Website review, no card needed

tsi.com logo

tsi.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 27 October 202644 issues · 93 checks

This review found 44 issues worth fixing on tsi.com, 17 of them high impact, across 93 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.0 s2.4 sMay 9Oct 242.7 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 9, 20262.5 s
May 16, 20262.5 s
May 23, 20262.5 s
May 30, 20262.6 s
Jun 6, 20262.6 s
Jun 13, 20262.7 s
Jun 20, 20262.9 s
Jun 27, 20262.9 s
Jul 4, 20262.9 s
Jul 11, 20262.9 s
Jul 18, 20262.9 s
Jul 25, 20262.9 s
Aug 1, 20262.8 s
Aug 8, 20262.8 s
Aug 15, 20262.8 s
Aug 22, 20262.7 s
Aug 29, 20262.6 s
Sep 5, 20262.6 s
Sep 12, 20262.5 s
Sep 19, 20262.5 s
Sep 26, 20262.5 s
Oct 3, 20262.6 s
Oct 10, 20262.6 s
Oct 17, 20262.7 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
126 ms106 msMay 9Oct 24113 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 9, 2026110 ms
May 16, 2026112 ms
May 23, 2026112 ms
May 30, 2026116 ms
Jun 6, 2026120 ms
Jun 13, 2026122 ms
Jun 20, 2026124 ms
Jun 27, 2026121 ms
Jul 4, 2026118 ms
Jul 11, 2026114 ms
Jul 18, 2026111 ms
Jul 25, 2026109 ms
Aug 1, 2026108 ms
Aug 8, 2026110 ms
Aug 15, 2026111 ms
Aug 22, 2026112 ms
Aug 29, 2026115 ms
Sep 5, 2026114 ms
Sep 12, 2026117 ms
Sep 19, 2026114 ms
Sep 26, 2026113 ms
Oct 3, 2026114 ms
Oct 10, 2026113 ms
Oct 17, 2026115 ms
Oct 24, 2026113 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tsi.com (desktop) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tsi.com at 0.5 s0.5 s
  2. tsi.com at 0.9 s0.9 s
  3. tsi.com at 1.4 s1.4 s
  4. tsi.com at 1.8 s1.8 s
  5. tsi.com at 2.3 s2.3 s
  6. tsi.com at 2.8 s2.8 s
  7. tsi.com at 3.2 s3.2 s
  8. tsi.com at 3.7 s3.7 s

Speed

11 to fix42
  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    2.5 s · 704 KiB

    About 704 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    1.2 s · 529 KiB

    25 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (529 KiB).

  • audioeye-services.com adds 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    audioeye-services.com costs a phone 1.1 s of main-thread work and 298 KiB of downloads while your page loads. That alone is enough to make taps feel slow. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Mobile performance score: 42

    42/100

    Your mobile performance score is 42 (desktop: 64). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 5.8 s

    A phone's processor spends 5.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 4.0 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Improve image delivery

    3.6 MB

    15 images could be 3.6 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • 8 third-party services on the page

    8 third-party services load with your homepage (audioeye-services.com, Google Tag Manager and Facebook and others), adding 1.4 MB and 2.8 s of main-thread time.

  • Google Tag Manager adds 930 ms

    930 ms

    Google Tag Manager costs a phone 930 ms of main-thread work and 533 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    600 ms · 193 KiB

    About 193 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 600 ms faster on a phone.

  • Render-blocking requests

    400 ms

    1 file blocks the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining it could save about 400 ms.

  • 20 long tasks on the main thread

    20 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 337 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    150 ms · 77 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 77 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.

  • Font display

    50 ms

    Web fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 50 ms).

  • Minify JavaScript

    24 KiB

    24 KiB could be saved by minifying JavaScript.

  • Duplicated JavaScript

    9 KiB

    9 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.

  • Chained critical requests

    Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 2 ms

    2 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 2 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix67
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 13.0 s

    13.0 s

    Your largest element takes 13.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “Introducing BioTrak II BFPC — Catching Contamination at the…”.

  • Time to Interactive: 16.8 s

    16.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 16.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Speed Index: 8.2 s

    8.2 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 8.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.1 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user LCP: 3.6 s

    3.6 s

    Real visitors wait 3.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user FCP: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 1.9 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.3 s

    1.3 s

    Real visitors wait 1.3 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 27 images without width and height

    27 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • First Contentful Paint: 2.3 s

    2.3 s

    The first text or image appears after 2.3 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors

    +3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 110 ms to 113 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    +8%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.5 s to 2.7 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

3 checks passed
  • Real-user INP: 111 ms

    111 ms

    Real visitors wait 111 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user CLS: 0.05

    0.05

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.05 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix25
  • Page weight: 6.5 MB in 118 requests

    6.5 MB

    Your homepage downloads 6.5 MB in 118 requests on a phone: images 4.4 MB (37), scripts 1.8 MB (41) and stylesheets 185 KiB (4). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 4 images over 500 KB

    4 images weigh 2.6 MB together. On a phone connection a single image that size takes seconds.

  • 6 images far larger than shown

    1.9 MB

    6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example 7627803248_PI_2024_PWCPC-Launch-Package_4pics_TSI-Homepage-1 at 1,920 px wide, shown at 390 px. Resized copies would save about 1.9 MB.

  • 12 images in older formats

    12 images (3.4 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • About 1.9 g of CO₂ per visit

    1.85 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 1.85 g of CO₂e: 222.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

1 checks passed
  • Images load when needed

    Images below the first screen wait until the visitor scrolls to them.

Accessibility

7 to fixGoogle 8289
  • Invalid ARIA attributes

    1 element use ARIA attributes their role does not allow, which confuses screen readers.

  • 1 text element with low contrast

    1 text element doesn't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 1 image without alt text

    1 image has no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (11 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 11 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 3 links without text

    3 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • Headings skip levels

    Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.

1 checks passed
  • 40 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 47 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 40 passed and 7 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

4 to fixGoogle 8584
  • No structured data

    No structured data (JSON-LD), so Google can't show rich results such as your logo, ratings or FAQs.

  • 8 H1 headlines

    There are 8 <h1> headlines (“Introducing BioTrak II BFPC — Catching Contaminat…”, “Expanding the OmniCount™ Family” and “TSI OmniCount™ PWCPC Wins Two 2026 OH&S New Produ…”). One clear main headline is easier for people and search engines.

  • Meta description is long (337 characters)

    Your meta description is 337 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 11 links with vague text

    11 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 168 internal links, 13 external

    The homepage links to 168 pages on tsi.com and 13 external pages.

4 checks passed
  • Title: 59 characters

    Your title is a healthy 59 characters: “Precision Measurement Solutions, Software and Service | TSI”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://tsi.com/.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://tsi.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

1 to fix88
  • No Organization structured data

    There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.

  • No llms.txt

    There is no https://tsi.com/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.

2 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (921 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

Other pages

2 to fix90
  • 1 link to non-canonical URLs

    Your homepage links to 1 page by a URL that isn't its canonical one, for example https://tsi.com/Indoor-Environments, whose canonical is https://tsi.com/indoor-environments. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.

  • 11 pages without an H1

    https://tsi.com/markets, https://tsi.com/electronics-manufacturing, https://tsi.com/emergency-response-and-law-enforcement, https://tsi.com/healthcare, https://tsi.com/hvac-consultant and https://tsi.com/Indoor-Environments and 5 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 1 page with very little text

    https://tsi.com/cn has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 75 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

5 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

3 to fixGoogle 8176
  • 1 broken image

    1 image failed to load on a phone, for example https://bat.bing.com/action/0?ti=343267906&tm=gtm002&Ver=2&mid=eb78d1a0-804e-45fa-bb2b-f0d7aa96c864&bo=1&sid=c687f3b0d1d511f1b8921b374f67c85d&vid=c6880180d1d511f1ac67bfd2d1fd577b&vids=1&msclkid=N&pi=9.

  • Deprecated browser APIs

    The page uses 1 deprecated browser API that will stop working in future browsers (“Unload event listeners are deprecated and will be removed.”).

  • 3 JavaScript errors while loading

    3 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Access to XMLHttpRequest at 'https://wsv3cdn.audioeye-services.com/static-scripts/v2/2026-10-22/compliance.css' from or…”.

2 checks passed
  • Tap targets are thumb-sized

    24 of 24 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.

  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix88
  • Local business without LocalBusiness data

    Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.

  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 2 trust badges. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No opening hours

    The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.

  • No map or directions link

    There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 711 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 711 words of visible text.

6 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “LEARN MORE”.

  • 16 calls to action

    The homepage has 16 calls to action, for example “Request Repairs & Calibrations”, “How to Request Services” and “Register a Product”.

  • 2 short forms

    2 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.

  • Analytics in place

    Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 1 phone link and 1 email link.

  • Phone number on the homepage

    Your phone number is on the homepage as a tap-to-call link.

Privacy and tracking

  • 9 trackers load before any consent

    9

    Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, HubSpot and LinkedIn Insight and 4 mores (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.

  • 28 cookies set on arrival

    28

    Opening the homepage sets 28 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • 43 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 43 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • Consent tool: OneTrust

    A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tsi.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
jQuery
Analytics
Google Tag Manager
Hosting
Azure

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 44 issues on tsi.com, including 21 speed issues, 4 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25