Website review, no card needed

tuya.com logo

tuya.com website review

Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 4 November 202640 issues · 82 checks

This review found 40 issues worth fixing on tuya.com, 13 of them high impact, across 82 checks. The most urgent: page weight: 39.3 MB in 184 requests. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.

  1. Homepage
  2. Phone render
  3. Links and pages
  4. Google PageSpeed

Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile

Real-visitor load time (LCP)75th percentile, phones
3.6 s2.6 sMay 16Oct 312.8 s
Show as table
DateReal-visitor load time (LCP)
May 16, 20262.8 s
May 23, 20262.9 s
May 30, 20263.1 s
Jun 6, 20263.3 s
Jun 13, 20263.3 s
Jun 20, 20263.5 s
Jun 27, 20263.4 s
Jul 4, 20263.4 s
Jul 11, 20263.4 s
Jul 18, 20263.4 s
Jul 25, 20263.4 s
Aug 1, 20263.3 s
Aug 8, 20263.3 s
Aug 15, 20263.3 s
Aug 22, 20263.3 s
Aug 29, 20263.4 s
Sep 5, 20263.3 s
Sep 12, 20263.3 s
Sep 19, 20263.1 s
Sep 26, 20263.1 s
Oct 3, 20262.9 s
Oct 10, 20262.8 s
Oct 17, 20262.8 s
Oct 24, 20262.7 s
Oct 31, 20262.8 s
Real-visitor tap response (INP)75th percentile, phones
329 ms207 msMay 16Oct 31250 ms
Show as table
DateReal-visitor tap response (INP)
May 16, 2026277 ms
May 23, 2026275 ms
May 30, 2026278 ms
Jun 6, 2026277 ms
Jun 13, 2026278 ms
Jun 20, 2026291 ms
Jun 27, 2026286 ms
Jul 4, 2026288 ms
Jul 11, 2026298 ms
Jul 18, 2026278 ms
Jul 25, 2026283 ms
Aug 1, 2026282 ms
Aug 8, 2026289 ms
Aug 15, 2026294 ms
Aug 22, 2026291 ms
Aug 29, 2026298 ms
Sep 5, 2026300 ms
Sep 12, 2026310 ms
Sep 19, 2026315 ms
Sep 26, 2026315 ms
Oct 3, 2026289 ms
Oct 10, 2026241 ms
Oct 17, 2026221 ms
Oct 24, 2026229 ms
Oct 31, 2026250 ms

Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.

One score from every part of this review. How it works

Full-page screenshot of tuya.com (phone) rendered by Google PageSpeed Insights

How it loaded on a phone

  1. tuya.com at 1.0 s1.0 s
  2. tuya.com at 2.1 s2.1 s
  3. tuya.com at 3.1 s3.1 s
  4. tuya.com at 4.2 s4.2 s
  5. tuya.com at 5.2 s5.2 s
  6. tuya.com at 6.2 s6.2 s
  7. tuya.com at 7.3 s7.3 s
  8. tuya.com at 8.3 s8.3 s

Speed

11 to fix39
  • Render-blocking requests

    1.5 s

    5 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 1.5 s.

  • 10,167 HTML elements

    The page has 10,167 HTML elements. Above 1,500, rendering and every interaction get slower on phones.

  • Mobile performance score: 39

    39/100

    Your mobile performance score is 39. Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.

  • Main-thread work: 6.5 s

    A phone's processor spends 6.5 s on main-thread work while loading, 2.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.

  • Use efficient cache lifetimes

    450 ms · 34.8 MB

    173 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (34.8 MB).

  • 2 third-party services on the page

    2 third-party services load with your homepage (cdn5th.com and tuyacn.com), adding 39.2 MB and 951 ms of main-thread time.

  • cdn5th.com adds 951 ms

    951 ms

    cdn5th.com costs a phone 951 ms of main-thread work and 39.2 MB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.

  • 15 long tasks on the main thread

    15 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 2.1 s. During a long task the page ignores taps.

  • Reduce unused CSS

    300 ms · 84 KiB

    About 84 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 300 ms faster on a phone.

  • Improve image delivery

    358 KiB

    14 images could be 358 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen.

  • Reduce unused JavaScript

    300 KiB

    About 300 KiB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page.

  • Legacy JavaScript

    33 KiB

    Polyfills for old browsers add 33 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need.

  • Forced reflow

    Scripts make the browser recalculate the layout repeatedly while the page loads, which wastes processor time on phones.

1 checks passed
  • Server response: 436 ms

    436 ms

    Your server sent the HTML in 436 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.

Core Web Vitals

10 to fix33
  • Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors

    Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.

  • Time to Interactive: 35.8 s

    35.8 s

    The page becomes fully interactive after 35.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.

  • Largest Contentful Paint: 8.8 s

    8.8 s

    Your largest element takes 8.8 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Create AI-Driven Smart Products”.

  • Total Blocking Time: 1.9 s

    1.9 s

    Scripts block taps and scrolling for 1.9 s in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.

  • Speed Index: 9.0 s

    9.0 s

    Visually, the page fills in at 9.0 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.

  • Real-user LCP: 2.8 s

    2.8 s

    Real visitors wait 2.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.

  • Real-user INP: 271 ms

    271 ms

    Real visitors wait 271 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.

  • Real-user FCP: 2.6 s

    2.6 s

    Real visitors see the first content after 2.6 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.

  • Real-user TTFB: 1.7 s

    1.7 s

    Real visitors wait 1.7 s for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.

  • 29 images without width and height

    29 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.

  • Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors

    -3%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.8 s to 2.8 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

4 checks passed
  • Real-user CLS: 0.00

    0.00

    For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.00 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.

  • Tap response (INP) got 13% faster for real visitors

    -13%

    Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-31, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 277 ms to 250 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).

  • First Contentful Paint: 1.1 s

    1.1 s

    The first text or image appears after 1.1 s, inside the 1.8 s “good” threshold.

  • Cumulative Layout Shift: 0

    0

    The layout barely moves while loading (CLS 0, good is under 0.1).

Images and page weight

4 to fix33
  • Page weight: 39.3 MB in 184 requests

    39.3 MB

    Your homepage downloads 39.3 MB in 184 requests on a phone: media 32.4 MB (3), images 5.0 MB (126) and scripts 1.5 MB (37). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.

  • 11 images far larger than shown

    1,012 KiB

    11 images are downloaded at several times the size a phone draws them, for example dbb34ada9e14ec50a2a0.png at 3,000 px wide, shown at 100 px. Resized copies would save about 1,012 KiB.

  • 24 images in older formats

    24 images (1.7 MB) are JPEG, PNG or GIF. The same pictures as WebP or AVIF are usually much smaller at the same quality, and every current browser shows them.

  • 24 images below the first screen load straight away

    24 images further down the page (1.6 MB) download before anyone scrolls to them. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.

  • About 11.1 g of CO₂ per visit

    11.13 g

    By the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 11.13 g of CO₂e: 1335.7 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.

Accessibility

8 to fixGoogle 7887
  • 3 text elements with low contrast

    3 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.

  • 13 images without alt text

    13 images have no alt text, which hurts accessibility and image search.

  • All page content should be contained by landmarks (117 elements)

    All page content should be contained by landmarks: 117 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • No main landmark

    The page has no <main> landmark, so screen-reader users cannot jump straight to the content.

  • Zoom is disabled

    The viewport tag blocks pinch-zoom, which low-vision visitors rely on.

  • Page should contain a level-one heading (1 element)

    Page should contain a level-one heading: 1 element on the page fails this check, rated moderate by axe-core.

  • 6 links without text

    6 visible links have no text or label, so screen readers cannot say where they go.

  • 1 form field without a label

    1 form field has no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.

1 checks passed
  • 30 automated accessibility rules passed

    axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 37 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 30 passed and 7 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.

SEO

3 to fixGoogle 7791
  • 66 links crawlers can't follow

    66 links have no real href, so search engines can't follow them.

  • Meta description is long (183 characters)

    Your meta description is 183 characters; Google truncates after about 160, so the end of your pitch is cut.

  • 3 links with vague text

    3 links use generic text like “click here” or “learn more”, which tells Google nothing about the page behind them.

  • Open Graph partly set

    Open Graph is missing og:title and og:description, so shared links fall back to guesses.

  • No X (Twitter) card tag

    No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.

  • 89 internal links, 69 external

    The homepage links to 89 pages on tuya.com and 69 external pages.

6 checks passed
  • One H1 headline

    Your main headline reads: “Create AI-Driven Smart Products”.

  • Title: 54 characters

    Your title is a healthy 54 characters: “Tuya Global AIoT Platform | Smart Device IoT Solutions”.

  • Canonical URL set

    The canonical URL is https://www.tuya.com/.

  • Structured data in place

    Structured data found: Corporation, SoftwareApplication, WebPage and WebSite.

  • robots.txt in place

    robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.

  • XML sitemap found

    Your XML sitemap is reachable at https://www.tuya.com/sitemap.xml.

AI search readiness

100
4 checks passed
  • AI answer engines may read the site

    Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.

  • Organization data: 6 of 6 facts

    Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.

  • Text is in the HTML

    Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (1,193 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.

  • llms.txt published

    The site publishes https://tuya.com/llms.txt (4 KiB, 0 links), a plain-text guide to the site for AI tools.

Other pages

1 to fix95
  • 15 pages without an H1

    https://tuya.com/platform/productdev/tuyaos, https://tuya.com/platform/productdev/mcu-standard-protocol, https://tuya.com/platform/productdev/connect-sub-devices, https://tuya.com/platform/appdev/app-sdk, https://tuya.com/platform/appdev/oemapp and https://tuya.com/platform/appdev/panel-miniapp and 9 others have no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.

  • 3 pages slow to respond

    https://tuya.com/platform/appdev/app-sdk, https://tuya.com/platform/growth/data-intelligent-operation and https://tuya.com/platform/growth/data-center took over 3 s to send their HTML from our server.

  • 15 internal pages checked

    We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 39 found) and read each the way a search engine does.

6 checks passed
  • Linked pages load

    All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.

  • Canonical URLs point to themselves

    No page we checked hands its ranking to a different URL.

  • Every page has a meta description

    All 15 pages that loaded have a meta description.

  • Titles are unique

    Every page we checked has its own title.

  • No linked page is hidden from search

    None of the pages we checked carries a noindex tag.

  • Every page has a title

    All 15 pages that loaded have a <title>.

Best practices

1 to fixGoogle 9692
  • 2 JavaScript errors while loading

    2 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: net::ERR_FAILED”.

1 checks passed
  • Mobile viewport set

    The page declares a mobile viewport.

Content and conversion

2 to fix83
  • Thin social proof

    Social proof on the homepage: 1 trust badge. Pairing it with named testimonials or customer logos makes it far more convincing.

  • No analytics detected

    No analytics or tag manager detected in the HTML, so you can't measure whether any of these fixes work.

  • No risk reducer

    No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.

  • About 870 words of copy

    The homepage carries about 870 words of visible text.

4 checks passed
  • Clear next step on the first screen

    On a phone, the first screen shows a clear next step: “Contact Us”.

  • 11 calls to action

    The homepage has 11 calls to action, for example “Quick Start”, “Demo Board” and “Contact”.

  • 1 short form

    A short form (1 field at most) is right on the homepage.

  • Direct contact links

    Visitors can reach you directly: 3 phone links and 4 email links.

Privacy and tracking

  • 7 cookies set on arrival

    7

    Opening the homepage sets 7 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).

  • No consent tool detected

    No known cookie consent tool loads with the page. Some sites build their own banner, and some only show one to visitors from the EU.

  • 7 other companies contacted

    Loading the homepage contacts 7 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.

1 checks passed
  • No known trackers before consent

    No known advertising or analytics trackers load before a visitor clicks anything (measured from a US location before any click).

Security, domain, email and software versions

The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at tuya.com, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.

Upkeep, stack and company

Stack

Framework
Next.js
Hosting
AWS

Hiring

Hiring
3 open roles
Job board
careers page

Company

Founded
2014
Headquarters
Hangzhou

Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info

Go beyond the website

What your $25 Growth Playbook adds

This review found 40 issues on tuya.com, including 21 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 2 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.

  • 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
  • Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
  • Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
  • Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
  • Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
  • Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
  • Earned media and PR openings
  • At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
  • PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
  • Refresh the playbook later to see what changed

By continuing you agree to the Terms and acknowledge the Privacy Policy.

Free requests are written in the order they come in, so it can take a while. Pay $25 and yours is ready within a few hours. Either way you get a shareable link and a PDF.

  • No subscription
  • Free, or $25 to skip the line
  • Money-back guarantee

14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.

Get the full playbook · $25