Website review, no card needed

tri.co.id logo

tri.co.id website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202651 issues · 71 checks

This review found 51 issues worth fixing on tri.co.id, 26 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
6.1 s5.1 sMay 9Oct 246.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20265.4 s
May 16, 20265.4 s
May 23, 20265.4 s
May 30, 20265.3 s
Jun 6, 20265.3 s
Jun 13, 20265.2 s
Jun 20, 20265.3 s
Jun 27, 20265.4 s
Jul 4, 20265.5 s
Jul 11, 20265.5 s
Jul 18, 20265.4 s
Jul 25, 20265.4 s
Aug 1, 20265.4 s
Aug 8, 20265.4 s
Aug 15, 20265.5 s
Aug 22, 20265.5 s
Aug 29, 20265.7 s
Sep 5, 20265.8 s
Sep 12, 20265.8 s
Sep 19, 20265.9 s
Sep 26, 20265.9 s
Oct 3, 20265.9 s
Oct 10, 20266.0 s
Oct 17, 20266.0 s
Oct 24, 20266.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
354 ms282 msMay 9Oct 24346 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026296 ms
May 16, 2026293 ms
May 23, 2026290 ms
May 30, 2026290 ms
Jun 6, 2026294 ms
Jun 13, 2026301 ms
Jun 20, 2026304 ms
Jun 27, 2026308 ms
Jul 4, 2026310 ms
Jul 11, 2026311 ms
Jul 18, 2026312 ms
Jul 25, 2026310 ms
Aug 1, 2026305 ms
Aug 8, 2026304 ms
Aug 15, 2026306 ms
Aug 22, 2026311 ms
Aug 29, 2026317 ms
Sep 5, 2026321 ms
Sep 12, 2026323 ms
Sep 19, 2026324 ms
Sep 26, 2026326 ms
Oct 3, 2026328 ms
Oct 10, 2026331 ms
Oct 17, 2026339 ms
Oct 24, 2026346 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tri.co.id (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tri.co.id at 2.2 s2.2 s
  2. tri.co.id at 4.3 s4.3 s
  3. tri.co.id at 6.5 s6.5 s
  4. tri.co.id at 8.7 s8.7 s
  5. tri.co.id at 10.9 s10.9 s
  6. tri.co.id at 13.0 s13.0 s
  7. tri.co.id at 15.2 s15.2 s
  8. tri.co.id at 17.4 s17.4 s

Speed

11 to fix9
  • Render-blocking requests

    9.1 s

    15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 9.1 s.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    5.2 s · 919 KiB

    About 919 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.2 s faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    2.2 s

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.2 s).

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.8 s · 360 KiB

    11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (360 KiB).

  • Mobile performance score: 9

    9/100

    Your mobile performance score is 9 (desktop: 28). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Improve image delivery

    1.9 MB

    6 images could be 1.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.2 MB and 941 ms of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 397 ms

    397 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 397 ms of main-thread work and 572 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 388 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Facebook adds 295 ms

    295 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 295 ms of main-thread work and 342 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Main-thread work: 3.0 s

    A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    260 ms · 66 KiB

    About 66 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 260 ms faster on a phone.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    41 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 1 ms

    1 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

12 to fix0
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Real-user LCP: 7.8 s

    7.8 s

    Real visitors wait 7.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user CLS: 1.77

    1.77

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.77 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 4.8 s

    4.8 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 4.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • First Contentful Paint: 7.7 s

    7.7 s

    The first text or image appears after 7.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 19.0 s

    19.0 s

    Your largest element takes 19.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “First slide”. Most of its time is resource load delay (12.3 s).

  • Speed Index: 25.6 s

    25.6 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 25.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 23.8 s

    23.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 23.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.89

    0.89

    The layout shifts by 0.89 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s

    1.0 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user INP: 407 ms

    407 ms

    Real visitors wait 407 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • 5 images without width and height

    5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors

    +16%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 296 ms to 346 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors

    +10%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.4 s to 6.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

1 checks passed
  • Real-user TTFB: 778 ms

    778 ms

    Real visitors wait 778 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 8.5 MB in 82 requests

    8.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 8.5 MB in 82 requests on a phone: images 6.3 MB (27), scripts 1.9 MB (27) and fonts 141 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 1 image over 500 KB

    20260715_Website-Biometric_Komdigi_mobile-IND.jpg weighs 1.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 2 images far larger than shown

    828 KiB

    2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 20260715_Website-Biometric_Komdigi_mobile-IND.jpg at 1,502 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 828 KiB.

  • 6 images in older formats

    6 images (2.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 2 images below the first screen load straight away

    2 images further down the page (658 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit

    2.41 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.41 g of CO₂e: 289.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

4 to fixGoogle 8493
  • 1 button without a name

    1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.

  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

1 checks passed
  • 37 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

10 to fixGoogle 7551
  • No meta description

    No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • No H1 headline

    There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.

  • Title is short (13 characters)

    Your title is only 13 characters: “Tri Indonesia”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.

  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 30 links crawlers can't follow

    30 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • No canonical URL

    No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • No XML sitemap

    No XML sitemap at https://tri.co.id/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.

  • No robots.txt

    There is no robots.txt at tri.co.id/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.

  • Only 0 internal links

    The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

AI search readiness

1 to fix69
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://tri.co.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

Best practices

2 to fixGoogle 10078
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://tri.co.id/.

  • 1 JavaScript error while loading

    1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Promise.allSettled is not a function”.

  • Missing source maps

    Large scripts ship without source maps.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

5 to fix33
  • No call to action on the first screen

    On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.

  • No calls to action

    We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.

  • No social proof

    No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.

  • No direct contact details

    No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.

  • Only about 8 words

    The homepage has only about 8 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.

  • No form on the homepage

    There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

1 checks passed
  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 6 trackers load before any consent

    6

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 14 cookies set on arrival

    14

    Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 14 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tri.co.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

  • The footer still says © 2018.

Stack

Framework
Bootstrap
Analytics
Google Analytics
Hosting
INDOSAT Internet Network Provider

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 51 issues on tri.co.id, including 23 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25