Website review, no card needed

trine.edu logo

trine.edu website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202638 issues · 89 checks

This review found 38 issues worth fixing on trine.edu, 15 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
2.6 s1.1 sMay 16Oct 312.0 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20261.8 s
May 23, 20261.8 s
May 30, 20261.7 s
Jun 6, 20261.9 s
Jun 13, 20262.0 s
Jun 20, 20261.9 s
Jun 27, 20261.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.0 s
Jul 11, 20262.1 s
Jul 18, 20262.4 s
Jul 25, 20262.4 s
Aug 1, 20262.4 s
Aug 8, 20262.3 s
Aug 15, 20262.2 s
Aug 22, 20261.5 s
Aug 29, 20261.3 s
Sep 5, 20261.3 s
Sep 12, 20261.2 s
Sep 19, 20261.4 s
Sep 26, 20261.7 s
Oct 3, 20261.7 s
Oct 10, 20261.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.0 s
Oct 24, 20261.9 s
Oct 31, 20262.0 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
207 ms92 msMay 16Oct 31194 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026145 ms
May 23, 2026147 ms
May 30, 2026138 ms
Jun 6, 2026144 ms
Jun 13, 2026130 ms
Jun 20, 2026124 ms
Jun 27, 2026105 ms
Jul 4, 2026121 ms
Jul 11, 2026128 ms
Jul 18, 2026130 ms
Jul 25, 2026137 ms
Aug 1, 2026141 ms
Aug 8, 2026147 ms
Aug 15, 2026172 ms
Aug 22, 2026144 ms
Aug 29, 2026138 ms
Sep 5, 2026137 ms
Sep 12, 2026130 ms
Sep 19, 2026135 ms
Sep 26, 2026147 ms
Oct 3, 2026154 ms
Oct 10, 2026166 ms
Oct 17, 2026189 ms
Oct 24, 2026183 ms
Oct 31, 2026194 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of trine.edu (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. trine.edu at 0.6 s0.6 s
  2. trine.edu at 1.2 s1.2 s
  3. trine.edu at 1.8 s1.8 s
  4. trine.edu at 2.4 s2.4 s
  5. trine.edu at 3.0 s3.0 s
  6. trine.edu at 3.6 s3.6 s
  7. trine.edu at 4.2 s4.2 s
  8. trine.edu at 4.7 s4.7 s

Speed

12 to fix32
  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    61.6 s · 14.7 MB

    49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14.7 MB).

  • Improve image delivery

    2.4 s · 1.6 MB

    13 images could be 1.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    1.8 s

    12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 1.4 s

    1.4 s

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 32

    32/100

    Your mobile performance score is 32. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.7 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, YouTube and Facebook and others), adding 2.8 MB and 2.9 s of main-thread time.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 ms · 1.2 MB

    About 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • YouTube adds 765 ms

    765 ms

    YouTube costs a phone 765 ms of main-thread work and 1,004 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 165 KiB

    About 165 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Facebook adds 402 ms

    402 ms

    Facebook costs a phone 402 ms of main-thread work and 439 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 360 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Document request latency

    68 KiB

    The HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Legacy JavaScript

    33 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

  • Minify JavaScript

    3 KiB

    3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 83 ms

    83 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 83 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

7 to fix100
  • Largest Contentful Paint: 68.0 s

    68.0 s

    Your largest element takes 68.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Student working in chemistry lab”.

  • Speed Index: 27.9 s

    27.9 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 27.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Time to Interactive: 82.5 s

    82.5 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 82.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 2.2 s

    2.2 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 2.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Tap response (INP) got 29% slower for real visitors

    +29%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 194 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s

    2.9 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • 10 images without width and height

    10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +7%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

7 checks passed
  • Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).

  • Real-user LCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 185 ms

    185 ms

    Real visitors wait 185 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.07

    0.07

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 588 ms

    588 ms

    Real visitors wait 588 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

5 to fix18
  • Page weight: 17.5 MB in 157 requests

    17.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 17.5 MB in 157 requests on a phone: images 14.1 MB (40), scripts 2.7 MB (39) and fonts 356 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 2 images over 500 KB

    2 images weigh 12.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 4 images far larger than shown

    560 KiB

    4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example community-1.jpg at 2,000 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 560 KiB.

  • 16 images in older formats

    16 images (14.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 9 images below the first screen load straight away

    9 images further down the page (1.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 5.0 g of CO₂ per visit

    4.97 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.97 g of CO₂e: 596.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

2 to fixGoogle 9697
  • 16 text elements with low contrast

    16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 link without text

    1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.

  • Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.

    Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).

2 checks passed
  • Every image has alt text

    All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.

  • 41 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 1 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 9291
  • Structured data has 1 problem

    Structured data found (untyped) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Unexpected token ']', ..."lege", ], "url"... is not va)”.

  • No social preview image

    No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.

  • 9 links with vague text

    9 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 97 internal links, 20 external

    The homepage links to 97 pages on trine.edu and 20 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • Meta description: 138 characters

    Your meta description is 138 characters: “Experience Trine University’s vibrant community, innovative programs, and exceptional student support. Join us to shape…”.

  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Realize your potential”.

  • Title: 43 characters

    Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Be filled with purpose at Trine University!”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.trine.edu/index.aspx.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.trine.edu/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://trine.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,033 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 14 pages without a meta description

    https://trine.edu/academics, https://trine.edu/academics/majors-degrees, https://trine.edu/online/degrees/index.aspx, https://trine.edu/admission-aid/dual-enrollment, https://trine.edu/academics/academic-programs and https://trine.edu/career-services and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.

  • 10 links to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 10 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://trine.edu/academics, whose canonical is https://trine.edu/academics/index.aspx. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 67 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • Every page has an H1

    Each page we checked has a main headline.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

4 to fixGoogle 7370
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=5318032&Ver=2&mid=c8f1d9d6-864c-43fc-ad1d-156ba5b37792&bo=1&sid=d5653e90d83011f1b2b0a36eeaf29873&vid=d56550b0d83011f19abe93694cbee55b&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg=.

  • 8 small tap targets

    8 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.

  • 1 third-party cookie

    1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Missing catalog/course configuration”.

  • Browser-reported issues

    Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

1 to fix94
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • About 982 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 982 words of visible text.

8 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start your journey”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “How to Apply”, “Request Information” and “Apply”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Social proof on the page

    Social proof on the homepage: 81 testimonial or review blocks and 3 trust badges.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Matomo.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

  • Risk reducer mentioned

    A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.

Privacy and tracking

1 to fix
  • 7 trackers load before any consent

    7

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.

  • 16 cookies set on arrival

    16

    Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 37 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 37 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at trine.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Analytics
Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Matomo
Hosting
Ilight Net

Company

Employees
582
Founded
1884
Headquarters
Angola

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 38 issues on trine.edu, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25