Website review, no card needed
trixiecosmetics.com website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 5 November 202651 issues · 92 checks
This review found 51 issues worth fixing on trixiecosmetics.com, 19 of them high impact, across 92 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
78C- #53,855 of 105,961 reviewed websitesbeats 44%
- #35,023 of 59,664 online storesbeats 36%
- #33,471 of 54,386 Shopify storesbeats 33%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.3 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 16, 2026 | 106 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 105 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 105 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 104 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 108 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 103 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 101 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 100 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.5 s
1.0 s
1.5 s
2.0 s
2.4 s
2.9 s
3.4 s
3.9 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
9.7 s · 2.1 MBAbout 2.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 9.7 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.5 s · 4.2 MB29 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (4.2 MB).
Mobile performance score: 42
42/100Your mobile performance score is 42. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
Main-thread work: 4.3 s
A phone's processor spends 4.3 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Improve image delivery
600 ms · 3.2 MB7 images could be 3.2 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (YouTube, Shopify and Hexton and others), adding 7.0 MB and 1.5 s of main-thread time.
Reduce unused CSS
770 ms · 179 KiBAbout 179 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 770 ms faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
750 ms7 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 750 ms.
Hexton adds 232 ms
232 msHexton costs a phone 232 ms of main-thread work and 4.7 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
YouTube adds 515 ms
515 msYouTube costs a phone 515 ms of main-thread work and 987 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Minify JavaScript
300 ms · 60 KiB60 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.
Shopify adds 296 ms
296 msShopify costs a phone 296 ms of main-thread work and 523 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 61 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 61 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
14 long tasks on the main thread
14 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 206 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Font display
50 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 8 ms
8 msYour server sent the HTML in 8 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Largest Contentful Paint: 24.7 s
24.7 sYour largest element takes 24.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image.
Time to Interactive: 28.0 s
28.0 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 28.0 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 5.8 s
5.8 sThe first text or image appears after 5.8 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.1 s
10.1 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.1 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 462 ms
462 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 462 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.104
0.104The layout shifts by 0.104 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
12 images without width and height
12 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
-5%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 106 ms to 100 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
-9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.3 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
6 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 1.9 s
1.9 sReal visitors wait 1.9 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 114 ms
114 msReal visitors wait 114 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.02
0.02For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.02 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 0.9 s
0.9 sReal visitors see the first content after 0.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 317 ms
317 msReal visitors wait 317 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 9.0 MB in 256 requests
9.0 MBYour homepage downloads 9.0 MB in 256 requests on a phone: images 4.0 MB (29), scripts 3.7 MB (74) and other files 828 KiB (129). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
5 images over 500 KB
5 images weigh 3.4 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.
5 images far larger than shown
565 KiB5 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example f7c37b3b-9446-45e4-8bbd-4c293f89297a.jpeg at 1,280 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 565 KiB.
8 images in older formats
8 images (3.5 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.
7 images below the first screen load straight away
7 images further down the page (3.4 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 2.6 g of CO₂ per visit
2.55 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 2.55 g of CO₂e: 306.2 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
1 button without a name
1 button has no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
8 tap targets too small
8 tap targets are too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes (1 element)
Elements must only use permitted ARIA attributes: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated serious by axe-core.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (42 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 42 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
18 links without text
18 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h6), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 10 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is short (16 characters)
Your title is only 16 characters: “Trixie Cosmetics”. Between 30 and 65 characters leaves room to say what you do and for whom.
Meta description is short (64 characters)
Your meta description is only 64 characters: “Pro formulas in toy packaging from drag superstar Trixie Mattel.”. 70 to 160 characters is enough to sell the click.
Structured data has 3 problems
Structured data found (Organization) but with 3 problems, for example “Organization: missing name”.
1 link with vague text
1 link use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind it.
62 internal links, 15 external
The homepage links to 62 pages on trixiecosmetics.com and 15 external pages.
5 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Welcome to Trixie Cosmetics Trixie Cosmetics”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://trixiecosmetics.com/.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://trixiecosmetics.com/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, sameAs (social profiles) and contact details; logo and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (184 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://trixiecosmetics.com/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 page without a title
https://trixiecosmetics.com/customer_authentication/redirect has no <title>, so Google invents the link text in results.
1 linked page hidden from search
https://trixiecosmetics.com/customer_authentication/redirect is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
5 pages without a meta description
https://trixiecosmetics.com/pages/tctv, https://trixiecosmetics.com/customer_authentication/redirect, https://trixiecosmetics.com/collections/face, https://trixiecosmetics.com/collections/all and https://trixiecosmetics.com/collections/jinkx-monsoon have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://trixiecosmetics.com/collections/eyes and https://trixiecosmetics.com/collections/tools use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
1 link to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://trixiecosmetics.com/pages/Wishlist, whose canonical is https://trixiecosmetics.com/pages/wishlist. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
12 pages without an H1
https://trixiecosmetics.com/pages/about, https://trixiecosmetics.com/pages/where-to-buy, https://trixiecosmetics.com/pages/faq, https://trixiecosmetics.com/customer_authentication/redirect, https://trixiecosmetics.com/collections/accessories and https://trixiecosmetics.com/collections/face and 6 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page slow to respond
https://trixiecosmetics.com/collections/bundles took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 28 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Best practices
11 small tap targets
11 of 31 tappable elements near the top of the page are smaller than 24 px, hard to hit with a thumb.
5 third-party cookies
5 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
5 JavaScript errors while loading
5 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “unable to find element”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
1 checks passed
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No social proof
No testimonials, customer logos, ratings or customer counts on the homepage: nothing tells a new visitor that others already trust you.
No analytics detected
No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.
Only about 229 words
The homepage has only about 229 words of visible text; thin pages give Google and first-time buyers little to go on.
Phone number is not tap-to-call
Your phone number appears as text but isn't a tel: link, so phone visitors can't tap to call.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
3 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop” and “Where to buy”.
13 calls to action
The homepage has 13 calls to action, for example “Shop”, “Where to buy” and “Shop All”.
3 short forms
3 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
13 cookies set on arrival
13Opening the homepage sets 13 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
26 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 26 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at trixiecosmetics.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 19 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Eg Auto Add To Cart · Bundler Bundles App · Judge Me Reviews · Variant Image Wizard Swatch · Easy Profile Editor · Attentive · Shoppinggives · Change Commerce · Prod Master Fad8e300 · V 3b62d4a · Essential Post Purchase Upsell · Upcart · zooomyapps.com · nice-team.net · nfcube.com · rise-ai.com · hextom.com · goaffpro.com · attn.tv
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Hosting
- Shopify
Company
- Headquarters
- Burbank
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 51 issues on trixiecosmetics.com, including 19 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.