Website review, no card needed
tri.co.id website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 28 October 202651 issues · 71 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on tri.co.id, 26 of them high impact, across 71 checks. The most urgent: render-blocking requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
46FClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 5.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 5.3 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 5.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 5.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 5.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 5.8 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 5.9 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 6.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 6.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 296 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 293 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 290 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 290 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 294 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 301 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 312 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 310 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 304 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 306 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 321 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 323 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 324 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 326 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 328 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 331 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 339 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 346 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
9.1 s15 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 9.1 s.
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.2 s · 919 KiBAbout 919 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.2 s faster on a phone.
Font display
2.2 sWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 2.2 s).
Use efficient cache lifetimes
1.8 s · 360 KiB11 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (360 KiB).
Mobile performance score: 9
9/100Your mobile performance score is 9 (desktop: 28). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Improve image delivery
1.9 MB6 images could be 1.9 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Facebook and TikTok and others), adding 1.2 MB and 941 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 397 ms
397 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 397 ms of main-thread work and 572 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
15 long tasks on the main thread
15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 388 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Facebook adds 295 ms
295 msFacebook costs a phone 295 ms of main-thread work and 342 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.0 s
A phone's processor spends 3.0 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.7 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
260 ms · 66 KiBAbout 66 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 260 ms faster on a phone.
Legacy JavaScript
41 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
1 checks passed
Server response: 1 ms
1 msYour server sent the HTML in 1 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Real-user LCP: 7.8 s
7.8 sReal visitors wait 7.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 1.77
1.77For real visitors the layout shifts by 1.77 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 4.8 s
4.8 sReal visitors see the first content after 4.8 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 7.7 s
7.7 sThe first text or image appears after 7.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.0 s
19.0 sYour largest element takes 19.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “First slide”. Most of its time is resource load delay (12.3 s).
Speed Index: 25.6 s
25.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 25.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 23.8 s
23.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.89
0.89The layout shifts by 0.89 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Total Blocking Time: 1.0 s
1.0 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 1.0 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 407 ms
407 msReal visitors wait 407 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
5 images without width and height
5 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) got 16% slower for real visitors
+16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 296 ms to 346 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) got 10% slower for real visitors
+10%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 5.4 s to 6.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
1 checks passed
Real-user TTFB: 778 ms
778 msReal visitors wait 778 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 8.5 MB in 82 requests
8.5 MBYour homepage downloads 8.5 MB in 82 requests on a phone: images 6.3 MB (27), scripts 1.9 MB (27) and fonts 141 KiB (3). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image over 500 KB
20260715_Website-Biometric_Komdigi_mobile-IND.jpg weighs 1.2 MB. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
2 images far larger than shown
828 KiB2 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 20260715_Website-Biometric_Komdigi_mobile-IND.jpg at 1,502 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 828 KiB.
6 images in older formats
6 images (2.8 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
2 images below the first screen load straight away
2 images further down the page (658 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.4 g of CO₂ per visit
2.41 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.41 g of CO₂e: 289.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
3 text elements with low contrast
3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)
Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
1 checks passed
37 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 41 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 37 passed and 4 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
No meta description
No meta description, so Google writes its own snippet from whatever text it finds.
No H1 headline
There is no <h1>, so neither visitors nor Google get a clear main headline.
Title is short (13 characters)
Your title is only 13 characters: “Tri Indonesia”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
No structured data
No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.
30 links crawlers can't follow
30 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.
No canonical URL
No canonical URL, so duplicate versions of the homepage (with or without www, with tracking parameters) can split ranking signals.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
No XML sitemap
No XML sitemap at https://tri.co.id/sitemap.xml, so Google discovers your pages only by following links.
No robots.txt
There is no robots.txt at tri.co.id/robots.txt, the first file search crawlers ask for.
Only 0 internal links
The homepage links to only 0 pages on your own site, so visitors and crawlers find few routes into the rest of it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://tri.co.id/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://tri.co.id/.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Uncaught TypeError: Promise.allSettled is not a function”.
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
6 of 6 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
Only about 8 words
The homepage has only about 8 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
1 checks passed
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel.
Privacy and tracking
6 trackers load before any consent
6Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and TikTok Pixel and 1 more (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
14 cookies set on arrival
14Opening the homepage sets 14 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
14 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 14 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tri.co.id, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
- The footer still says © 2018.
Stack
- Framework
- Bootstrap
- Analytics
- Google Analytics
- Hosting
- INDOSAT Internet Network Provider
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on tri.co.id, including 23 speed issues, 10 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.