Website review, no card needed
transvision.co.id website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202651 issues · 85 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on transvision.co.id, 18 of them high impact, across 85 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
67DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.8 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 3.0 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 3.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2026 | 225 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 226 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 211 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 190 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.7 s
1.3 s
2.0 s
2.6 s
3.3 s
3.9 s
4.6 s
5.2 s
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.1 s · 7.2 MB93 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (7.2 MB).
Font display
2.6 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.6 s).
Render-blocking requests
2.5 s22 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 2.5 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
1.7 s · 602 KiBAbout 602 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.7 s faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Google/Doubleclick Ads and others), adding 1.3 MB and 985 ms of main-thread time.
Mobile performance score: 55
55/100Your mobile performance score is 55 (desktop: 63). Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Improve image delivery
587 KiB30 images could be 587 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
Reduce unused CSS
450 ms · 65 KiBAbout 65 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Google Tag Manager adds 425 ms
425 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 425 ms of main-thread work and 611 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 2.1 s
A phone's processor spends 2.1 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.1 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 long tasks on the main thread
8 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 198 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Minify CSS
150 ms · 9 KiB9 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Legacy JavaScript
21 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 21 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 2 ms
2 msYour server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 25.1 s
25.1 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 25.1 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.7 s
10.7 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.7 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.9 s
4.9 sThe first text or image appears after 4.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 5.7 s
5.7 sYour largest element takes 5.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Transvision hadir dengan teknologi terbaik yang menghasilka…”. Most of its time is element render delay (3.4 s).
57 images without width and height
57 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 247 ms
247 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 247 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 18% slower for real visitors
+18%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 3.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Not enough real-visitor data yet
Chrome's UX Report (opens in a new tab) has too little real-visitor traffic for this site, so the figures here are lab measurements from Google's test phone on a throttled 4G connection.
2 checks passed
Tap response (INP) got 11% faster for real visitors
-11%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 225 ms to 190 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.068
0.068The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.068, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 10.1 MB in 179 requests
10.1 MBYour homepage downloads 10.1 MB in 179 requests on a phone: images 7.5 MB (83), scripts 1.4 MB (36) and fonts 1.0 MB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 1.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
25 images in older formats
25 images (6.9 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
1 image far larger than shown
40 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example hotel_bali.jpg at 1,170 px wide, shown at 314 px. Resized copies would save about 40 KiB.
12 images below the first screen load straight away
12 images further down the page (265 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.9 g of CO₂ per visit
2.86 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.86 g of CO₂e: 343.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children (1 element)
Certain ARIA roles must contain particular children: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated critical by axe-core.
2 text elements with low contrast
2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name (1 element)
ARIA input fields must have an accessible name: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
26 images without alt text
26 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (15 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 15 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
No main landmark
The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
6 links without text
6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
2 form fields without a label
2 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Page language is “zxx”
The page declares lang=“zxx”, which is not a usable language code (“zxx” means “no linguistic content”), so screen readers and translation tools guess.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
33 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 43 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 33 passed and 10 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (27 characters)
Your title is only 27 characters: “TV Berlangganan Transvision”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
Meta description is short (67 characters)
Your meta description is only 67 characters: “Official Website Transvision, TV Berlangganan Keluarga, Kualitas HD”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at transvision.co.id/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
35 internal links, 13 external
The homepage links to 35 pages on transvision.co.id and 13 external pages.
1 checks passed
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://transvision.co.id/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://transvision.co.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
There is no robots.txt, so nothing stops the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity from reading the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (962 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
14 pages share a title
/, https://transvision.co.id/beranda, https://transvision.co.id/paket/satellite-diamond.html, https://transvision.co.id/paket/satellite-platinum.html, https://transvision.co.id/paket/satellite-gold.html and https://transvision.co.id/benefit.html and 8 others all use the title “TV Berlangganan Transvision”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://transvision.co.id/bayar.html has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
14 pages share a meta description
https://transvision.co.id/beranda, https://transvision.co.id/paket/satellite-diamond.html, https://transvision.co.id/paket/satellite-platinum.html, https://transvision.co.id/paket/satellite-gold.html, https://transvision.co.id/xstream.html and https://transvision.co.id/benefit.html and 8 others use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
12 pages without an H1
https://transvision.co.id/beranda, https://transvision.co.id/xstream.html, https://transvision.co.id/benefit.html, https://transvision.co.id/syarat-ketentuan.html, https://transvision.co.id/bayar.html and https://transvision.co.id/carabayar and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
6 pages with very little text
https://transvision.co.id/bayar.html, https://transvision.co.id/carabayar, https://transvision.co.id/bayar/via-credit-card.html, https://transvision.co.id/bayar/via-cash.html, https://transvision.co.id/bayar/via-internet-banking.html and https://transvision.co.id/bayar/via-mobile-banking.html have under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 34 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
4 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
2 broken images
2 images failed to load on a phone, for example https://transvision.co.id/img/mobile2/Responsive-Banner-Transvision-(750x440)%20(1)%20KPLUS.jpg.
3 small tap targets
3 of 11 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 (Not Found)”.
1 distorted image
1 image is displayed at the wrong aspect ratio, so it looks stretched or squashed.
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,464 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,464 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 52 testimonial or review blocks, a star rating and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and The Trade Desk and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
27 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 27 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at transvision.co.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- Akamai Cloud
Company
- Founded
- 1997
- Headquarters
- Jakarta
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on transvision.co.id, including 16 speed issues, 7 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.