/100Your mobile performance score is 45. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 9.3 s
A phone's processor spends 9.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
4,449 HTML elements
The page has 4,449 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Clarity and quickcep.com and others), adding 9.5 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Shopify adds 365 ms
365 msShopify costs a phone 365 ms of main-thread work and 8.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused JavaScript
150 ms · 914 KiBAbout 914 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
803 KiB21 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (803 KiB).
13 long tasks on the main thread
13 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 363 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
quickcep.com adds 217 ms
217 msquickcep.com costs a phone 217 ms of main-thread work and 559 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
smile.io adds 58 ms
58 mssmile.io costs a phone 58 ms of main-thread work and 374 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Improve image delivery
150 ms · 110 KiB7 images could be 110 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Reduce unused CSS
150 ms · 30 KiBAbout 30 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
4 KiB4 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 34 ms
34 msYour server sent the HTML in 34 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 23.9 s
23.9 sYour largest element takes 23.9 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Speed Index: 26.6 s
26.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 26.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 64.0 s
64.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 64.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 629 ms
629 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 629 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user FCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors see the first content after 2.3 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.6 s
2.6 sThe first text or image appears after 2.6 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
1 image without width and height
1 image have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
7 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 2.3 s
2.3 sReal visitors wait 2.3 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 126 ms
126 msReal visitors wait 126 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.00
0.00For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user TTFB: 701 ms
701 msReal visitors wait 701 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 29% faster for real visitors
-29%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 173 ms to 123 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 20% faster for real visitors
-20%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.7 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001
0.001The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 11.6 MB in 337 requests
11.6 MBYour homepage downloads 11.6 MB in 337 requests on a phone: fonts 7.7 MB (6), scripts 2.1 MB (154) and images 781 KiB (26). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
banner-MB-1_7d2a79e4-99ec-43e8-b0a4-ae69e8a7be84.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
About 3.3 g of CO₂ per visit
3.29 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 3.29 g of CO₂e: 394.3 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
2 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Images are sized for phones
No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.
Accessibility
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (96 elements)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 96 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Scrollable region must have keyboard access (1 element)
Scrollable region must have keyboard access: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
14 images without alt text
14 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination (1 element)
Landmarks should have a unique role or role/label/title (i.e. accessible name) combination: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (1 element)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (1 element)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (4 elements).
1 checks passed
50 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 57 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 50 passed and 7 failed. 7 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at torras.co.jp/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
137 internal links, 5 external
The homepage links to 137 pages on torras.co.jp and 5 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 72 characters
Your meta description is 72 characters: “TORRASのiPhoneケースで、機能性とおしゃれを両立させた究極のデザインを体験。あなたのiPhoneをスタイリッシュに守る、上質な選択を。”.
Title: 37 characters
Your title is a healthy 37 characters: “おしゃれ・高機能なiPhoneケース|TORRAS – TORRAS-JP”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://torras.co.jp/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://torras.co.jp/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
3 checks passed
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (401 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://torras.co.jp/llms.txt (11 KiB, 36 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://torras.co.jp/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://torras.co.jp/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://torras.co.jp/customer_authentication/redirect has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
6 pages without an H1
https://torras.co.jp/customer_authentication/redirect, https://torras.co.jp/pages/anniversary-10th, https://torras.co.jp/pages/iphone-18-campain, https://torras.co.jp/pages/airpro-story-page, https://torras.co.jp/pages/phone-case-series and https://torras.co.jp/collections/glass-film have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 56 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
3 checks passed
Linked pages load
6 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
21 small tap targets
21 of 74 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
6 JavaScript errors while loading
6 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Error fetching data from https://ipinfo.io/json: TypeError: Failed to fetch”.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 267 words of copy
The homepage carries about 267 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
2 short forms
2 short forms (2 fields at most) are right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
33 cookies set on arrival
33Opening the homepage sets 33 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
50 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 50 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at torras.co.jp, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Intelligems A B Testing · Ryviu Product Reviews · Microsoft Clarity · Pagefly Ai Page Builder · Attribuly · App Unity Tracking Ga4 · Powerful Form Builder · Zak Affiliate Marketing And Link · Omnisend · quickcep.com · Hulk Product Options
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 41 issues on torras.co.jp, including 19 speed issues, 2 SEO issues and 4 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.