Website review, no card needed
trine.edu website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202638 issues · 89 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on trine.edu, 15 of them high impact, across 89 checks. The most urgent: use efficient cache lifetimes. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
79CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.1 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.8 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.0 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.9 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 2.0 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 145 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 147 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 124 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 121 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 128 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 141 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 172 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 144 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 138 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 137 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 130 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 135 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 147 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 154 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 166 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 189 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 183 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 194 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Use efficient cache lifetimes
61.6 s · 14.7 MB49 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (14.7 MB).
Improve image delivery
2.4 s · 1.6 MB13 images could be 1.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.4 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.8 s12 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.8 s.
Google Tag Manager adds 1.4 s
1.4 sGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 1.4 s of main-thread work and 1.1 MB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 32
32/100Your mobile performance score is 32. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 5.7 s
A phone's processor spends 5.7 s on main-thread work while loading, 3.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, YouTube and Facebook and others), adding 2.8 MB and 2.9 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused JavaScript
300 ms · 1.2 MBAbout 1.2 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
YouTube adds 765 ms
765 msYouTube costs a phone 765 ms of main-thread work and 1,004 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 165 KiBAbout 165 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
Facebook adds 402 ms
402 msFacebook costs a phone 402 ms of main-thread work and 439 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
20 long tasks on the main thread
20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 360 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Document request latency
68 KiBThe HTML itself could arrive sooner: redirects, a slow server response or missing compression delay everything after it.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Legacy JavaScript
33 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
Minify JavaScript
3 KiB3 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
1 checks passed
Server response: 83 ms
83 msYour server sent the HTML in 83 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 68.0 s
68.0 sYour largest element takes 68.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Student working in chemistry lab”.
Speed Index: 27.9 s
27.9 sVisually, the page fills in at 27.9 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Time to Interactive: 82.5 s
82.5 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 82.5 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Total Blocking Time: 2.2 s
2.2 sScripts block taps and scrolling for 2.2 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Tap response (INP) got 29% slower for real visitors
+29%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 145 ms to 194 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
First Contentful Paint: 2.9 s
2.9 sThe first text or image appears after 2.9 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
10 images without width and height
10 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.8 s to 2.0 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
7 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 185 ms
185 msReal visitors wait 185 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.07
0.07For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.07 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.7 s
1.7 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.7 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 588 ms
588 msReal visitors wait 588 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0
0The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).
Images and page weight
Page weight: 17.5 MB in 157 requests
17.5 MBYour homepage downloads 17.5 MB in 157 requests on a phone: images 14.1 MB (40), scripts 2.7 MB (39) and fonts 356 KiB (11). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
2 images over 500 KB
2 images weigh 12.3 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
4 images far larger than shown
560 KiB4 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example community-1.jpg at 2,000 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 560 KiB.
16 images in older formats
16 images (14.0 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
9 images below the first screen load straight away
9 images further down the page (1.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 5.0 g of CO₂ per visit
4.97 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 4.97 g of CO₂e: 596.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
16 text elements with low contrast
16 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 28 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 42 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 1 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Structured data has 1 problem
Structured data found (untyped) but with 1 problem, for example “ld+json block 1 is not valid JSON (Unexpected token ']', ..."lege", ], "url"... is not va)”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image (also missing: og:title, og:description), so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
9 links with vague text
9 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
97 internal links, 20 external
The homepage links to 97 pages on trine.edu and 20 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 138 characters
Your meta description is 138 characters: “Experience Trine University’s vibrant community, innovative programs, and exceptional student support. Join us to shape…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Realize your potential”.
Title: 43 characters
Your title is a healthy 43 characters: “Be filled with purpose at Trine University!”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.trine.edu/index.aspx.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.trine.edu/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
No llms.txt
There is no https://trine.edu/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
2 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,033 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
14 pages without a meta description
https://trine.edu/academics, https://trine.edu/academics/majors-degrees, https://trine.edu/online/degrees/index.aspx, https://trine.edu/admission-aid/dual-enrollment, https://trine.edu/academics/academic-programs and https://trine.edu/career-services and 8 others have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
10 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 10 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://trine.edu/academics, whose canonical is https://trine.edu/academics/index.aspx. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 67 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 broken image
1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=5318032&Ver=2&mid=c8f1d9d6-864c-43fc-ad1d-156ba5b37792&bo=1&sid=d5653e90d83011f1b2b0a36eeaf29873&vid=d56550b0d83011f19abe93694cbee55b&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=918639831&lg=.
8 small tap targets
8 of 19 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
1 third-party cookie
1 third-party cookie is set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
3 JavaScript errors while loading
3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Missing catalog/course configuration”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
About 982 words of copy
The homepage carries about 982 words of visible text.
8 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Start your journey”.
11 calls to action
The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “How to Apply”, “Request Information” and “Apply”.
1 short form
A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 81 testimonial or review blocks and 3 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Meta Pixel and Matomo.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 0 email links.
Phone number on the homepage
Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.
Risk reducer mentioned
A guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card or similar) is mentioned on the page.
Privacy and tracking
7 trackers load before any consent
7Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Meta Pixel and Microsoft Ads and 2 mores (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
16 cookies set on arrival
16Opening the homepage sets 16 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
37 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 37 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at trine.edu, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Matomo
- Hosting
- Ilight Net
Company
- Employees
- 582
- Founded
- 1884
- Headquarters
- Angola
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on trine.edu, including 19 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.