Website review, no card needed
uala.it website review
Visit site (opens in a new tab)Reviewed 24 October 202638 issues · 86 checks
This review found 38 issues worth fixing on uala.it, 13 of them high impact, across 86 checks. The most urgent: reduce unused JavaScript. Your full playbook turns these into prioritised fixes alongside reviews, competitors and channels.
- Homepage
- Phone render
- Links and pages
- Google PageSpeed
Google PageSpeed Insights (opens in a new tab), mobile
Site score
71CClosest competitors among reviewed websites
Compare side by sideShow as table
| Date | Real-visitor load time (LCP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 9, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 16, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 23, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| May 30, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 2.3 s |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 2.2 s |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 2.2 s |
Show as table
| Date | Real-visitor tap response (INP) |
|---|---|
| May 2, 2026 | 305 ms |
| May 9, 2026 | 305 ms |
| May 16, 2026 | 304 ms |
| May 23, 2026 | 303 ms |
| May 30, 2026 | 305 ms |
| Jun 6, 2026 | 308 ms |
| Jun 13, 2026 | 311 ms |
| Jun 20, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Jun 27, 2026 | 317 ms |
| Jul 4, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Jul 11, 2026 | 321 ms |
| Jul 18, 2026 | 320 ms |
| Jul 25, 2026 | 316 ms |
| Aug 1, 2026 | 313 ms |
| Aug 8, 2026 | 314 ms |
| Aug 15, 2026 | 319 ms |
| Aug 22, 2026 | 325 ms |
| Aug 29, 2026 | 330 ms |
| Sep 5, 2026 | 334 ms |
| Sep 12, 2026 | 333 ms |
| Sep 19, 2026 | 329 ms |
| Sep 26, 2026 | 326 ms |
| Oct 3, 2026 | 327 ms |
| Oct 10, 2026 | 326 ms |
| Oct 17, 2026 | 327 ms |
Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab): real Chrome visitors over rolling 28-day periods.
One score from every part of this review. How it works
How it loaded on a phone
0.4 s
0.8 s
1.1 s
1.5 s
1.9 s
2.3 s
2.6 s
3.0 s
Speed
Reduce unused JavaScript
5.0 s · 1.1 MBAbout 1.1 MB of JavaScript is downloaded but never used on this page. Google estimates it would make the page about 5.0 s faster on a phone.
Use efficient cache lifetimes
3.8 s · 837 KiB37 files are served with short cache lifetimes, so returning visitors download them again (837 KiB).
Improve image delivery
1.1 s · 284 KiB4 images could be 284 KiB smaller with modern formats (WebP or AVIF) and sizes that fit a phone screen. Google estimates it would make the page about 1.1 s faster on a phone.
Mobile performance score: 31
31/100Your mobile performance score is 31 (desktop: 64). Under 50 is Google's “poor” band: many phone visitors leave before the page is usable.
8 third-party services on the page
8 third-party services load with your homepage (Google Tag Manager, Stripe and awswaf.com and others), adding 1.8 MB and 1.4 s of main-thread time.
Google Tag Manager adds 871 ms
871 msGoogle Tag Manager costs a phone 871 ms of main-thread work and 894 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
Legacy JavaScript
450 ms · 55 KiBPolyfills for old browsers add 55 KiB JavaScript that modern phones do not need. Google estimates it would make the page about 450 ms faster on a phone.
Main-thread work: 2.9 s
A phone's processor spends 2.9 s on main-thread work while loading, 1.9 s of it running JavaScript. Above 2 s, taps and scrolls feel sluggish.
awswaf.com adds 145 ms
145 msawswaf.com costs a phone 145 ms of main-thread work and 303 KiB of downloads while your page loads. Loading it after the page is usable, or only on the pages that need it, takes that off the critical path.
16 long tasks on the main thread
16 long tasks block the main thread while loading, the longest for 214 ms. During a long task the page ignores taps.
Render-blocking requests
150 ms3 files block the first paint until they finish downloading. Deferring or inlining them could save about 150 ms.
Reduce unused CSS
45 KiBAbout 45 KiB of CSS is downloaded but never applied on this page.
Phones get a much slower page than desktops
Desktop scores 64 but mobile only 31. A gap that wide usually means heavy scripts and images that hit phones hardest.
Chained critical requests
Critical files load one after another instead of in parallel (3 chains). Preconnecting to key origins and preloading the hero image shortens the chain.
Duplicated JavaScript
5 KiB5 KiB JavaScript is shipped twice across bundles.
1 checks passed
Server response: 14 ms
14 msYour server sent the HTML in 14 ms, well inside Google's 600 ms guideline.
Core Web Vitals
Fails Core Web Vitals for real visitors
Real Chrome users on phones do not pass Google's Core Web Vitals on this page (28-day field data from the Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab)). Google uses this in ranking.
Largest Contentful Paint: 18.1 s
18.1 sYour largest element takes 18.1 s to render on a phone. Google's threshold for “good” is 2.5 s. The largest element is the text “Utilizziamo i nostri cookie e quelle di terze parti per per…”.
Time to Interactive: 19.8 s
19.8 sThe page becomes fully interactive after 19.8 s. Good is under 3.8 s.
First Contentful Paint: 4.4 s
4.4 sThe first text or image appears after 4.4 s on a phone. Good is under 1.8 s.
Speed Index: 7.8 s
7.8 sVisually, the page fills in at 7.8 s (Speed Index). Good is under 3.4 s.
Total Blocking Time: 923 ms
923 msScripts block taps and scrolling for 923 ms in total while the page loads. Good is under 200 ms.
Real-user INP: 267 ms
267 msReal visitors wait 267 ms for the page to respond to a tap (75th percentile). Good is under 200 ms.
Cumulative Layout Shift: 0.161
0.161The layout shifts by 0.161 while loading, so content jumps under the reader's thumb. Good is under 0.1.
2 images without width and height
2 images have no width and height attributes, so the layout jumps as each one loads.
Tap response (INP) held steady for real visitors
+7%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' tap response (inp) went from 305 ms to 327 ms at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
Largest content (LCP) held steady for real visitors
0%Over the last 25 four-week periods to 2026-10-17, real Chrome visitors' largest content (lcp) went from 2.2 s to 2.2 s at the 75th percentile (Chrome UX Report (opens in a new tab) history).
4 checks passed
Real-user LCP: 1.8 s
1.8 sReal visitors wait 1.8 s for the largest content to appear (75th percentile). Good is under 2.5 s.
Real-user CLS: 0.09
0.09For real visitors the layout shifts by 0.09 (75th percentile). Good is under 0.1.
Real-user FCP: 1.2 s
1.2 sReal visitors see the first content after 1.2 s (75th percentile). Good is under 1.8 s.
Real-user TTFB: 672 ms
672 msReal visitors wait 672 ms for your server to start answering (75th percentile). Good is under 800 ms.
Images and page weight
Page weight: 3.1 MB in 77 requests
3.1 MBYour homepage downloads 3.1 MB in 77 requests on a phone: scripts 2.4 MB (30), images 414 KiB (12) and other files 93 KiB (25). Under 2 MB keeps phones on slow connections fast.
1 image far larger than shown
177 KiB1 image is downloaded at several times the size a phone draws it, for example v2.i17534911.w1851.h780.x24F18440.png at 1,851 px wide, shown at 275 px. Resized copies would save about 177 KiB.
1 image below the first screen load straight away
1 image further down the page (39 KiB) download before anyone scrolls to it. Adding loading="lazy" lets the first screen load first.
About 0.9 g of CO₂ per visit
0.88 gBy the Sustainable Web Design model, a visit to your homepage emits about 0.88 g of CO₂e: 105.6 kg a year at 10,000 visits a month. It scales with page weight, so every byte cut lowers it.
1 checks passed
Images use modern formats
Every sizeable image is WebP, AVIF or SVG.
Accessibility
5 text elements with low contrast
5 text elements don't have enough contrast against the background to read easily, especially outdoors on a phone.
All page content should be contained by landmarks (29 elements)
All page content should be contained by landmarks: 29 elements on the page fail this check, rated moderate by axe-core.
3 form fields without a label
3 form fields have no label, so screen readers announce an empty box and autofill guesses.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names.
Elements with visible text labels do not have matching accessible names. (1 element).
2 checks passed
Every image has alt text
All 6 images in the HTML carry an alt attribute.
43 automated accessibility rules passed
axe-core 4.13.0, the open-source engine behind most accessibility testing tools, ran 45 WCAG 2.2 A/AA and best-practice rules on the phone render: 43 passed and 2 failed. 2 mores need a person to judge. Automated rules catch about a third of accessibility problems; the rest need manual testing.
SEO
Title is long (68 characters)
Your title is 68 characters, so Google will cut it off around 60: “Prenota online parrucchiere, estetista, unghie, massaggi - Treatwell”.
No social preview image
No Open Graph image, so links shared on LinkedIn, Slack or Facebook show no preview picture.
1 link crawlers can't follow
1 link has no real href, so search engines can't follow it.
No X (Twitter) card tag
No twitter:card tag. X falls back to Open Graph, which is incomplete here.
50 internal links, 9 external
The homepage links to 50 pages on uala.it and 9 external pages.
6 checks passed
Meta description: 150 characters
Your meta description is 150 characters: “Treatwell è il modo smart per prenotare i tuoi appuntamenti di bellezza. Sfoglia oltre 15.000 saloni, leggi le recensio…”.
One H1 headline
Your main headline reads: “Treatwell”.
Canonical URL set
The canonical URL is https://www.treatwell.it/.
Structured data in place
Structured data found: Organization and WebSite.
robots.txt in place
robots.txt is in place and points crawlers to your sitemap.
XML sitemap found
Your XML sitemap is reachable at http://www.treatwell.it/site-map-index.xml.
AI search readiness
No llms.txt
There is no https://www.treatwell.it/llms.txt, a short Markdown guide to your key pages for AI tools (llmstxt.org). It is optional and few AI tools read it yet, so treat it as a cheap extra.
3 checks passed
AI answer engines may read the site
Your robots.txt lets the crawlers behind ChatGPT search, Claude and Perplexity read the site and cite it in answers.
Organization data: 6 of 6 facts
Your Organization JSON-LD gives name, url, logo, sameAs (social profiles), description and contact details.
Text is in the HTML
Your server sends the page's text in the HTML (281 words), so crawlers that don't run JavaScript still read it.
Other pages
2 linked pages hidden from search
https://www.treatwell.it/saloni/trattamento-colore-uomo,taglio-barba,taglio-uomo/offerta-tipo-locale/in-italia and https://www.treatwell.it/saloni/award-top-rated-2026/offerta-tipo-locale/%7B%7BlocationOrPostalRef%7D%7D are marked noindex but linked from your homepage. If they are meant to be found, remove the noindex.
2 pages share a title
https://www.treatwell.it/saloni/trattamento-gruppo-capelli/in-italia and https://www.treatwell.it/saloni/trattamento-colore-uomo,taglio-barba,taglio-uomo/offerta-tipo-locale/in-italia all use the title “Top 20 Parrucchieri a Italia - Treatwell”. Search engines can't tell which page to show for a search, so each competes with the others.
1 page without a meta description
https://www.treatwell.it/inspiration/showcasing-the-app-ss19 has no meta description, so Google writes the search snippet from whatever text it finds.
2 pages share a meta description
https://www.treatwell.it/saloni/trattamento-gruppo-capelli/in-italia and https://www.treatwell.it/saloni/trattamento-colore-uomo,taglio-barba,taglio-uomo/offerta-tipo-locale/in-italia use the same meta description. A description written for each page earns more clicks.
6 links to non-canonical URLs
Your homepage links to 6 pages by a URL that isn't their canonical one, for example https://www.treatwell.it/saloni/trattamento-gruppo-capelli/in-italia, whose canonical is https://www.treatwell.it/saloni/trattamento-gruppo-capelli/offerta-tipo-locale/in-italia. Linking straight to the canonical URL saves crawlers a detour and keeps ranking signals on one address.
1 page without an H1
https://www.treatwell.it/inspiration/showcasing-the-app-ss19 has no <h1> headline, so visitors and search engines get no clear main topic.
1 page with very little text
https://www.treatwell.it/inspiration/showcasing-the-app-ss19 has under 150 words in the HTML. Thin pages rarely rank; if the text loads with JavaScript, crawlers that don't run it see even less.
15 internal pages checked
We fetched 15 pages linked from your homepage (of 45 found) and read each the way a search engine does.
2 checks passed
Linked pages load
All 15 pages we checked loaded without an error.
Every page has a title
All 14 pages that loaded have a <title>.
Best practices
4 JavaScript errors while loading
4 errors were logged to the browser console while the page loaded, for example “Failed to load resource: the server responded with a status of 404 ()”.
2 checks passed
Tap targets are thumb-sized
21 of 24 tappable elements near the top are at least 24 px.
Mobile viewport set
The page declares a mobile viewport.
Content and conversion
No call to action on the first screen
On a phone, there is no call to action on the first screen: visitors have to scroll to find out what to do next.
No calls to action
We found no call-to-action buttons or links (such as “Book a demo” or “Get a quote”) anywhere on the homepage.
Local business without LocalBusiness data
Your homepage shows a street address but no LocalBusiness JSON-LD, so Google and AI assistants have to guess your address, hours and phone from the page text.
No phone number on the homepage
A local customer looking to call finds no phone number on the homepage. Add one, ideally as a tap-to-call link.
No direct contact details
No phone number or email link on the homepage, so ready-to-buy visitors have one fewer way to reach you.
No opening hours
The homepage shows no opening hours. If customers visit or call, show when.
No form on the homepage
There is no form on the homepage, so every lead has to click through to another page first.
No map or directions link
There is no link to Google or Apple Maps. A directions link is one tap for a phone visitor.
No risk reducer
No guarantee or risk reducer (money-back, free trial, no credit card) is mentioned, which is often what tips a hesitant visitor.
About 268 words of copy
The homepage carries about 268 words of visible text.
2 checks passed
Social proof on the page
Social proof on the homepage: a star rating and 3 trust badges.
Analytics in place
Analytics detected: Google Tag Manager.
Privacy and tracking
5 trackers load before any consent
5Before a visitor clicks anything, the page loads Google Ads, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar and Quantcast (measured from a US location before any click). A consent tool (OneTrust) is installed; check it blocks these until visitors agree where the law requires it.
10 cookies set on arrival
10Opening the homepage sets 10 cookies (measured from a US location before any click).
23 other companies contacted
Loading the homepage contacts 23 hosts run by other companies (fonts, scripts, analytics, ads), each of which sees the visitor's IP address.
1 checks passed
Consent tool: OneTrust
A consent management tool (OneTrust) loads with the page.
Security, domain, email and software versions
The security, domain and email checks, software and plugin versions, and any app with a known security problem are visible only to people at uala.it, because details like these could help someone attack a site. Every review keeps them private, whatever they found.
Upkeep, stack and company
Stack
- Analytics
- Google Tag Manager
Upkeep, stack, hiring and company data from programmable.info
Go beyond the website
What your $25 Growth Playbook adds
This review found 38 issues on uala.it, including 18 speed issues, 3 SEO issues and 5 conversion gaps. That is the website alone. The full Growth Playbook pairs these findings with what your customers say in public reviews and communities and what your closest competitors do better, then turns everything into at least 20 prioritised ideas, each with the evidence behind it, a step-by-step playbook, a metric and an owner.
- 28 research agents read your site, reviews, competitors, communities and public filings
- Customer review mining (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and more) and voice-of-pain analysis in your buyers’ own words
- Competitor intelligence with battlecards for your closest rivals
- Ideal customer profile, buyer segments and buying-stage funnel
- Ranked channels, outreach sequences and content angles
- Live Reddit threads where buyers ask for what you sell, with draft replies
- Earned media and PR openings
- At least 20 ideas with evidence, a step-by-step playbook, metric, owner, effort and impact, grouped into this week, this quarter, big bets and wildcards, plus a 30/60/90-day roadmap
- PDF, Markdown, CSV, Notion and Linear exports, and a shareable page your team can track progress on
- Refresh the playbook later to see what changed
14-day money-back guarantee: not happy for any reason, email us within 14 days and we refund in full.