Website review, no card needed
ttracing.uk website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 10 November 202635 issues · 90 checks
This review found 35 issues worth fixing on ttracing.uk, 11 of them high impact, across 90 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 27.9 MB in 723 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
89B- #3,396 of 108,328 reviewed websitesbeats 95%
- #1,781 of 61,424 online storesbeats 95%
- #1,733 of 56,053 Shopify storesbeats 95%
Closest competitors among Shopify stores
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 1.7 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 1.6 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 1.5 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 1.4 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 1.3 s |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 1.2 s |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 1.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 23, 2026 | 106 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 106 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 107 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 109 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 111 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 24, 2026 | 110 ms |
| Oct 31, 2026 | 112 ms |
| Nov 7, 2026 | 111 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
Speed
Render-blocking requests
1.6 s19 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.6 s.
Main-thread work: 5.8 s
A phone's processor spends 5.8 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.8 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
5,440 HTML elements
The page has 5,440 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.
Improve image delivery
3.0 MB29 images could be 3.0 MB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Shopify, Clarity and cloudfront.net and others), adding 15.8 MB and 748 ms of main-thread time.
Shopify adds 330 ms
330 msShopify costs a phone 330 ms of main-thread work and 15.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Mobile performance score: 79
79/100Your mobile performance score is 79. Pages that score under 90 lose visitors before the first paint.
Reduce unused JavaScript
731 KiBAbout 731 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
377 KiB10 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (377 KiB).
Reduce unused CSS
190 ms · 159 KiBAbout 159 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 190 ms faster on a phone.
Font display
100 msWeb fonts hide text while they load. Setting font-display: swap shows text immediately (about 100 ms).
6 long tasks on the main thread
6 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 96 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Legacy JavaScript
41 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 41 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.
Minify CSS
6 KiB6 KiB could be saved by minifying CSS.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Forced reflow
Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.
1 checks passed
Server response: 40 ms
40 msYour server sent the HTML in 40 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Time to Interactive: 44.6 s
44.6 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 44.6 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
Speed Index: 12.2 s
12.2 sVisually, the page fills in at 12.2 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
First Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sThe first text or image appears after 2.7 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
41 images without width and height
41 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Largest Contentful Paint: 2.7 s
2.7 sYour largest element takes 2.7 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Black Friday Monster Sale ends in 02d 09h 38m 00s.”. Most of its time is element render delay (1.4 s).
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+3%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 106 ms to 111 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
9 checks passed
Passes Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)).
Real-user LCP: 0.8 s
0.8 sReal visitors wait 0.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user INP: 131 ms
131 msReal visitors wait 131 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user CLS: 0.03
0.03For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.03 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.0 s
1.0 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.0 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 358 ms
358 msReal visitors wait 358 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Largest content (LCP) got 16% faster for real visitors
-16%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-11-07, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 1.5 s to 1.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.098
0.098The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0.098, good is under 0.1).
Total Blocking Time: 78 ms
78 msScripts block the page for only 78 ms while loading. Good is under 200 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 27.9 MB in 723 requests
27.9 MBYour homepage downloads 27.9 MB in 723 requests on a phone: media 13.5 MB (2), images 10.8 MB (487) and scripts 1.5 MB (101). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
An image on the first screen is lazy-loaded
DESK_POWER_PACK_-_UK.jpg is on the first screen but marked loading="lazy", so the browser waits before fetching it and the page looks finished later. Load it eagerly (and give it fetchpriority="high" if it is the main image).
6 images far larger than shown
392 KiB6 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example certifications-transbg_1.png at 800 px wide, shown at 30 px. Resized copies would save about 392 KiB.
About 7.9 g of CO₂ per visit
7.92 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 7.92 g of CO₂e: 950.0 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
7 buttons without a name
7 buttons have no accessible name, so screen readers announce just “button”.
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values (2 elements)
ARIA attributes must conform to valid values: 2 elements on the page fail this check, rated critical by axe-core.
10 text elements with low contrast
10 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
1 tap target too small
1 tap target is too small or too close together to hit reliably with a finger.
2 images without alt text
2 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (103 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 103 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text (54 elements)
Alternative text of images should not be repeated as text: 54 elements on the page fail this check, rated minor by axe-core.
26 form fields without a label
26 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
1 link without text
1 visible link has no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where it goes.
Headings should not be empty (1 element)
Headings should not be empty: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated minor by axe-core.
Headings skip levels
Headings skip levels (h1 → h3), which makes the page harder to scan with a screen reader.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (2 elements).
1 checks passed
46 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 56 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 46 passed and 10 failed. 4 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
36 links with vague text
36 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.
Meta description is long (276 characters)
Your meta description is 276 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
436 internal links, 16 external
The homepage links to 436 pages on ttracing.uk and 16 external pages.
7 checks passed
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “TTRacing United Kingdom”.
Title: 61 characters
Your title is a healthy 61 characters: “Best Gaming Chair, Standing Desk & Office Chair | TTRacing UK”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://ttracing.uk/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
Open Graph tags complete
Open Graph tags are complete, so shared links show a title, description and image.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://ttracing.uk/sitemap.xml.
AI search readiness
4 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 4 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo and contact details; sameAs (social profiles) and description would complete it.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (2,684 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
llms.txt published
The site publishes https://ttracing.uk/llms.txt (6 KiB, 8 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.
Other pages
3 pages without a meta description
https://ttracing.uk/pages/bundle-sale-13, https://ttracing.uk/pages/bundle-sale-14 and https://ttracing.uk/pages/bundle-sale-15 have no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
15 pages without an H1
https://ttracing.uk/pages/bundle-deals, https://ttracing.uk/pages/bt21-early-bird-registration, https://ttracing.uk/pages/bundle-sale-2, https://ttracing.uk/pages/bundle-sale-10, https://ttracing.uk/pages/bundle-sale-3 and https://ttracing.uk/pages/bundle-sale-13 and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
3 pages slow to respond
https://ttracing.uk/pages/bundle-sale-3, https://ttracing.uk/pages/bundle-sale-15 and https://ttracing.uk/pages/bundle-sale-5 took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 141 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
5 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Canonical URLs point to themselves
No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.
Titles are unique
Every page we checked has its own title.
No linked page is hidden from search
None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.
Every page has a title
All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
1 JavaScript error while loading
1 error was logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
237 of 248 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 1,234 words of copy
The homepage carries about 1,234 words of visible text.
Urgency cues
The page uses urgency cues (a countdown or limited-time wording).
5 checks passed
Clear next step on the first screen
On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Shop now” and “Shop Now”.
15 calls to action
The homepage has 15 calls to action, for example “Shop Now”, “Contact” and “Contact Us”.
29 short forms
29 short forms (1 field at most) are right on the homepage.
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: 16 testimonial or review blocks and 2 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity.
Privacy and tracking
2 trackers load before any consent
2Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Tag Manager and Microsoft Clarity (measured from a US location before any click). No consent tool was detected. Visitors from the EU, UK and several US states must be asked first.
6 cookies set on arrival
6Opening the homepage sets 6 cookies, 1 of them by other companies (measured from a US location before any click).
No consent tool detected
No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.
22 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 22 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at ttracing.uk, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Apps on your store
Your storefront loads 11 apps. Each one is code from another company running for your shoppers.
Apps your storefront loads
Mp Instagram Feed · Eg Auto Add To Cart · Judge Me Reviews · Dr Stacked Discounts · Powerful Form Builder · Microsoft Clarity · Assortion · Frontend · Forms · Orbe Geolocation · Whatsapp Chat
Apps found in the homepage's code. Apps that only run in checkout or the admin aren't seen, and a headless storefront shows none. App data from programmable.info
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Framework
- jQuery
- E-commerce
- Shopify
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager | Microsoft Clarity
- Hosting
- Shopify
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 35 issues on ttracing.uk, including 14 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 1 conversion gap. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.