Website review, no card needed
tsum.ru website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 30 October 202642 issues · 82 checks
This review found 42 issues worth fixing on tsum.ru, 16 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: improve image delivery. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
65DClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.4 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.5 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.7 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.6 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 2.6 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | 385 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 377 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 373 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 386 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 394 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 403 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 414 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 414 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 418 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 420 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 415 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 409 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 403 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 402 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 400 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 404 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 401 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 397 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 401 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 398 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 402 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 413 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 423 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 414 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 401 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Improve image delivery
5.9 s · 7.5 MB61 images could be 7.5 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.9 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
2.5 s · 1.2 MB74 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (1.2 MB).
Reduce unused JavaScript
2.5 s · 688 KiBAbout 688 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 2.5 s faster on a phone.
Render-blocking requests
1.2 s4 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.2 s.
Mobile performance score: 46
46/100Your mobile performance score is 46. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, AdRiver and Yandex Metrica and others), adding 769 KiB and 727 ms of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 340 ms
340 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 340 ms of main-thread work and 333 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Main-thread work: 3.5 s
A phone's processor spends 3.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.2 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
Reduce unused CSS
300 ms · 50 KiBAbout 50 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.
9 long tasks on the main thread
9 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 284 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
2,763 HTML elements
The page has 2,763 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Legacy JavaScript
150 ms · 69 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 69 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 150 ms faster on a phone.
1 checks passed
Server response: 265 ms
265 msYour server sent the HTML in 265 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 19.0 s
19.0 sYour largest element takes 19.0 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the image “tsum_main_image”.
Time to Interactive: 23.3 s
23.3 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 23.3 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 10.6 s
10.6 sVisually, the page fills in at 10.6 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Real-user LCP: 2.6 s
2.6 sReal visitors wait 2.6 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 497 ms
497 msReal visitors wait 497 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.17
0.17For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.17 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
90 images without width and height
90 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Total Blocking Time: 469 ms
469 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 469 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.178
0.178The layout shifts by 0.178 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 385 ms to 401 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
+9%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-24, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.4 s to 2.6 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
3 checks passed
Real-user FCP: 1.5 s
1.5 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.5 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 749 ms
749 msReal visitors wait 749 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
First Contentful Paint: 1.4 s
1.4 sThe first text or image appears after 1.4 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 42.8 MB in 350 requests
42.8 MBYour homepage downloads 42.8 MB in 350 requests on a phone: media 30.0 MB (8), images 10.5 MB (149) and scripts 1.6 MB (35). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
About 12.1 g of CO₂ per visit
12.12 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 12.12 g of CO₂e: 1454.1 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
Accessibility
10 text elements with low contrast
10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
Orphan list items
Some list items are not inside a list.
Malformed lists
Some lists contain elements other than list items, which screen readers announce wrongly.
12 images without alt text
12 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (16 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Zoom is disabled
The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.
25 links without text
25 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (16 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 16 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Frames without titles
1 frame has no title, so screen-reader users cannot tell what it contains.
1 form field without a label
1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h2 → h4), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
1 checks passed
41 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 50 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 41 passed and 9 failed. 1 more need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (90 characters)
Your title is 90 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Интернет-магазин ЦУМ: одежда, обувь и аксессуары премиум-класса от ведущих мировых брендов”.
357 internal links, 18 external
The homepage links to 357 pages on tsum.ru and 18 external pages.
7 checks passed
Meta description: 158 characters
Your meta description is 158 characters: “ЦУМ — интернет-магазин брендовой одежды, обуви, сумок и аксессуаров премиум-класса. Более 700 модных брендов. Доставка …”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Интернет-магазин женской одежды”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.tsum.ru/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tsum.ru/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
No Organization structured data
There is no Organization (or LocalBusiness) JSON-LD, so search engines and AI assistants have no machine-readable facts about who runs the site: its name, logo, profiles and contact details.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (831 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://www.tsum.ru/llms.txt (18 KiB, 77 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
1 linked page hidden from search
https://www.tsum.ru/favorites is marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If it is meant to be found, remove the noindex.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.tsum.ru/favorites has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
1 page slow to respond
https://www.tsum.ru/brand/gucci.html took over 3 s to send its HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 115 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
7 pages of 15 loaded without an error (the rest turned automated requests away).
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
Every page has an H1
Each page we checked has a main headline.
Every page has a title
All 7 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
12 third-party cookies
12 third-party cookies are set on load; browsers are restricting these, so whatever relies on them breaks.
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
Browser-reported issues
Chrome logged issues while loading the page (“Cookie”).
Missing source maps
Large scripts ship without source maps.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
55 of 60 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Thin social proof
Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 466 words of copy
The homepage carries about 466 words of visible text.
3 checks passed
1 short form
A short form (3 fields at most) is right on the homepage.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Direct contact links
Visitors can reach you directly: 2 phone links and 4 email links.
Privacy and tracking
1 tracker load before any consent
1Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
4 cookies set on arrival
4Opening the homepage sets 4 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
4 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 4 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tsum.ru, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
- Hosting
- HLL
Company
- Founded
- 1908
- Headquarters
- Moscow
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 42 issues on tsum.ru, including 21 speed issues, 1 SEO issue and 3 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.