Website review, no card needed

trendsbysarando.it logo

trendsbysarando.it website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 7 November 202620 issues · 79 checks

This review found 20 issues worth fixing on trendsbysarando.it, 8 of them high impact, across 79 checks. The most urgent: 2 text elements with low contrast. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
1.4 s1.2 sMay 16Oct 311.2 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.4 s
May 23, 20261.4 s
May 30, 20261.3 s
Jun 6, 20261.3 s
Jun 13, 20261.3 s
Jun 20, 20261.4 s
Jun 27, 20261.4 s
Jul 4, 20261.4 s
Jul 11, 20261.4 s
Jul 18, 20261.4 s
Jul 25, 20261.4 s
Aug 1, 20261.4 s
Aug 8, 20261.4 s
Aug 15, 20261.4 s
Aug 22, 20261.4 s
Aug 29, 20261.4 s
Sep 5, 20261.4 s
Sep 12, 20261.4 s
Sep 19, 20261.3 s
Sep 26, 20261.3 s
Oct 3, 20261.3 s
Oct 10, 20261.2 s
Oct 17, 20261.2 s
Oct 24, 20261.2 s
Oct 31, 20261.2 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
204 ms133 msMay 16Oct 31196 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026143 ms
May 23, 2026141 ms
May 30, 2026144 ms
Jun 6, 2026146 ms
Jun 13, 2026149 ms
Jun 20, 2026152 ms
Jun 27, 2026152 ms
Jul 4, 2026152 ms
Jul 11, 2026152 ms
Jul 18, 2026155 ms
Jul 25, 2026160 ms
Aug 1, 2026165 ms
Aug 8, 2026169 ms
Aug 15, 2026168 ms
Aug 22, 2026169 ms
Aug 29, 2026169 ms
Sep 5, 2026170 ms
Sep 12, 2026171 ms
Sep 19, 2026176 ms
Sep 26, 2026183 ms
Oct 3, 2026191 ms
Oct 10, 2026194 ms
Oct 17, 2026194 ms
Oct 24, 2026194 ms
Oct 31, 2026196 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of trendsbysarando.it (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. trendsbysarando.it at 0.4 s0.4 s
  2. trendsbysarando.it at 0.8 s0.8 s
  3. trendsbysarando.it at 1.1 s1.1 s
  4. trendsbysarando.it at 1.5 s1.5 s
  5. trendsbysarando.it at 1.9 s1.9 s
  6. trendsbysarando.it at 2.3 s2.3 s
  7. trendsbysarando.it at 2.6 s2.6 s
  8. trendsbysarando.it at 3.0 s3.0 s

Speed

1 to fix99
  • Render-blocking requests

    700 ms

    4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 700 ms.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and Clarity and others), adding 701 KiB and 356 ms of main-thread time.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    223 KiB

    9 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (223 KiB).

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    133 KiB

    About 133 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • 4 long tasks on the main thread

    4 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 82 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    32 KiB

    About 32 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    13 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 13 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Improve image delivery

    4 KiB

    1 image could be 4 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

3 checks passed
  • Mobile performance score: 99

    99/100

    Your mobile performance score is 99. That is in Google's “good” band (90 and up).

  • Main-thread work: 0.9 s

    A phone's processor spends 0.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 469 ms of it running JavaScript. That is comfortably low.

  • Server response: 69 ms

    69 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 69 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

2 to fix100
  • Time to Interactive: 9.3 s

    9.3 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 9.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) got 37% slower for real visitors

    +37%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 143 ms to 196 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

12 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors wait 1.0 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 173 ms

    173 ms

    Real visitors wait 173 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 750 ms

    750 ms

    Real visitors wait 750 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Largest content (LCP) got 12% faster for real visitors

    -12%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.4 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Speed Index: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 2.3 s (Speed Index), inside the 3.4 s “good” threshold.

  • Total Blocking Time: 70 ms

    70 ms

    Scripts block the page for only 70 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.001

    0.001

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.001, good is under 0.1).

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Your largest element renders in 1.4 s on a phone, inside Google's 2.5 s “good” threshold. The largest element is the text “🔄”.

Images and page weight

100
  • About 0.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    0.37 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.37 g of CO₂e: 45.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

4 checks passed
  • Page weight: 1.3 MB in 78 requests

    1.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 1.3 MB in 78 requests on a phone: scripts 846 KiB (37), images 196 KiB (19) and fonts 139 KiB (4). That is a lean page.

  • Images use modern formats

    Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.

  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

  • Images are sized for phones

    No image is downloaded at more than three times the size it is drawn on a phone.

Accessibility

5 to fixGoogle 8793
  • 2 text elements with low contrast

    2 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • <svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text (2 elements)

    <svg> elements with an img or image role must have alternative text: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated serious by axe-core.

  • Malformed lists

    Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (10 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 10 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 9 links without text

    9 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h2 → h5), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 19 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 48 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 54 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 48 passed and 6 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

5 to fixGoogle 9271
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • Title is short (18 characters)

    Your title is only 18 characters: “TrendsBySarando.it”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • One H1 headline

    Your <h1> is empty.

  • 51 internal links, 5 external

    The homepage links to 51 pages on trendsbysarando.it and 5 external pages.

3 checks passed
  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.trendsbysarando.it/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.trendsbysarando.it/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

3 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (636 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://www.trendsbysarando.it/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 4 pages without a meta description

    https://www.trendsbysarando.it/collections/all, https://www.trendsbysarando.it/collections/calendari-dellavvento, https://www.trendsbysarando.it/products/mystery-gift and https://www.trendsbysarando.it/collections/homepage have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 9 pages without an H1

    https://www.trendsbysarando.it/apps/parcelpanel, https://www.trendsbysarando.it/products/calendario-dellavvento-pokemon-edizione-2026-un-mese-pieno-di-sorprese, https://www.trendsbysarando.it/products/calendario-dellavvento-di-stitch-2026, https://www.trendsbysarando.it/products/ssd-portatile-di-archiviazione-esterno-alta-velocita-usb-c-1050mbs, https://www.trendsbysarando.it/products/mystery-gift and https://www.trendsbysarando.it/products/cara-bambola-lana-waldorf-morbida-resistente-e-fatta-a-mano and 3 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 23 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    14 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 10084
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=187219355&Ver=2&mid=bf91a5ec-cdaa-423c-adeb-b0bce0af7d6d&bo=3&sid=ffc2b6a0da4011f1a75017844a650711&vid=ffc300c0da4011f1a88ac3fe5e5b6761&vids=0&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&l.

3 checks passed
  • No console errors

    No JavaScript errors were logged while the page loaded on a phone.

  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    24 of 27 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix71
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • About 366 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 366 words of visible text.

  • Urgency cues

    The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).

5 checks passed
  • 1 call to action

    The homepage has 1 call to action, for example “track your order page”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (3 fields at most) are right on the homepage, asking for an email.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Microsoft Clarity.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 0 phone links and 1 email link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Tag Manager, Klaviyo, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 18 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 18 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at trendsbysarando.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Apps on your store

Your storefront loads 13 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.

Apps your storefront loads

Pandectes Gdpr · T Lab Ai Translate · Kaching Bundles · Judge Me Reviews · Simprosys Google Shopping Feed · Ymq Product Options · Klaviyo Email Marketing Sms · Hulk Form Builder · Gdpr Cookie Consent · Content Translation · Aftersell · Boo Eu Withdrawal Button · wetracked.io

Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
E-commerce
Shopify
Hosting
Shopify

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 20 issues on trendsbysarando.it, including 3 speed issues, 5 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25